本文選題：環(huán)境規(guī)制 + 擴(kuò)展邊際��； 參考：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制的出口貿(mào)易效應(yīng)日益受到經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論界的廣泛關(guān)注,既有成果主要聚焦于環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)出口貿(mào)易總量的宏觀影響,鮮有研究從微觀視角探討環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)出口貿(mào)易三元邊際的影響與作用。本文結(jié)合新新貿(mào)易理論,從產(chǎn)品層面對(duì)我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易進(jìn)行擴(kuò)展邊際、數(shù)量邊際和價(jià)格邊際分解,并對(duì)環(huán)境規(guī)制的出口貿(mào)易三元邊際效應(yīng)予以實(shí)證分析。本文的研究共分為六章:第一章結(jié)合相關(guān)研究背景提出本文的研究思路;第二章從環(huán)境規(guī)制的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)和出口貿(mào)易邊際兩方面歸納總結(jié)國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究進(jìn)展;第三章運(yùn)用相關(guān)理論闡釋環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)出口貿(mào)易邊際的影響機(jī)理;第四章從總體上分析中國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制和出口貿(mào)易的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀;第五章對(duì)環(huán)境規(guī)制的出口貿(mào)易三元邊際效應(yīng)進(jìn)行計(jì)量分析;第六章根據(jù)理論和實(shí)證分析凝練研究結(jié)論,并提出相應(yīng)的政策建議。理論研究部分,筆者借助HMR模型剖析了環(huán)境規(guī)制如何基于企業(yè)行為選擇機(jī)制進(jìn)而影響一國(guó)的出口貿(mào)易邊際。就經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)邏輯而言,環(huán)境規(guī)制的主要作用在于促進(jìn)環(huán)境成本內(nèi)部化,使得私人成本與社會(huì)成本相一致,進(jìn)而實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)福利最大化。從靜態(tài)角度看,環(huán)境成本內(nèi)部化引致的生產(chǎn)邊際成本上升會(huì)促使企業(yè)縮減生產(chǎn)規(guī)模,出口數(shù)量邊際減少;另外,企業(yè)的出口門(mén)檻提高,出口擴(kuò)展邊際下降。從動(dòng)態(tài)角度看,環(huán)境規(guī)制會(huì)激勵(lì)企業(yè)為彌補(bǔ)生產(chǎn)成本上升造成的損失而進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新,企業(yè)通過(guò)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新可以提高生產(chǎn)率從而減少生產(chǎn)成本,企業(yè)的出口門(mén)檻降低,有利于提高出口的擴(kuò)展邊際和數(shù)量邊際;同時(shí),產(chǎn)品技術(shù)創(chuàng)新有助于提高產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量、擴(kuò)大利潤(rùn)空間,提升出口價(jià)格邊際。實(shí)證研究部分,本文借鑒Hummels和Klenow(2005)的方法,將中國(guó)出口規(guī)模分解為擴(kuò)展邊際、數(shù)量邊際和價(jià)格邊際三個(gè)方面,以2001～2014年32個(gè)工業(yè)行業(yè)加權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化后的固體廢棄物綜合利用率作為環(huán)境規(guī)制的衡量指標(biāo),并在模型中加入行業(yè)平均規(guī)模、研發(fā)密度、資本密度和勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率作為控制變量進(jìn)行計(jì)量分析�；貧w結(jié)果表明.·環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的提高雖然會(huì)明顯抑制數(shù)量邊際,但對(duì)擴(kuò)展邊際和價(jià)格邊際均有不同程度的促進(jìn)作用;環(huán)境規(guī)制的出口貿(mào)易三元邊際效應(yīng)呈明顯的行業(yè)差異,環(huán)境規(guī)制正向影響低污染行業(yè)的擴(kuò)展邊際和價(jià)格邊際,但對(duì)高污染行業(yè)僅正向影響其價(jià)格邊際,對(duì)擴(kuò)展邊際影響不大�？傮w而言,加強(qiáng)環(huán)境規(guī)制雖然會(huì)在一定程度上抑制出口數(shù)量邊際,但更多的是激勵(lì)企業(yè)專(zhuān)注于開(kāi)發(fā)新型產(chǎn)品和提升產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量,最終有利于我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的優(yōu)化�；谘芯拷Y(jié)論,本文從環(huán)境規(guī)制和出口貿(mào)易可持續(xù)發(fā)展兩方面提出了若干政策建議。在豐富環(huán)境規(guī)制手段和完善環(huán)境規(guī)制政策的同時(shí)應(yīng)努力鼓勵(lì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新、完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)、促進(jìn)環(huán)保產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The export trade effect of environmental regulation in China has been paid more and more attention by the economic theorists. The existing achievements mainly focus on the macro impact of environmental regulation on the total export trade.Few studies have explored the impact and effect of environmental regulation on the ternary margin of export trade from a micro perspective.Based on the new and new trade theory, this paper analyzes the ternary marginal effect of environmental regulation on export trade by expanding the margin of China's export trade from the product level, dividing the margin of quantity and price, and analyzing the ternary marginal effect of environmental regulation on export trade.The research of this paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter combines with the relevant