本文選題：服務(wù)業(yè)集聚　切入點(diǎn)：戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)向服務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)的轉(zhuǎn)變,一方面使得服務(wù)業(yè)集聚發(fā)展成為各國(guó)、各地區(qū)實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的重要途徑,另一方面產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)、資源環(huán)境壓力的不斷上升,使得戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)成為地區(qū)新的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)點(diǎn),而構(gòu)建集聚區(qū)是實(shí)現(xiàn)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的有效方式。那么,已具備一定集聚規(guī)模的服務(wù)業(yè)會(huì)對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集中布局產(chǎn)生怎樣的影響呢?本文認(rèn)為,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)基于投入產(chǎn)出關(guān)系實(shí)現(xiàn)協(xié)同集聚;生活性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚通過提供多樣化和一站式的生活服務(wù)供給來(lái)降低地區(qū)生活成本、提高生活質(zhì)量以提升居民幸福指數(shù),進(jìn)而促進(jìn)勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率提升和創(chuàng)新能力迸發(fā)、減少高素質(zhì)勞動(dòng)力外流并吸引創(chuàng)新人才流入間接促進(jìn)以技術(shù)、創(chuàng)新為核心投入要素的戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)與其協(xié)同布局;而生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)和生活性服務(wù)業(yè)的協(xié)同集聚有利于服務(wù)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)更大限度的發(fā)揮。本文在分析了服務(wù)業(yè)集聚對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚影響的理論機(jī)理后,以東部地區(qū)和中西部地區(qū)30個(gè)省份2003-2011年的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)為依據(jù),計(jì)算了戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)、服務(wù)業(yè)的區(qū)位熵值及其協(xié)同集聚度系數(shù),結(jié)果表明:無(wú)論是東部還是中西部地區(qū)服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚度都高于戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚度,東部地區(qū)的戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚水平明顯強(qiáng)于中西部地區(qū),但兩大地區(qū)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)自身的集聚水平出現(xiàn)了小幅下降;在服務(wù)業(yè)內(nèi)部,東部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚度高于生活性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚度,而在中西部地區(qū)生活性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚現(xiàn)象從2004年開始明顯強(qiáng)于生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)。從靜態(tài)角度來(lái)看,東部地區(qū)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)與服務(wù)業(yè)的協(xié)同集聚度先下降之后開始逐漸上升,中西部地區(qū)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)與服務(wù)業(yè)的協(xié)同集聚度呈波動(dòng)下降趨勢(shì),東部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與生活性服務(wù)業(yè)的協(xié)同集聚水平高于中西部地區(qū)。在統(tǒng)計(jì)性描述的基礎(chǔ)上本文進(jìn)一步構(gòu)建了服務(wù)業(yè)集聚對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚影響的面板模型,實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果顯示:東部和中西部地區(qū)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚具有明顯的路徑依賴性,滯后一期生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚促進(jìn)了戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚發(fā)展,且東部地區(qū)的這一促進(jìn)作用大于中西部地區(qū);同一時(shí)期生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚水平同戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚水平負(fù)相關(guān);滯后一期和同一期生活性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚均促進(jìn)了戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集中布局,而且這種促進(jìn)作用在不斷增強(qiáng)。東部地區(qū)滯后一期生活性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的促進(jìn)作用小于生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的促進(jìn)作用,中西部地區(qū)滯后一期生活性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的促進(jìn)作用要強(qiáng)于生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的促進(jìn)作用;東部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與生活性服務(wù)業(yè)的協(xié)同集聚促進(jìn)了戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集中布局,中西部地區(qū)兩類服務(wù)業(yè)的協(xié)同集聚水平比較低,協(xié)同布局尚處于初級(jí)階段,并沒有對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集中發(fā)展產(chǎn)生顯著影響。綜合考慮生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚、生活性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚及生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與生活性服務(wù)業(yè)協(xié)同集聚對(duì)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集中布局的影響后,可以發(fā)現(xiàn),考察年度內(nèi)東部和中西部地區(qū)的服務(wù)業(yè)集聚總體上促進(jìn)了戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚發(fā)展。產(chǎn)業(yè)協(xié)同集聚的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)模型的實(shí)證結(jié)果表明:東部地區(qū)服務(wù)業(yè)與戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的協(xié)同集聚促進(jìn)了地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng),生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)協(xié)同集聚的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)大于生活性服務(wù)業(yè)與戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)協(xié)同集聚的效應(yīng),但生活性服務(wù)業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)協(xié)同布局的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)還沒有顯現(xiàn);中西部地區(qū)由于服務(wù)業(yè)、戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)本身的集聚水平較低,二者的協(xié)同集聚還處于初級(jí)階段、協(xié)同布局結(jié)構(gòu)不夠合理,產(chǎn)業(yè)間的適應(yīng)性和協(xié)調(diào)性較差并未實(shí)現(xiàn)良性互動(dòng),從而在一定程度上阻礙了經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng)。最后,文章依據(jù)研究結(jié)論對(duì)各地區(qū)服務(wù)業(yè)和戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚發(fā)展提出了有針對(duì)性的政策建議:既要制定合理的產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)劃提升地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)、生活性服務(wù)業(yè)和戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚水平,更要注重服務(wù)業(yè)與戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)協(xié)同集聚及服務(wù)業(yè)內(nèi)部協(xié)同布局的合理與有序;此外,還要優(yōu)化地區(qū)內(nèi)外市場(chǎng)環(huán)境和政策環(huán)境,保障資源在服務(wù)業(yè)和戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)之間的合理配置,為二者的協(xié)同集聚及其經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)的發(fā)揮提供有利支撐。
