發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-25 07:48

  本文選題：FDI　切入點(diǎn)：數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展，資本在國(guó)家之間流動(dòng)的規(guī)模越來(lái)越大。對(duì)于發(fā)展中國(guó)家來(lái)說(shuō)，吸引外資可以彌補(bǔ)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過(guò)程中的資金不足，并進(jìn)一步有可能促進(jìn)東道國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)企業(yè)技術(shù)水平的提高。外商直接投資（FDI）對(duì)東道國(guó)的溢出作用從很早就受到了學(xué)者的關(guān)注，中國(guó)作為FDI的流入大國(guó)，F(xiàn)DI對(duì)中國(guó)的相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)是否有溢出效應(yīng)以及如何影響相關(guān)的產(chǎn)業(yè)自然也受到了廣泛關(guān)注。為了檢驗(yàn)外商直接投資是否對(duì)中國(guó)制造業(yè)的全要素生產(chǎn)率產(chǎn)生了影響以及如何影響，本文以廣東省制造業(yè)為研究對(duì)象，從行業(yè)內(nèi)和行業(yè)間兩個(gè)層面研究了FDI的溢出效應(yīng)，，并將其和廣東省內(nèi)資制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率的變化進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析。 對(duì)于全要素生產(chǎn)率的計(jì)算，本文采用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法（Data Envelopment Analysis,DEA）測(cè)算了廣東省制造業(yè)2000-2012年間的Mamlquist指數(shù)，并將其分解為技術(shù)進(jìn)步和效率變化。對(duì)于行業(yè)內(nèi)溢出和行業(yè)間溢出，分別從水平關(guān)聯(lián)、前向關(guān)聯(lián)以及后向關(guān)聯(lián)三個(gè)方向加以考察，利用面板數(shù)據(jù)模型對(duì)FDI溢出效應(yīng)和內(nèi)資制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率變化進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。本文還從技術(shù)差異程度、市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)程度、市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)向類型以及資本密集程度分析了不同行業(yè)特征對(duì)FDI溢出效應(yīng)的影響，文章最后提出了相應(yīng)的政策和建議。 本文的主要結(jié)論有：第一，2000-2012年廣東省制造業(yè)全行業(yè)的全要素生產(chǎn)率呈現(xiàn)出穩(wěn)定快速增長(zhǎng)的趨勢(shì)，內(nèi)資制造業(yè)的增長(zhǎng)速度快于外資；第二，水平效應(yīng)和后向關(guān)聯(lián)效應(yīng)顯著促進(jìn)了內(nèi)資制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率的增長(zhǎng)，而前向關(guān)聯(lián)效應(yīng)對(duì)內(nèi)資制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)的影響不顯著；第三，技術(shù)差距過(guò)大不利于FDI的溢出效應(yīng)，激烈的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)有助于FDI的行業(yè)內(nèi)溢出，內(nèi)銷導(dǎo)向型FDI會(huì)顯著地促進(jìn)上游制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率的增長(zhǎng)，資本密集度低的行業(yè)中，F(xiàn)DI促進(jìn)了下游內(nèi)資制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率的增長(zhǎng)。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization, capital flows from country to country on an increasingly large scale. For developing countries, attracting foreign capital can make up for the lack of funds in the process of economic development. It is also possible to further promote the technological level of domestic enterprises in the host country. The spillover effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the host country has been concerned by scholars from a long time ago. Whether China, as a big country of FDI inflow, has spillover effects on China's related industries and how to affect related industries have naturally received extensive attention. In order to test whether foreign direct investment (FDI) plays an important role in China's manufacturing industry, it has been paid more and more attention. Productivity has had an impact and how, This paper takes Guangdong manufacturing industry as the research object, studies the spillover effect of FDI from both intra-industry and inter-industry levels, and empirically analyzes the change of total factor productivity (TFP) of domestic manufacturing industry in Guangdong Province. For the calculation of total factor productivity, this paper uses data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to calculate the Mamlquist index of Guangdong manufacturing industry from 2000 to 2012, and decomposes it into technological progress and efficiency change. From three aspects of horizontal correlation, forward correlation and backward correlation, this paper makes empirical analysis of FDI spillover effect and total factor productivity change of domestic manufacturing industry by using panel data model. The degree of market competition, the type of market orientation and the degree of capital concentration are analyzed to analyze the influence of different industry characteristics on FDI spillover effect. Finally, the corresponding policies and suggestions are put forward. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: first, from 2000 to 2012, the total factor productivity of the whole manufacturing industry in Guangdong Province showed a steady and rapid growth trend, and the growth rate of domestic manufacturing industry was faster than that of foreign investment; second, The horizontal effect and backward correlation effect significantly promote the growth of total factor productivity of domestic manufacturing industry, but the effect of forward correlation effect on the growth of total factor productivity of domestic manufacturing industry is not significant. Third, The technology gap is not conducive to the spillover effect of FDI, the fierce competition is conducive to the intra-industry spillover of FDI, and the domestic market-oriented FDI will significantly promote the growth of total factor productivity (TFP) in upstream manufacturing industry. FDI promotes the growth of total factor productivity (TFP) of downstream domestic manufacturing industry in low capital intensive industries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F427;F832.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜瑾;朱桂龍;;外商直接投資行業(yè)間技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2007年01期

2 劉宇;;外商直接投資技術(shù)外溢效應(yīng)下降之謎[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年04期

3 黃靜;;吸收能力對(duì)FDI技術(shù)外溢的影響——基于工業(yè)層面及生產(chǎn)力非參數(shù)估計(jì)方法的研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年05期

4 李平;錢利;;進(jìn)口貿(mào)易與外國(guó)直接投資的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——對(duì)中國(guó)各地區(qū)技術(shù)進(jìn)步的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2005年06期

5 張希;陳甜蜜;;中國(guó)制造業(yè)FDI技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——基于蘇粵數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證與比較分析[J];地域研究與開(kāi)發(fā);2011年06期

6 楊亞平;;FDI技術(shù)行業(yè)內(nèi)溢出還是行業(yè)間溢出——基于廣東工業(yè)面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年11期

7 覃毅;張世賢;;FDI對(duì)中國(guó)工業(yè)企業(yè)效率影響的路徑——基于中國(guó)工業(yè)分行業(yè)的實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年11期

8 王春法 ,姜江;FDI與內(nèi)生技術(shù)能力培育:中國(guó)案例研究[J];高科技與產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2005年Z1期

9 王岳平;我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的投入產(chǎn)出關(guān)聯(lián)分析[J];管理世界;2000年04期

10 黃靜波,付建;FDI與廣東技術(shù)進(jìn)步關(guān)系的實(shí)證分析[J];管理世界;2004年09期

本文編號(hào)：1662187