research background to put forward the research ideas of this paper; the second chapter summarizes the domestic and foreign related research progress from the trade effect of environmental regulation and the marginal of export trade.The third chapter explains the influence mechanism of environmental regulation on the marginal of export trade by using relevant theories, the fourth chapter analyzes the current situation of environmental regulation and export trade in China as a whole.The fifth chapter analyzes the ternary marginal effect of environmental regulation on export trade, and the sixth chapter analyzes the conclusion of the research based on theory and empirical analysis, and puts forward the corresponding policy recommendations.In the theoretical research part, the author analyzes how the environmental regulation based on the enterprise behavior choice mechanism affects a country's export trade margin with the help of HMR model.As far as economic logic is concerned, the main function of environmental regulation is to promote the internalization of environmental cost, to make private cost consistent with social cost, and to realize the maximization of social welfare.From the static point of view, the increase of marginal cost of production caused by internalization of environmental cost will urge enterprises to reduce the scale of production and reduce the marginal amount of export. In addition, the threshold of export is raised and the marginal margin of export expansion decreases.From a dynamic point of view, environmental regulation will encourage enterprises to innovate to compensate for the loss caused by rising production costs. Through technological innovation, enterprises can increase productivity and reduce production costs, and the export threshold of enterprises will be lowered.At the same time, product technological innovation is helpful to improve product quality, expand profit margin and increase export price margin.In the part of empirical research, this paper uses the method of Hummels and Klenowan 2005 to divide the scale of China's export into three aspects: expanded marginal, quantitative marginal and price marginal.The comprehensive utilization ratio of solid waste from 32 industrial industries in 2001-2014 was taken as the measure of environmental regulation, and the average scale of industry and the density of R & D were added to the model.Capital density and labor productivity are used as control variables for econometric analysis.The regression results show that the increase of environmental regulation intensity can obviously restrain the margin of quantity, but it can promote the margin of expansion and the margin of price to some extent, and the ternary marginal effect of export trade of environmental regulation is obviously different in industry.Environmental regulation positively affects the expansion margin and the price margin of the low pollution industry, but only positively affects the price margin of the high pollution industry, but has little effect on the expansion margin.Generally speaking, strengthening environmental regulation will restrain the margin of export quantity to a certain extent, but it will encourage enterprises to focus on developing new products and improving product quality, which is beneficial to the optimization of export trade structure in China.Based on the research conclusions, this paper puts forward some policy suggestions from the aspects of environmental regulation and sustainable development of export trade.While enriching the means of environmental regulation and perfecting the policy of environmental regulation, we should strive to encourage enterprises to innovate, perfect the protection of intellectual property and promote the development of environmental protection industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F752.62