[Abstract]:The change from industrial economy to service economy, on the one hand, the service industry has become an important way to achieve development, regional economic growth, on the other hand the industrial transformation and upgrading, resources and environmental pressures continue to rise, the strategic emerging industry has become a new economic growth point and the construction area, gathering area is the effective way to realize the sustainable development strategic emerging industries. So, have a certain scale of service industry agglomeration will have what effect on the layout of the strategic emerging industry? This paper argues that the productive service industry and strategic emerging industry cluster based on cooperative relation between input and output; to reduce the cost of living area by providing life service supply diversification and one-stop life the service industry agglomeration, improve the quality of life to improve the residents' happiness, and promote the improvement of labor productivity and innovation ability and Hair, reduce labor outflow and attract high-quality innovative talents into indirect to promote technology innovation as the core, the input factors of strategic emerging industries and collaborative layout; productive service industry and service industry co agglomeration is propitious to service industry agglomeration effect to a greater extent of play. Based on the theoretical analysis of the mechanism of service industry agglomeration effect on the strategic emerging industry cluster, based on the data of 30 provinces in the 2003-2011 years of the eastern and western regions on the basis of strategic emerging industries is calculated, the service industry agglomeration and co location entropy coefficient, the results show that both the concentration of the eastern Midwest or service industry is higher than the concentration of strategic emerging industries the agglomeration level of the eastern region, the strategic emerging industry is stronger than the central and western regions, but the two major areas of strategic emerging industry itself The agglomeration level of a small decline; in the service sector, the production service industry in the eastern region is higher than the concentration of life service industry agglomeration degree, and in the agglomeration area of life service industry in the Midwest from the beginning of 2004 was stronger than that of producer services. From the static point of view, strategic emerging industry and service industry in Eastern the co agglomeration degree decreased gradually after the rise of a downward trend in volatility co agglomeration in strategic emerging industries and service industry in central and western regions, the productive service industry in the eastern region and the life service industry co agglomeration level is higher than the central and western regions. The panel model based on the statistical description on the further construction of the service industry the agglomeration effect on strategic emerging industry clusters, empirical results show that: the eastern and western regions of strategic emerging industrial cluster has obvious way The size dependence of the lag period of productive service industry agglomeration agglomeration promotes the development of strategic emerging industries, and the eastern region this is stronger than the central and western regions; the agglomeration level of the agglomeration level of producer services in the same period with the strategic emerging industry negative correlation; the lag period and the same period of service life industry agglomeration can promote the centralized layout of strategic emerging industries, and the promoting effect in increasing. The eastern region with a lag phase of life service industry cluster of strategic emerging industries to promote the role of less than the production of the service industry agglomeration effect, the central and western regions with a lag phase of life service industry cluster of strategic emerging industries the effect was stronger than that of producer service industry agglomeration on strategic emerging industries to promote the role of service; productive service industry in the eastern region and the life Industry Co agglomeration promotes the centralized layout of strategic emerging industries, two kinds of service industry in the Midwest co agglomeration level is relatively low, collaborative layout is still in the initial stage, and did not have a significant impact on the development of strategic emerging industries. Considering the agglomeration of producer services, affect the life of service industry and producer service industry and life service industry co agglomeration centralized layout of strategic emerging industry, can be found on the whole to promote the cluster development of the strategic emerging industries annual inspection in the East and Midwest service industry agglomeration. The empirical model of economic effect of Industry Co agglomeration. The results show that: the eastern region Services and Strategic Emerging Industries Co agglomeration promotes the regional economic growth, productive service industry and strategic emerging industry co agglomeration economic growth in Xiao Yingda The synergistic effect of agglomeration of life service industry and strategic emerging industries, but the life of service and production service industry cooperative economic growth effect of layout is not clear; the central and western regions due to service industry agglomeration level of strategic emerging industry itself is relatively low, the two co agglomeration is still in the initial stage, the collaborative layout structure is not enough reasonable, poor adaptability and coordination between the industry did not realize the benign interaction, which hindered the economic growth in a certain extent. Finally, the conclusion based on the study on the development of regional services and strategic emerging industry agglomeration put forward some policy suggestions: to make reasonable planning and enhance the production of industrial area the service industry agglomeration level, life services and strategic emerging industries, more attention should be paid to the service industry and strategic emerging industry co agglomeration and service industry Collaborative layout is reasonable and orderly. In addition, we should also optimize the market environment and policy environment inside and outside the region, ensure the rational allocation of resources between service industries and strategic emerging industries, and provide a good support for the two synergies and the growth of economic growth.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F719;F276.44

