本文選題：中國(guó)　切入點(diǎn)：印度　出處：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：外商直接投資是促進(jìn)各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的主要?jiǎng)恿χ�，特別是對(duì)于資金短缺的發(fā)展中國(guó)家來(lái)說(shuō)尤為重要。作為兩個(gè)相鄰國(guó)家，中國(guó)和印度在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展基礎(chǔ)、人口以及國(guó)家綜合發(fā)展?fàn)顩r方面都有許多相似之處。兩國(guó)同是發(fā)展中大國(guó)，也同為新興市場(chǎng)和金磚國(guó)家。近年來(lái)兩國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)均得到快速發(fā)展，其中外商直接投資對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的貢獻(xiàn)度都很大。到2012年，我國(guó)實(shí)際使用外資遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)印度達(dá)到1117.16億美元，成為世界上利用外資最多的發(fā)展中國(guó)家。從中國(guó)和印度利用外商直接投資的規(guī)模來(lái)看，印度利用外資無(wú)論從流量角度還是存量角度都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)少于中國(guó)，2012年印度外商直接投資的流入量?jī)H僅是中國(guó)的8%；截止到2012年，印度吸引外資的存量也只是中國(guó)的6%。而我國(guó)利用外商投資的效果與印度比較如何？特別是中國(guó)和印度利用外商直接投資對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生了怎樣的影響？本文通過(guò)比較中國(guó)和印度利用外商直接投資對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)影響的差別，發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)在利用外商直接投資方面的不足之處，從而為我國(guó)更加合理得利用外資、提高利用外資效果提供可以借鑒的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 論文在研究了國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)理論的前提下，首先對(duì)中、印兩國(guó)利用外商直接投資特點(diǎn)和中、印兩國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析。然后，，通過(guò)規(guī)范分析和實(shí)證分析相結(jié)合的方法進(jìn)一步研究了中、印兩國(guó)利用外商直接投資對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)影響的差別。最后，在前面研究的基礎(chǔ)上，可以看出中國(guó)的外商直接投資在規(guī)模上遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于印度，外商直接投資對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整也起到一定的促進(jìn)作用，但是，印度利用外商直接投資對(duì)其產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整尤其是對(duì)第三產(chǎn)業(yè)的促進(jìn)明顯優(yōu)于中國(guó)，從而對(duì)我國(guó)利用外資產(chǎn)生一些啟示，也為我國(guó)在利用外資方面提供了值得借鑒的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 文章第一部分為引言部分，這一部分主要介紹了本文的研究背景和研究意義，以及國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀；第二部分主要敘述了關(guān)于外商直接投資和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的相關(guān)理論依據(jù)，包括產(chǎn)品周期理論、壟斷優(yōu)勢(shì)理論、市場(chǎng)內(nèi)部化理論等，以及外商直接投資對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整的影響機(jī)制。第三部分主要比較了中國(guó)和印度外商直接投資的特點(diǎn)和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀；本文的第四部分對(duì)外商直接投資對(duì)中國(guó)和印度產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整進(jìn)行了比較分析；第五部分通過(guò)實(shí)證分析比較了中印兩國(guó)利用外商直接投資對(duì)其產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的影響；第六部分通過(guò)比較研究以及實(shí)證分析所得出的結(jié)論，歸納出我國(guó)在利用外資方面的總體思路以及應(yīng)該采取的有效對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Foreign direct investment (FDI) is one of the main drivers of economic development in various countries, especially for developing countries with shortage of capital. As two neighboring countries, China and India are on the basis of economic development. There are many similarities in terms of population and the overall state of national development. Both countries are large developing countries, as well as emerging markets and BRICS countries. Both countries have enjoyed rapid economic growth in recent years. The contribution of foreign direct investment to the economy is very great. By 2012, China's actual use of foreign capital far exceeded that of India to 111.716 billion US dollars. To become the developing country with the largest use of foreign capital in the world. Judging from the scale of foreign direct investment used by China and India, India's utilization of foreign capital is far less than that of China in terms of both flow and stock. In 2012, the inflow of Indian foreign direct investment was only 8 percent of that of China; by 2012, India's stock of attracting foreign investment is only 6% of China's. How does the effect of using foreign investment in China compare with that of India? In particular, how does China and India make use of foreign direct investment (FDI) to influence the industrial structure? By comparing the influence of foreign direct investment on industrial structure between China and India, this paper finds out the inadequacies of using foreign direct investment in China, so as to make more reasonable use of foreign capital in China. Improve the effect of foreign investment use to provide lessons for reference. On the premise of studying the relevant theories at home and abroad, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the industrial structure of China and India by using the characteristics of foreign direct investment and the industrial structure of China and India. Through the combination of normative analysis and empirical analysis, this paper further studies the differences between China and India on the impact of FDI on industrial structure. Finally, on the basis of previous studies, We can see that the scale of China's foreign direct investment is far higher than that of India. Foreign direct investment also plays a certain role in promoting the adjustment of China's industrial structure, but, The adjustment of India's industrial structure by using foreign direct investment, especially the promotion of the tertiary industry, is obviously superior to that of China, which brings some enlightenment to our country's utilization of foreign capital, and also provides our country with valuable experience in utilizing foreign capital. The first part of the article is the introduction part, this part mainly introduces the research background and significance of this paper, as well as the domestic and foreign research status quo, the second part mainly describes the related theoretical basis of foreign direct investment and industrial structure. Including product cycle theory, monopoly advantage theory, market internalization theory, etc. The third part mainly compares the characteristics of FDI in China and India and the current situation of industrial structure. The fourth part of this paper makes a comparative analysis on the adjustment of industrial structure of China and India by foreign direct investment, the fifth part compares the impact of foreign direct investment on the industrial structure of China and India through empirical analysis. In the sixth part, through comparative study and empirical analysis, the author concludes the general ideas and effective countermeasures of utilizing foreign capital in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F832.6;F124

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔣磊;金磚五國(guó)外商直接投資對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)影響的比較研究[D];江蘇大學(xué);2016年

本文編號(hào)：1661968