本文選題：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融模式 + 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融監(jiān)管��； 參考：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,傳統(tǒng)金融行業(yè)與以互聯(lián)網(wǎng)為代表的信息科技,特別是移動(dòng)支付、社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)和“大數(shù)據(jù)”等相結(jié)合產(chǎn)生了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融。作為一項(xiàng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)與金融業(yè)務(wù)交叉的金融創(chuàng)新,以第三方支付、人人貸、眾籌融資、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)貨幣基金和網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行等為代表的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融模式從誕生到呈業(yè)態(tài)發(fā)展,對(duì)傳統(tǒng)金融行業(yè)的發(fā)展、政府的貨幣政策、監(jiān)管部門的監(jiān)管以及消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)均產(chǎn)生了重要影響,但由于與傳統(tǒng)金融行業(yè)存在較大的差別,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融又面臨著特殊風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 一是技術(shù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融機(jī)構(gòu)使用的以金融軟硬件為代表的服務(wù)設(shè)備多引自國(guó)外,由于國(guó)內(nèi)密鑰管理及加密技術(shù)相對(duì)不完善,無(wú)法充分保障交易主體的資金安全,引起互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融系統(tǒng)性的安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 二是業(yè)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融準(zhǔn)入機(jī)制不規(guī)范、管理制度缺失,從而使我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融一直游走于法律的灰色地帶。我國(guó)沒(méi)有完善的個(gè)人信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)制,很難獲得比較可靠的個(gè)人信用評(píng)分,從而要求我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)一方面提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融相關(guān)業(yè)務(wù)；另一方面通過(guò)線上、線下等各種手段收集客戶的信用信息,而這種信息搜集方式增加了產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈的環(huán)節(jié)和企業(yè)的運(yùn)營(yíng)成本,不利于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融行業(yè)的發(fā)展。 三是法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn),由于我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融行業(yè)正處于發(fā)展初期,各種法律規(guī)范相對(duì)短缺。目前我國(guó)法律制度主要針對(duì)金融機(jī)構(gòu)的網(wǎng)上服務(wù)進(jìn)行規(guī)范,對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融各種模式的市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入機(jī)制、交易資金監(jiān)管機(jī)制和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估機(jī)制處于空白階段。 因此,既要使互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融充分服務(wù)于我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì),特別是發(fā)揮促進(jìn)中小企業(yè)融資和拓寬個(gè)人投資渠道的作用,同時(shí)又要強(qiáng)化對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融面臨的各種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的監(jiān)管。本文通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融模式及政府監(jiān)管的差異比較,指出中國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融發(fā)展的不足,通過(guò)歸納國(guó)外互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展及監(jiān)管的經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出了相應(yīng)的對(duì)策。以求對(duì)中國(guó)發(fā)展互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融有一定借鑒作用,從而促使互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融提供更完善的服務(wù)。 本文分為五個(gè)部分：第一部分是引言,介紹選題背景與意義,國(guó)內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn)綜述和創(chuàng)新與不足；第二部分對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融中的第三方支付、人人貸、眾籌融資、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)貨幣基金和網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行在國(guó)內(nèi)外的發(fā)展模式進(jìn)行了論述,并根據(jù)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外模式之間的差異比較,梳理了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融在我國(guó)的獨(dú)特發(fā)展歷程,進(jìn)而提出我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融所面臨的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)；第三部分主要是從監(jiān)管原則、監(jiān)管主體、監(jiān)管目標(biāo)和監(jiān)管手段等角度論述了美國(guó)、歐盟等西方國(guó)家對(duì)不同互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融模式所采取的監(jiān)管措施,并且分析了我國(guó)當(dāng)前互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融監(jiān)管的困境；第四部分總結(jié)了國(guó)外互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融發(fā)展模式及政府監(jiān)管經(jīng)驗(yàn),針對(duì)我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融存在的不足,從規(guī)范互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展模式和強(qiáng)化政府監(jiān)管措施上提出對(duì)策,第五部分對(duì)本文進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:With the development of Internet technology, the combination of traditional financial industry and information technology, such as mobile payment, social network and "big data", has led to Internet finance. As a financial innovation that intersects Internet technology and financial business, the Internet financial model, represented by third-party payment, universal loan, crowdfunding, Internet monetary fund and Internet banking, has developed from birth to business. The development of the traditional financial industry, the monetary policy of the government, the supervision of the supervision department and the protection of the consumer's rights and interests all have an important influence on the development of the traditional financial industry. However, due