本文選題：再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略 + 制造業(yè)��； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：由2008年美國(guó)次貸危機(jī)引發(fā)的全球金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)后,世界各主要發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)受到巨大沖擊。在認(rèn)識(shí)到產(chǎn)業(yè)空洞化和過(guò)度發(fā)展虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)所帶來(lái)的危害的同時(shí),各國(guó)紛紛將經(jīng)濟(jì)重心轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)嶓w經(jīng)濟(jì),由此拉開(kāi)了實(shí)施再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略的序幕。再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略并不是簡(jiǎn)單的恢復(fù)和發(fā)展傳統(tǒng)制造產(chǎn)業(yè),而是要求將網(wǎng)絡(luò)化、信息化與智能化融入現(xiàn)代制造業(yè)中,建立新型工業(yè)體系,通過(guò)實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)的回歸與變革促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí),發(fā)展高端制造業(yè)并提高工業(yè)信息化和創(chuàng)新能力,支持經(jīng)濟(jì)的可持續(xù)穩(wěn)定增長(zhǎng)。再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略,在一定程度上促進(jìn)了各主要發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)的恢復(fù),對(duì)世界制造業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)格局產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)影響。本文分析了當(dāng)前全球視角下發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施的背景和意義,詳述了主要發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家再工業(yè)化的戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施及其政策體系,對(duì)典型發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略對(duì)于中國(guó)制造業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響路徑進(jìn)行深入探究,并構(gòu)建顯示性比較優(yōu)勢(shì)指數(shù)、市場(chǎng)滲透率指數(shù)以及可比凈出口指數(shù)三個(gè)指標(biāo)組成的測(cè)算體系,同時(shí)作為被解釋變量,構(gòu)建模型,從影響路徑中總結(jié)影響因素作為解釋變量來(lái)對(duì)被解釋變量進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,來(lái)衡量以美、德、日為主的發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略對(duì)中國(guó)制造業(yè)分層級(jí)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響。經(jīng)過(guò)實(shí)證研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)整體來(lái)說(shuō)我國(guó)中、高端科技制造業(yè)對(duì)三國(guó)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力受再工業(yè)化政策影響較大,并于2012年左右出現(xiàn)下滑趨勢(shì);各影響因素解釋市場(chǎng)滲透率效果為最佳,我國(guó)制造業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力優(yōu)勢(shì)主要集中于高、低科技兩層級(jí)制造業(yè)。同時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家人均GDP與總稅率分別對(duì)我國(guó)制造業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力有較大影響以及較小的影響;其余對(duì)中國(guó)制造業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力影響由大到小的因素依次是:百萬(wàn)人口中研發(fā)人員數(shù)、高技術(shù)制造業(yè)出口比重、科研經(jīng)費(fèi)投入強(qiáng)度、制造業(yè)每小時(shí)工資、對(duì)中國(guó)直接投資;其中中國(guó)制造業(yè)勞動(dòng)成本年增長(zhǎng)速度快于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家致使我國(guó)制造業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力減弱,而中國(guó)科研經(jīng)費(fèi)投入強(qiáng)度與高技術(shù)制造業(yè)出口比重增長(zhǎng)速度高于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家,致使我國(guó)制造業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力在增強(qiáng)。在此分析基礎(chǔ)上,本文從制造業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)、先進(jìn)制造業(yè)融合度集聚度、教育制度改革、國(guó)家創(chuàng)新體系國(guó)際化以及貿(mào)易對(duì)策五方面提出了提升我國(guó)制造業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:After the outbreak of the global financial crisis caused by the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States in 2008, the economies of major developed countries in the world were greatly affected. In recognition of the harm caused by industrial hollowing and excessive development of virtual economy, many countries have shifted their economic focus to the real economy, which has opened the prelude to the implementation of the strategy of reindustrialization. The strategy of re-industrialization is not simply to restore and develop traditional manufacturing industry, but to integrate network, information and intelligence into modern manufacturing industry, to establish a new industrial system, and to promote industrial upgrading through the return and transformation of real economy. Develop high-end manufacturing industry and improve industrial informatization and innovation capabilities to support sustainable and stable economic growth. To some extent, the strategy of reindustrialization has promoted the economic recovery of the major developed countries, and has had a profound impact on the competitive pattern of the world manufacturing industry. This paper analyzes the background and significance of the implementation of the strategy of reindustrialization in developed countries from the current global perspective, and details the implementation of the strategy and the policy system of the reindustrialization of the major developed countries. This paper probes into the influence of the reindustrialization strategy of typical developed countries on the export competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry, and constructs the index of display comparative advantage. The measurement system of market penetration index and comparable net export index is used as the explained variable to construct the model and summarize the influencing factors as the explanatory variable from the influence path to carry on the empirical analysis to the explained variable. To measure the impact of the reindustrialization strategy of the developed countries based on the United States, Germany and Japan on the hierarchical export competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry. Through the empirical research, we find that in China, the high-end technology manufacturing industry has a great impact on the export competitiveness of the three countries by the re-industrialization policy, and has a downward trend around 2012. Our country manufacturing industry export competitive advantage mainly concentrates in the high, low-tech two levels manufacturing industry. At the same time, it is found that the per capita GDP and the total tax rate of developed countries have a greater and smaller impact on the export competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry. The other factors that affect the export competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry are: the number of R & D personnel in the millions of people, the proportion of high-tech manufacturing industry exports, the intensity of investment in scientific research funds, the hourly wage of manufacturing industry, and the direct investment in China; Among them, the annual growth rate of Chinese manufacturing labor cost is faster than that of developed countries, which weakens the competitiveness of China's manufacturing exports, while the intensity of Chinese scientific research funds and the proportion of high-tech manufacturing exports increase faster than those of developed countries. As a result, the export competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry is increasing. On the basis of this analysis, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to enhance the export competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry from five aspects: the transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry, the convergence of the advanced manufacturing industry, the reform of the education system, the internationalization of the national innovation system and the trade countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F424;F752.62

