本文關鍵詞：歐盟對華瓷磚反傾銷貿(mào)易效應分析　出處：《遼寧大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 歐盟 瓷磚 貿(mào)易 反傾銷效應 對策

【摘要】：自從2001年加入WTO后,中國與世界各國的貿(mào)易往來日趨頻繁,而歐盟作為中國的主要貿(mào)易伙伴,其各類商品與中國的貿(mào)易規(guī)模均處于不斷上升的狀態(tài)。瓷磚行業(yè)近年來崛起速度飛快,在中國的外貿(mào)中占據(jù)的份額越來越大,已經(jīng)日益成為中國的重要外銷產(chǎn)品之一。然而,近年來,貿(mào)易保護主義重新抬頭,歐盟等國家打著保護國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的口號,頻頻發(fā)起反傾銷,中國已經(jīng)成為歐盟反傾銷最大的受害國,瓷磚行業(yè)也受到諸多影響。本文的選題具有以下意義:首先,我國一直是瓷磚出口第一大國,研究瓷磚行業(yè)的貿(mào)易具有非常深遠的意義。本文通過研究2010年具體案件,對反傾銷對瓷磚行業(yè)的損害做出了定量評估;其次,本文的建議和對策能幫助我國瓷磚行業(yè)企業(yè)避免反傾銷訴訟及在遭到反傾銷訴訟后有效地應對反傾銷訴訟,減少反傾銷帶來的損失。最后,本文的分析對于政府部門制定相關的政策方針有一定的借鑒意義。對于歐盟這樣一個重要的貿(mào)易合作伙伴,政府方面在制定外貿(mào)方針時應格外謹慎。本文共有五個部分。第一部分是緒論,包括文章的研究目的、意義,國內(nèi)外關于反傾銷的文獻綜述及文章的研究思路和方法。第二部分是反傾銷及其效應的理論分析,闡述了反傾銷的定義、內(nèi)涵,條件及反傾銷帶來的各種效應,包括貿(mào)易限制效應,貿(mào)易轉移效應和上下游產(chǎn)業(yè)聯(lián)系效應。第三部分是對2010年歐盟對華發(fā)起的反傾銷案件的詳細介紹,包括整個案件過程、對該案件雙方爭論的焦點及案件的裁決結果。第四部分,是根據(jù)案件的進程,采用數(shù)據(jù)來驗證之前的理論知識,驗證了貿(mào)易限制效應、貿(mào)易轉移效應及上下游關聯(lián)效應,并得出了相應的結論。第五部分是政策和建議,針對中國瓷磚行業(yè)遭受反傾銷提出了相應的對策和建議,包括政府、企業(yè)及行業(yè)協(xié)會三方面的建議。通過分析歐盟對華瓷磚反傾銷效應,本文得出結論,即反傾銷措施確實存在貿(mào)易限制效應、貿(mào)易轉移效應及上下游關聯(lián)效應。
[Abstract]:Since China joined the WTO in 2001, the trade relations between China and the rest of the world have become more and more frequent, and the European Union is China's main trading partner. Its various kinds of commodities and China's trade scale are in the state of continuous rise. Ceramic tile industry has been rising rapidly in recent years, in China's foreign trade occupies a larger and larger share. It has become one of the important export products of China. However, in recent years, trade protectionism has resurfaced, and countries such as the European Union have frequently launched anti-dumping under the slogan of protecting domestic industries. China has become the EU's largest victim of anti-dumping, the tile industry has been affected by many. The topic of this paper has the following significance: first, China has been the largest country in tile exports. It is of great significance to study the trade of ceramic tile industry. By studying the specific cases in 2010, this paper makes a quantitative evaluation on the damage caused by anti-dumping to the tile industry. Secondly, the suggestions and countermeasures of this paper can help the enterprises of ceramic tile industry to avoid the anti-dumping lawsuit and to deal with the anti-dumping lawsuit effectively after being subjected to the anti-dumping lawsuit, and to reduce the loss caused by the anti-dumping. The analysis of this paper has some reference significance for government departments to formulate relevant policies and guidelines, for the European Union as an important trading partner. The government should be very careful in formulating the foreign trade policy. There are five parts in this paper. The first part is the introduction, including the purpose and significance of the article. The second part is the theoretical analysis of antidumping and its effects, and expounds the definition, connotation, conditions and various effects of anti-dumping. The third part is a detailed introduction to the anti-dumping case initiated by the European Union against China in 2010, including the whole process of the case. According to the process of the case, the author uses the data to verify the theoretical knowledge before, and verifies the effect of trade restriction. Trade transfer effect and upstream and downstream correlation effect, and draw the corresponding conclusions. 5th part is the policy and recommendations, the Chinese tile industry suffered anti-dumping countermeasures and suggestions, including the government. Based on the analysis of the antidumping effect of EU tile to China, this paper draws the conclusion that anti-dumping measures do exist trade restriction effect, trade transfer effect and upstream and downstream correlation effect.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F755;F416.71

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉向麗;魏馨;;我國反傾銷績效的實證分析:以化工行業(yè)為例[J];當代財經(jīng);2010年08期

2 翁旭青;;反傾銷對反傾銷實施國的負面效應分析[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年09期

3 王立升;;國際反傾銷理論及實證研究文獻綜述[J];佛山科學技術學院學報(社會科學版);2012年04期

4 羅琪;;歐盟產(chǎn)業(yè)地理集中對我國實施反傾銷的影響趨勢分析——探索歐盟對外反傾銷的新視角[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務;2014年01期

5 劉愛東;夏菲;;國際反傾銷經(jīng)濟效應研究綜述[J];經(jīng)濟問題探索;2012年05期

6 劉亞軍;淺議反傾銷對進口國經(jīng)濟的不利影響[J];寧夏社會科學;2005年05期

7 曾信用;;淺論歐美國家對華反傾銷的原因和對策[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2014年07期

8 譚文亮;;歐盟對華反傾銷對我國的出口貿(mào)易影響研究[J];企業(yè)家天地(理論版);2010年12期

9 賓建成;中國首次反傾銷措施執(zhí)行效果評估[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2003年09期

10 張慧文;劉繼武;;我國日用陶瓷遭遇反傾銷的原因及應對策略[J];陶瓷;2013年07期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 薛建;傾銷與反傾銷對進口國相關產(chǎn)業(yè)影響的研究[D];山東大學;2010年

2 趙文濤;中國反傾銷貿(mào)易效應的實證分析[D];江西財經(jīng)大學;2006年

3 張?zhí)煊?歐盟對中國光伏產(chǎn)品反傾銷問題的研究[D];遼寧大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1391277