to the great difference between the traditional financial industry and the traditional financial industry, the Internet finance is faced with special risks. First, technical risks. Most of the services used by Internet financial institutions in China, represented by financial hardware and software, are imported from abroad. Because the domestic key management and encryption techniques are relatively imperfect, they cannot fully guarantee the financial security of the trading bodies. Causes the Internet finance systematic security risk. The second is the business risk, China's Internet financial access mechanism is not standardized, the lack of management system, so that China's Internet finance has been wandering in the gray area of the law. There is no perfect personal credit rating mechanism in our country, and it is difficult to obtain a relatively reliable personal credit rating, which requires Chinese Internet enterprises to provide Internet financial-related business on the one hand, and online, on the other. All kinds of means such as below line collect customer's credit information, and this kind of information collection method increases the link of the industry chain and the operation cost of the enterprise, which is unfavorable to the development of the Internet finance industry. Third, the legal risk, because our country Internet finance profession is in the early stage of development, each kind of legal norm is relatively short. At present, the legal system of our country is mainly aimed at regulating the online services of financial institutions. The market access mechanism of various modes of Internet finance, the supervision mechanism of transaction funds and the risk assessment mechanism are still in the blank stage. Therefore, it is necessary to make Internet finance fully serve our economy, especially to promote the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises and broaden the channels of individual investment, and at the same time, to strengthen the supervision of various risks faced by Internet finance. This paper points out the deficiency of the development of Internet finance in China by comparing the differences between domestic and foreign Internet financial models and government supervision, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures by summing up the experience of the development and supervision of internet in foreign countries. In order to promote the development of Internet finance in China, it can provide more perfect services. This article is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, introduces the background and significance of the topic, domestic and foreign literature review and innovation and deficiencies; the second part of the third party payment in Internet finance, everyone loans, crowdfunding, This paper discusses the development models of Internet Monetary Fund and Internet Bank at home and abroad, and combs the unique development course of Internet Finance in China according to the differences between the models at home and abroad. The third part mainly discusses the United States from the aspects of the supervision principle, the main body of supervision, the aim of supervision and the means of supervision. The European Union and other western countries have adopted the supervision measures to different Internet financial models, and analyzed the difficulties of China's current Internet financial supervision. The fourth part summarizes the foreign Internet financial development model and the experience of government supervision. In view of the shortcomings of Internet finance in China, the author puts forward some countermeasures from standardizing the mode of Internet development and strengthening the government supervision measures. The fifth part summarizes this article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F724.6;F832.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊興凱;張笑楠;;電子商務(wù)中的第三方支付比較分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2008年05期

2 巴曙松;楊彪;;第三方支付國(guó)際監(jiān)管研究及借鑒[J];財(cái)政研究;2012年04期

3 任曙明;張靜;趙立強(qiáng);;第三方支付產(chǎn)業(yè)的內(nèi)涵、特征與分類[J];商業(yè)研究;2013年03期

4 張正平;胡夏露;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸:國(guó)際發(fā)展與中國(guó)實(shí)踐[J];北京工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

5 肖本華;;美國(guó)眾籌融資模式的發(fā)展及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];南方金融;2013年01期

6 王曙光;張春霞;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融發(fā)展的中國(guó)模式與金融創(chuàng)新[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2014年01期

7 孟韜;張黎明;董大海;;眾籌的發(fā)展及其商業(yè)模式研究[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2014年02期

8 萬(wàn)必能;;國(guó)內(nèi)外P2P融資信用機(jī)制比較研究及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];南方金融;2014年03期

9 任高芳;;美國(guó)第三方支付監(jiān)管體系對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];金融發(fā)展評(píng)論;2012年10期

10 朱琳;;對(duì)人人貸公司法律性質(zhì)的分類研究——以“拍拍貸”和“宜信”為例[J];金融法苑;2012年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1892447