發(fā)布時間：2018-05-08 22:30

  本文選題：商業(yè)銀行 + 流動性風險管理�。� 參考：《首都經濟貿易大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在商業(yè)銀行經營環(huán)境越發(fā)復雜的背景下,流動性沖擊越發(fā)頻繁,流動性風險管理的重要性不容忽視。2013年“錢荒”事件表明,我國商業(yè)銀行在經營過程中也會出現流動性短缺,面臨流動性風險的局面。流動性風險突發(fā)性強且具有傳染性,一旦出現對銀行體系乃至整個金融市場都會造成很大的沖擊,因此,加強對流動性風險的研究與管理具有十分重要的現實意義。當前,受到經濟增速放緩、金融脫媒加快、利率市場化等不穩(wěn)定因素的影響,我國商業(yè)銀行面臨的流動性風險及其管理難度增大。本文分析了當前我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險的現狀及管理中存在的問題,在現狀分析的基礎上,選取6家大型商業(yè)銀行與30家中小型商業(yè)銀行作為研究對象,建立面板回歸模型實證檢驗各項風險因素對我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險的影響程度�；诨貧w結果,對大型、中小型兩類商業(yè)銀行進行壓力測試,測試結果表明:在重度壓力情景下,存款增速放緩、凈息差縮窄、同業(yè)負債比例與同業(yè)拆借利率交互項的增大會引發(fā)流動性風險。同時,中小商業(yè)銀行占比較高的同業(yè)負債對流動性比例的降低起到更為顯著的影響,加大了流動性風險的管理難度。通過壓力測試可以得知,目前我國商業(yè)銀行整體上雖然不會出現較大的流動性危機,但是商業(yè)銀行仍需要加強壓力情景下流動性風險的管理,重點防范重度壓力情景下可能出現的流動性風險。結合壓力測試得出的分析結果,本文針對我國商業(yè)銀行當前流動性風險管理存在的問題,分別對商業(yè)銀行和監(jiān)管機構提出了加強流動性風險管理的對策建議:一方面,商業(yè)銀行必須加強流動性風險管理的主動性,強化風險防范意識;定期、主動開展壓力測試,強化對中長期風險的預測與控制;在經營過程中拓寬客戶渠道,增加穩(wěn)定資金來源;積極開展創(chuàng)新中間業(yè)務,逐步降低對傳統(tǒng)存貸息差收入的依賴;高度重視同業(yè)業(yè)務風險,加強期限錯配管理,控制好流動性風險。另一方面,監(jiān)管機構需要完善并加強流動性風險的監(jiān)管,健全壓力測試管理體系。
[Abstract]:Under the background of more and more complex business environment of commercial banks, liquidity shocks become more and more frequent, and the importance of liquidity risk management can not be ignored. The "money shortage" incident in 2013 shows that there will also be liquidity shortage in the course of operation of commercial banks in China. Facing liquidity risk. Liquidity risk is sudden and infectious, once it appears, it will have a great impact on the banking system and even the whole financial market. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to strengthen the research and management of liquidity risk. At present, influenced by the economic growth rate, financial disintermediation, interest rate marketization and other unstable factors, China's commercial banks are facing liquidity risks and management difficulties. This paper analyzes the current situation of liquidity risk and the existing problems in the management of commercial banks in China. On the basis of the analysis of the current situation, 6 large commercial banks and 30 small and medium-sized commercial banks are selected as the research objects. A panel regression model is established to test the influence of various risk factors on liquidity risk of commercial banks in China. Based on the regression results, two types of commercial banks, large, medium and small, were tested under stress. The results showed that the growth rate of deposits slowed down and the net interest margin narrowed under the heavy stress situation. The increase of interbank debt ratio and interbank offered rate interaction will lead to liquidity risk. At the same time, medium and small commercial banks account for a higher level of interbank debt, which has a more significant impact on the reduction of liquidity ratio, and increases the difficulty of liquidity risk management. Through the stress test, we can know that although there will not be a large liquidity crisis in China's commercial banks as a whole, commercial banks still need to strengthen the management of liquidity risk under the pressure scenario. Focus on the risk of liquidity under heavy stress scenarios. According to the analysis result of the stress test, this paper puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions of strengthening liquidity risk management for commercial banks and regulators in view of the problems existing in the current liquidity risk management of commercial banks in China: on the one hand, Commercial banks must strengthen the initiative of liquidity risk management, strengthen the awareness of risk prevention, carry out stress tests regularly, strengthen the prediction and control of medium- and long-term risks, broaden customer channels in the process of operation. To increase stable sources of funds; to actively develop innovative intermediate business, gradually reduce the dependence on traditional deposit and loan interest income; attach great importance to the business risk of the same industry, strengthen term mismatch management, control liquidity risk. On the other hand, regulators need to improve and strengthen the regulation of liquidity risk, and improve the stress test management system.
【學位授予單位】：首都經濟貿易大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F832.33;F272.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黃志凌;;我國商業(yè)銀行表外業(yè)務的屬性、風險與監(jiān)管研究[J];金融監(jiān)管研究;2016年12期

2 張萌;;銀行同業(yè)違約情景下的流動性風險壓力測試[J];經濟問題探索;2016年12期

3 宋良榮;王文碩;陳錦磊;;基于流動性覆蓋率的商業(yè)銀行壓力測試實證研究[J];金融監(jiān)管研究;2016年05期

4 胡德寶;王曉彥;;巴塞爾協(xié)議Ⅲ框架下的流動性風險監(jiān)管:機理、影響與國際經驗[J];南方金融;2016年02期

5 高波;任若恩;;基于時變Copula模型的系統(tǒng)流動性風險研究[J];國際金融研究;2015年12期

6 肖崎;廖妍婷;;后危機時代我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險的成因及管理[J];武漢金融;2015年07期

7 楊勝剛;劉亞之;;我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險壓力測試[J];吉首大學學報(社會科學版);2015年03期

8 王燕;;壓力測試:城市商業(yè)銀行流動性風險案例[J];金融理論與實踐;2014年11期

9 彭建剛;王佳;鄒克;;宏觀審慎視角下存貸期限錯配流動性風險的識別與控制[J];財經理論與實踐;2014年04期

10 周凱;袁媛;;商業(yè)銀行動態(tài)流動性風險壓力測試應用研究[J];審計與經濟研究;2014年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 曹軼;壓力測試在我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險管理中的應用研究[D];山西財經大學;2016年

2 朱笑悅;新形勢下我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險及其管理研究[D];浙江大學;2015年

3 楊亞;基于巴塞爾協(xié)議Ⅲ的我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險管理研究[D];蘇州大學;2015年

4 楊娟;新監(jiān)管框架下我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險壓力測試應用研究[D];中國海洋大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1863381