本文關鍵詞：KG銀行內部監(jiān)督機制研究　出處：《重慶理工大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 銀行 內部監(jiān)督 公司治理 委托代理

【摘要】：本文以KG銀行內部監(jiān)督機制的研究為切入點，綜合并借鑒國內外企業(yè)在公司治理結構下的內部監(jiān)督機制的研究經驗，力求找出我國國有企業(yè)公司治理中內部監(jiān)督的不足，并解決內部監(jiān)督法定機構監(jiān)事會職權虛化，公司治理權力失衡；內部監(jiān)督制度缺失，監(jiān)督執(zhí)行不力；內部審計部門隸屬不科學，監(jiān)督效能低下；內部監(jiān)督部門溝通不暢，未能形成全方位立體的監(jiān)督機制等問題。 結合KG銀行的具體實際，研究委托代理機制在內部監(jiān)督中的重要作用。擬建立以監(jiān)事會為主導的內部經濟監(jiān)督模式，創(chuàng)建高效的內部監(jiān)督機制。并希望以小見大，用對KG銀行內部監(jiān)督機制的研究成果，促進國內企業(yè)內部監(jiān)督朝著規(guī)范、專業(yè)、科學、合理的方向發(fā)展，為構建更加合理、科學的內部經濟監(jiān)督機制做出一點貢獻。主要的研究結論是： 1．充分揭示現(xiàn)行監(jiān)事會和獨立董事兩種監(jiān)督機制存在的問題，理清二者監(jiān)督職能邊界，剖析問題的深層次原因，提出完善國有企業(yè)內部監(jiān)督的具體措施，從制度根源解決監(jiān)事會與獨立董事職能重疊、公司權力不均衡問題。 2．創(chuàng)建內部審計部門隸屬監(jiān)事會的內部監(jiān)督模式，解決監(jiān)事會監(jiān)督滯后，信息渠道不暢通，責任機制不健全問題。通過建立以監(jiān)事會為主導的內部監(jiān)督機制，增強內部監(jiān)督的獨立性、權威性和實效性。實現(xiàn)監(jiān)督合力，解決監(jiān)事會是擺設，監(jiān)督流于形式的狀況。 3．對KG銀行內部監(jiān)督機制運行的經驗進行總結；問題進行揭露，，并找出其問題發(fā)生的原因；最后對KG銀行內部監(jiān)督機制的運行提出自己的建議
[Abstract]:This paper takes the research of internal supervision mechanism of KG Bank as the breakthrough point, synthesizes and draws lessons from the research experience of the internal supervision mechanism of domestic and foreign enterprises under the corporate governance structure. To find out the deficiencies of internal supervision in the corporate governance of state-owned enterprises, and to resolve the power imbalance of the board of supervisors of the statutory body of internal supervision; Lack of internal supervision system and weak supervision and enforcement; The internal audit department belongs to the unscientific, the supervision efficiency is low; Internal supervision department communication is not smooth, failed to form a full-dimensional supervision mechanism and other issues. Combined with the specific practice of KG Bank, this paper studies the important role of principal-agent mechanism in internal supervision, and proposes to establish an internal economic supervision model dominated by the board of supervisors. To create an efficient internal supervision mechanism. And hope to see the whole through a small part of the KG bank internal supervision mechanism research results to promote the internal supervision of domestic enterprises towards a standardized, professional, scientific and reasonable direction. In order to build a more rational and scientific internal economic supervision mechanism, the main conclusions of the study are as follows: 1. Fully reveal the problems existing in the current supervisory mechanism of the board of supervisors and independent directors, clarify the boundaries of their supervisory functions, analyze the deep-seated causes of the problems, and put forward specific measures to improve the internal supervision of state-owned enterprises. From the root of the system, the overlapping of supervisory board and independent director's functions and the imbalance of corporate power are solved. 2. To establish the internal supervision mode of the internal audit department belonging to the board of supervisors, to solve the problem that the supervision of the board of supervisors lags behind and the information channel is not smooth. The responsibility mechanism is not perfect. By establishing the internal supervision mechanism which is dominated by the board of supervisors, the independence, authority and effectiveness of the internal supervision can be enhanced, so as to realize the resultant force of supervision and solve the problem of the board of supervisors. To supervise the state of formality. 3. Summarize the experience of the internal supervision mechanism of KG Bank; expose the problems and find out the causes of the problems; finally, put forward some suggestions on the operation of the internal supervision mechanism of KG Bank.
【學位授予單位】：重慶理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 韓鋼;李隨成;;我國上市公司獨立董事監(jiān)督機制有效性研究[J];財經理論與實踐;2011年05期

2 杜麗虹;林粵湖;余愛云;;上市公司監(jiān)事會制度現(xiàn)狀及優(yōu)化改革——基于獨立董事制度沖擊的治理探討[J];當代經濟;2010年13期

3 逄增輝,楊旭東;公司治理模式的比較研究[J];當代經濟研究;2003年02期

4 徐子桐;獨立董事與監(jiān)事會的關系架構[J];法學;2001年07期

5 梁愛云;;對我國上市公司內部監(jiān)督制度的反思[J];廣西師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年01期

6 何孝星;關于獨立董事制度與監(jiān)事會制度的優(yōu)劣比較及其制度安排[J];經濟學動態(tài);2001年08期

7 曹宗平;獨立董事與監(jiān)事會的缺失、矛盾及其整合[J];經濟學家;2004年02期

8 孫敬水;論我國獨立董事與監(jiān)事會的關系架構[J];江西社會科學;2002年09期

9 張國慶;王清源;付啟芳;任澤寧;;試論我國公司內部監(jiān)督機制的完善[J];價值工程;2010年17期

10 劉力;馬賢明;;審計委員會與審計質量——來自中國A股市場的經驗證據(jù)[J];會計研究;2008年07期

本文編號：1423992