本文關(guān)鍵詞：從信托義務(wù)理論到盜用信息理論:美國(guó)內(nèi)幕交易監(jiān)管經(jīng)驗(yàn)與啟示　出處：《社會(huì)科學(xué)研究》2012年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 美國(guó)內(nèi)幕交易監(jiān)管 信息平等理論 信托義務(wù)理論 盜用信息理論 信息傳遞責(zé)任理論

【摘要】：頒布禁令并不等于法律付諸實(shí)施,法律離不開良好的監(jiān)管。內(nèi)幕交易監(jiān)管理論在美國(guó)的演進(jìn),說(shuō)明拋開一些技術(shù)處理細(xì)節(jié),內(nèi)幕交易監(jiān)管是可以把握并達(dá)到合理禁止目的的。美國(guó)內(nèi)幕交易監(jiān)管的制度、理論及相關(guān)判例啟示我們,打擊內(nèi)幕交易不能停留在制度立法層面,需要良好的監(jiān)管執(zhí)法;雖然內(nèi)幕交易極為隱蔽,號(hào)稱"完美的犯罪",但若能合理借鑒他國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn),監(jiān)管內(nèi)幕交易的法律實(shí)施起來(lái)并不困難。
[Abstract]:The promulgation of prohibition does not mean the implementation of the law, the law can not be separated from good supervision. The evolution of the theory of insider trading regulation in the United States shows that some technical details aside. Insider trading supervision can grasp and achieve the purpose of reasonable prohibition. The system, theory and relevant cases of insider trading supervision in the United States suggest that the fight against insider trading can not stay in the level of system legislation. Need for good regulatory enforcement; Although insider trading is extremely covert, it is called "perfect crime", but it is not difficult to supervise the law of insider trading if we can use the experience of other countries for reference reasonably.
【作者單位】： 中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：F831.51
【正文快照】： ，

本文編號(hào)：1438298