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;新興產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2000年12期

2 ;發(fā)展鮮花茶前景看好[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村小康科技;2003年02期

3 高天;鋁輪廈正成為中國(guó)充滿活力的新興產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];鋁加工;2004年05期

4 周良洛;;以新興產(chǎn)業(yè)來(lái)激發(fā)地區(qū)創(chuàng)造活力[J];前線;2006年12期

5 ;新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展也要嚴(yán)防“過�！盵J];現(xiàn)代電子技術(shù);2009年18期

6 ;特色:新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展之魂[J];寧波經(jīng)濟(jì)(財(cái)經(jīng)視點(diǎn));2009年09期

7 朱克江;;依靠科技培育發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的實(shí)踐與思考[J];江蘇科技信息;2010年02期

8 ;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、專家“把脈”戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];中國(guó)科技產(chǎn)業(yè);2010年05期

9 潘利;;廣東發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)要選準(zhǔn)突破口[J];廣東經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年06期

10 ;培育和發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];新湘評(píng)論;2010年11期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 吳浙;;加快天津戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的思路與對(duì)策[A];2010年度京津冀區(qū)域協(xié)作論壇論文集[C];2010年

2 韓影;貝紹軍;趙亮;;遼寧戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的問題及對(duì)策研究[A];第九屆沈陽(yáng)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（經(jīng)濟(jì)管理與人文科學(xué)分冊(cè)）[C];2012年

3 趙瑾璐;李梓伊;;北京發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[A];2010年度京津冀區(qū)域協(xié)作論壇論文集[C];2010年

4 于刃剛;;河北打造環(huán)京津戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)基地的意義、條件與對(duì)策[A];2010年度京津冀區(qū)域協(xié)作論壇論文集[C];2010年

5 鄭春東;張露露;;區(qū)域性戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的識(shí)別與評(píng)價(jià)[A];2010年度京津冀區(qū)域協(xié)作論壇論文集[C];2010年

6 張海濤;田東山;陳龍;;武漢市戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展情況調(diào)研報(bào)告[A];“兩區(qū)”同建與科學(xué)發(fā)展——武漢市第四屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

7 趙延年;;關(guān)于培育和發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)若干問題的思考[A];第八屆沈陽(yáng)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

8 郭小波;;基于戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的若干思考[A];2011年中國(guó)航空學(xué)會(huì)管理科學(xué)分會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)議論文集[C];2011年

9 黃學(xué)仁;范益民;;加快培育和發(fā)展我省戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的建議[A];2010當(dāng)代海南論壇文集（上）[C];2011年

10 丁華;;戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的理論基礎(chǔ)與研究現(xiàn)狀[A];第七屆中國(guó)科技政策與管理學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者 劉娟;搶占新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展制高點(diǎn)[N];大慶日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 江蘇省科技廳廳長(zhǎng) 朱克江;依靠科技培育發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的實(shí)踐與思考[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

3 童海華;期待戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)之花新年綻放[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2010年

4 本報(bào)記者 宋時(shí)飛;新興產(chǎn)業(yè)撬動(dòng)新增長(zhǎng)點(diǎn)[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2010年

5 本報(bào)記者 王世玲　王曉明;劉峰:新興產(chǎn)業(yè)是否過剩,資本會(huì)自行選擇[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2010年

6 鄭英;市政協(xié)舉行新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展情況政情交流會(huì)[N];江陰日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

7 中國(guó)科學(xué)技術(shù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究院 郭鐵成;從新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的規(guī)律出發(fā)制定有效政策[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

8 中共廣東省委黨校教授 蔡兵;發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)要有國(guó)際視野[N];南方日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

9 中山大學(xué)教授 王s，

本文編號(hào)：1632197