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭春榮;;歐盟逆全球化思潮涌動(dòng)的原因與表現(xiàn)[J];國(guó)際展望;2017年01期

2 余菜花;周彩紅;;由中國(guó)制造業(yè)實(shí)際利用FDI下降引發(fā)的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];發(fā)展研究;2016年08期

3 韓永彩;;美國(guó)再工業(yè)化對(duì)中國(guó)制造業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2016年04期

4 紀(jì)成君;陳迪;;“中國(guó)制造2025”深入推進(jìn)的路徑設(shè)計(jì)研究——基于德國(guó)工業(yè)4.0和美國(guó)工業(yè)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的啟示[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2016年02期

5 張建平;;歐盟“再工業(yè)化”戰(zhàn)略對(duì)我國(guó)制造業(yè)發(fā)展的啟示[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

6 李俊江;孟勐;;美國(guó)“再工業(yè)化”的路徑選擇與啟示:創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)增長(zhǎng)[J];科技管理研究;2016年02期

7 孫理軍;嚴(yán)良;;全球價(jià)值鏈上中國(guó)制造業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)績(jī)效的國(guó)際比較[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2016年01期

8 李金華;;德國(guó)“工業(yè)4.0”背景下中國(guó)制造強(qiáng)國(guó)的六大行動(dòng)路徑[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年01期

9 李有;;出口貿(mào)易產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量與國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力——基于中國(guó)制造業(yè)的實(shí)證研究[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2015年12期

10 方曉霞;楊丹輝;李曉華;;日本應(yīng)對(duì)工業(yè)4.0:競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)重構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的角色[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2015年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊曉靜;FDI技術(shù)溢出對(duì)中國(guó)本土制造業(yè)出口國(guó)內(nèi)技術(shù)含量的影響研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1809541