本文選題：公積金 + 金融公平��； 參考：《安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：住房公積金制度在幫助職工解決住房問(wèn)題和改善居住環(huán)境中發(fā)揮了重要作用,促進(jìn)了我國(guó)的城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè),已發(fā)展成為我國(guó)住房保障體系中重要組成部分。但是在住房公積金政策的發(fā)展過(guò)程中,現(xiàn)行住房公積金政策所存在的問(wèn)題也逐漸凸顯,住房公積金運(yùn)營(yíng)中出現(xiàn)眾多金融公平性缺失的問(wèn)題。住房公積金應(yīng)該側(cè)重于解決中低收入職工的住房問(wèn)題,但在實(shí)際運(yùn)營(yíng)中,利益偏向了中高收入群體,甚至出現(xiàn)“劫貧濟(jì)富”的問(wèn)題。關(guān)于住房公積金的金融公平性的話題成為討論的焦點(diǎn),甚至部分人提出應(yīng)該取消住房公積金政策,引起了學(xué)術(shù)界和政府的關(guān)注。本文從金融公平性的概念出發(fā),將金融公平性引入住房公積金政策的評(píng)價(jià),從機(jī)會(huì)的公平、規(guī)則層面的公平、使用層面的公平三個(gè)視角闡述住房公積金政策的公平性。采用中國(guó)家庭金融調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù),以是否繳存住房公積金和公積金繳存額為替代變量,運(yùn)用Probit和Tobit模型,考察了教育程度、單位性質(zhì)以及工資水平對(duì)住房公積金金融公平性的影響。為了研究住房公積金政策實(shí)際運(yùn)營(yíng)中的金融公平性,本文選擇馬鞍山市作為研究對(duì)象,分析住房公積金在資金歸集、使用、增值收益等方面存在的金融公平性問(wèn)題。通過(guò)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),該市住房公積金的運(yùn)營(yíng)當(dāng)中存在金融公平缺失的問(wèn)題。為促進(jìn)住房公積金政策的金融公平性,該市實(shí)行了一系列的舉措和出臺(tái)相關(guān)政策,本文對(duì)這些舉措和政策進(jìn)行了論述,分析了其必要性和產(chǎn)生的效果。本文的研究有助于政府更深層次的了解住房公積金運(yùn)營(yíng)的金融公平性問(wèn)題,引發(fā)政策制定者對(duì)住房公積金問(wèn)題的思考,使住房公積金政策向更公平的方向發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The housing accumulation fund system has played an important role in helping workers to solve the housing problems and improving the living environment. It has promoted the construction of urbanization in China and has developed into an important part of the housing security system in our country. However, in the process of the development of housing provident fund policy, the problems existing in the current housing provident fund policy are also gradually highlighted, and there are many problems of financial fairness in the operation of housing provident fund. The housing accumulation fund should focus on solving the housing problem of the middle and low income workers, but in the actual operation, the benefits are biased towards the middle and high income groups, and even the problem of "robbing the poor and helping the rich" appears. The topic of financial fairness of housing provident fund has become the focus of discussion, and some people even proposed that the policy of housing accumulation fund should be abolished, which has attracted the attention of academia and government. Based on the concept of financial fairness, this paper introduces financial fairness into the evaluation of housing provident fund policy, and expounds the fairness of housing provident fund policy from the perspectives of opportunity fairness, rule fairness and use equity. Based on the data of Chinese household finance survey, this paper uses the Probit and Tobit models to investigate the effects of education level, unit nature and wage level on the financial equity of housing provident fund with the alternative variables of whether or not to deposit the housing provident fund and the contribution amount of the accumulation fund. In order to study the financial fairness in the actual operation of housing provident fund policy, this paper chooses Ma'anshan City as the research object, and analyzes the financial fairness problems of housing provident fund in the aspects of capital collection, use, value-added income and so on. Through the study, it is found that there is a lack of financial equity in the operation of the city's housing accumulation fund. In order to promote the financial fairness of the housing accumulation fund policy, the city has carried out a series of measures and issued related policies. This paper discusses these measures and policies, and analyzes their necessity and effect. The research in this paper is helpful for the government to understand the financial fairness of housing provident fund operation in a deeper level, to arouse the policy makers' thinking on housing accumulation fund, and to make the housing provident fund policy develop in a fairer direction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F299.23;F832.479

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪潤(rùn)泉;劉一偉;;住房公積金能留住進(jìn)城流動(dòng)人口嗎?——基于戶籍差異視角的比較分析[J];人口與經(jīng)濟(jì);2017年01期

2 陳峰;鄧保同;;住房公積金貸款新政的公平與效率分析[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2016年08期

3 陳峰;鄧保同;;住房公積金制度普惠的測(cè)度與評(píng)估[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年01期

4 竇鵬娟;;消費(fèi)金融公平發(fā)展的法律突破路徑——基于普惠金融視角的思考[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2014年04期

5 李玉福;;如何做好住房公積金歸集擴(kuò)面工作[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年05期

6 陳友華;;住房公積金制度:問(wèn)題、出路與思考[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年03期

7 詹云燕;;對(duì)住房公積金“擴(kuò)面”的冷思考[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2012年23期

8 況偉大;李濤;;土地出讓方式、地價(jià)與房?jī)r(jià)[J];金融研究;2012年08期

9 朱婷;;公積金貸款標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模型化的一個(gè)嘗試[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2012年02期

10 肖作平;尹林輝;;我國(guó)住房公積金繳存比例的影響因素研究——基于34個(gè)大中城市的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年S1期

，

本文編號(hào)：1936912