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尹顯萍;;環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)貿(mào)易的影響——以中國(guó)與歐盟商品貿(mào)易為例[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年07期

2 王愛(ài)蘭;;論政府環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的提升——基于“波特假設(shè)”理論驗(yàn)證的影響因素分析[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

3 郭慶;;環(huán)境規(guī)制中的規(guī)制俘獲與對(duì)策研究[J];山東經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年02期

4 劉研華;王宏志;;我國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制效率的變化趨勢(shì)及對(duì)策研究[J];生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年11期

5 陳瑩;;我國(guó)對(duì)企業(yè)的環(huán)境規(guī)制效率分析[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2010年09期

6 葉祥松;彭良燕;;我國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制的規(guī)制效率研究——基于1999—2008年我國(guó)省際面板數(shù)據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2011年06期

7 李順毅;;環(huán)境規(guī)制有利于提高我國(guó)工業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新能力嗎?——基于中國(guó)省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];天府新論;2011年06期

8 彭囝囡;;環(huán)境規(guī)制的綜合理論研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年03期

9 郭慶;;基于委托代理視角的環(huán)境規(guī)制監(jiān)督系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理評(píng)論;2012年06期

10 楊濤;環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)中國(guó)對(duì)外貿(mào)易影響的實(shí)證分析[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2003年10期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 奧野利文;;日本の環(huán)境規(guī)制[A];中國(guó)聚氨酯工業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)第十三次年會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

2 孫林霞;吳獻(xiàn)金;;湖南省環(huán)境規(guī)制與外商直接投資的協(xié)整分析[A];2006年中國(guó)可持續(xù)發(fā)展論壇——中國(guó)可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究會(huì)2006學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與人文關(guān)懷專(zhuān)輯[C];2006年

3 李小平;盧現(xiàn)祥;陶小琴;;環(huán)境規(guī)制影響了中國(guó)工業(yè)行業(yè)的利潤(rùn)水平嗎?[A];21世紀(jì)數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)（第13卷）[C];2012年

4 姚圣;;政治關(guān)聯(lián)緩沖、環(huán)境規(guī)制軟約束與環(huán)境會(huì)計(jì)控制[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)環(huán)境會(huì)計(jì)專(zhuān)業(yè)委員會(huì)2011學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

5 葉祥松;;不同環(huán)境規(guī)制下的規(guī)制效率與全要素生產(chǎn)率研究——基于我國(guó)東、中、西部地區(qū)1999-2008年的實(shí)證分析[A];市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)與增長(zhǎng)質(zhì)量——2013年嶺南經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇暨廣東經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)年會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

6 王嶺;;環(huán)境規(guī)制、公眾參與和環(huán)境污染治理——基于中國(guó)省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[A];2010年中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)組織前沿論壇會(huì)議文集[C];2010年

7 曾文慧;;流域越界污染規(guī)制:對(duì)中國(guó)跨省水污染的實(shí)證研究[A];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)（季刊）第7卷第2期[C];2008年

8 肖鵬;胡許萍;;環(huán)境規(guī)制差異對(duì)我國(guó)跨國(guó)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響:基于海爾的探索性案例研究[A];第八屆（2013）中國(guó)管理學(xué)年會(huì)——管理案例研究分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2013年

9 葉元煦;汪濤;韓威;;大國(guó)區(qū)域間經(jīng)濟(jì)與環(huán)境可持續(xù)發(fā)展對(duì)策分析[A];系統(tǒng)工程與可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略——中國(guó)系統(tǒng)工程學(xué)會(huì)第十屆年會(huì)論文集[C];1998年

10 王鵬;高妍伶俐;;環(huán)境規(guī)制與我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的區(qū)域差異研究——基于東、中、西部地區(qū)三次產(chǎn)業(yè)部門(mén)的數(shù)據(jù)分析[A];外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說(shuō)與中國(guó)研究報(bào)告[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前9條

1 南開(kāi)大學(xué)中國(guó)城市與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)研究中心 王家庭　孫哲;環(huán)境規(guī)制如何推動(dòng)區(qū)域創(chuàng)新？[N];中國(guó)環(huán)境報(bào);2013年

2 張Z，

本文編號(hào)：1741300