發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-04 05:54

  本文選題：財(cái)務(wù)治理效率 + 評(píng)價(jià)　； 參考：《東華大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：財(cái)務(wù)治理是公司治理的核心和靈魂,越來(lái)越多的學(xué)者意識(shí)到財(cái)務(wù)治理對(duì)公司的運(yùn)營(yíng)和績(jī)效起著重要的作用,公司財(cái)務(wù)治理水平的高低也是公司競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的重要決定因素。目前對(duì)于財(cái)務(wù)治理的研究少之又少,僅有的研究也大多局限于財(cái)務(wù)治理結(jié)構(gòu)上,對(duì)于諸如財(cái)務(wù)治理效率的高低衡量等研究十分匾乏。然而,效率是經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和管理學(xué)研究的核心與主線,財(cái)務(wù)治理效率是財(cái)務(wù)治理的根本目標(biāo),因此,若要深化公司財(cái)務(wù)治理問(wèn)題的研究,效率問(wèn)題就是繞不過(guò)的坎。 評(píng)價(jià)效率的方法有多種,數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法相對(duì)于其他方法而言,具有避免人為確定指標(biāo)權(quán)重的主觀性、不受計(jì)量單位影響等優(yōu)勢(shì)。本文通過(guò)對(duì)回歸分析法、平衡計(jì)分卡、主成份分析等主要效率評(píng)價(jià)方法的研究,分析了這些方法在財(cái)務(wù)治理效率評(píng)價(jià)中的缺陷。通過(guò)分析DEA方法的特點(diǎn)與優(yōu)勢(shì),闡述了將數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法運(yùn)用于上市公司財(cái)務(wù)治理效率衡量的可行性。最終遴選出最適合評(píng)價(jià)上市公司財(cái)務(wù)治理效率的方法—DEA。 本文在對(duì)現(xiàn)有財(cái)務(wù)治理相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行分析總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒了國(guó)內(nèi)外以往關(guān)于財(cái)務(wù)治理效率評(píng)價(jià)的指標(biāo)體系,從財(cái)務(wù)治理結(jié)構(gòu)和財(cái)務(wù)治理機(jī)制兩個(gè)方面選取了輸入輸出指標(biāo),以紡織業(yè)為代表,分析了紡織行業(yè)35家符合要求的上市公司相對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)治理效率的高低。本文的分析分為橫向分析和縱向分析。通過(guò)多2008年-2012年連續(xù)5年的平均數(shù)據(jù)的分析,得出了紡織業(yè)中財(cái)務(wù)治理效率相對(duì)較好的17家公司,對(duì)于非相對(duì)有效的其他上市公司則根據(jù)改進(jìn)目標(biāo)值分析,總結(jié)出了其輸入輸出的改進(jìn)要求。通過(guò)冗余分析以及縱向分析中的有效前沿面分析,得出了影響紡織業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)治理效率的輸入指標(biāo),如資產(chǎn)負(fù)債率、流通股比例、獨(dú)立董事人數(shù)以及年度監(jiān)事會(huì)會(huì)議召開(kāi)次數(shù)等指標(biāo)。通過(guò)以上分析可以對(duì)于紡織業(yè)整體的財(cái)務(wù)治理效率有一個(gè)大致的了解,得出影響效率的因素,給處于非有效前沿面的企業(yè)提出了改進(jìn)的方向。 本文采用DEA方法來(lái)衡量上市公司的財(cái)務(wù)治理效率是一種創(chuàng)新,使得財(cái)務(wù)治理效率的相關(guān)研究文獻(xiàn)更加客觀全面,為我國(guó)各行業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)治理效率的衡量研究提供了參考依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Financial governance is the core and soul of corporate governance. More and more scholars realize that financial governance plays an important role in the operation and performance of the company. The level of corporate financial governance is also an important determinant of corporate competitiveness. At present, there are few researches on financial governance, most of which are limited to the structure of financial governance, such as the measurement of the efficiency of financial governance. However, efficiency is the core and main line of the study of economics and management, and the efficiency of financial governance is the fundamental goal of financial governance. There are many methods for evaluating efficiency. Compared with other methods, data envelopment analysis has the advantages of avoiding subjectivity of artificially determining index weights and not being influenced by units of measurement. Based on the study of the main efficiency evaluation methods such as regression analysis, balanced scorecard and principal component analysis, this paper analyzes the defects of these methods in the evaluation of financial governance efficiency. By analyzing the characteristics and advantages of DEA method, this paper expounds the feasibility of applying data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of financial governance of listed companies. Finally select the most suitable method to evaluate the efficiency of financial governance of listed companies-DEA. On the basis of analyzing and summarizing the existing theories of financial governance, this paper draws lessons from the previous evaluation index system of financial governance efficiency at home and abroad, and selects the input and output indicators from two aspects: financial governance structure and financial governance mechanism. Taking textile industry as a representative, the paper analyzes the relative financial governance efficiency of 35 listed companies in textile industry. The analysis of this paper is divided into horizontal analysis and longitudinal analysis. Through the analysis of the average data of five consecutive years from 2008 to 2012, it is concluded that 17 companies with relatively good financial governance efficiency in the textile industry, and other listed companies that are not relatively effective, are analyzed according to the improved target value. The improvement requirements of its input and output are summarized. Through redundancy analysis and effective frontier analysis in longitudinal analysis, the input indexes affecting the efficiency of financial governance of textile industry, such as the ratio of assets and liabilities, the proportion of circulating shares, are obtained. The number of independent directors and the number of meetings of the annual board of supervisors and other indicators. Through the above analysis, we can have a general understanding of the overall financial governance efficiency of the textile industry, draw the factors affecting the efficiency, and put forward the direction of improvement for the enterprises in the non-effective frontier. This paper uses DEA method to measure the financial governance efficiency of listed companies is an innovation, making the relevant research literature of financial governance efficiency more objective and comprehensive, which provides a reference for the study of the financial governance efficiency of various industries in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F275;F426.81

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜啟曉;;企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)治理評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系初探[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年10期

2 李冠,何明祥;現(xiàn)代物流管理系統(tǒng)及其DEA績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年14期

3 何韌;;銀行業(yè)市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)、效率和績(jī)效的相關(guān)性研究——基于上海地區(qū)銀行業(yè)的考察[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2005年12期

4 姚曉民,何存花;公司財(cái)務(wù)治理效率:利益相關(guān)者的信息對(duì)稱(chēng)和利益制衡[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年04期

5 伍中信;財(cái)權(quán)流:現(xiàn)代財(cái)務(wù)本質(zhì)的恰當(dāng)表述[J];財(cái)政研究;1998年02期

6 余明桂,夏新平,章衛(wèi)東;董事會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)與企業(yè)績(jī)效關(guān)系的研究綜述及啟示[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2003年09期

7 郭京福,楊德禮;數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析方法綜述[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年02期

8 潘福祥;公司治理與企業(yè)價(jià)值的實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年04期

9 趙樹(shù)寬,陸曉芳;國(guó)外典型企業(yè)效績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)方法評(píng)述[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年03期

10 劉哲;論監(jiān)事會(huì)監(jiān)督機(jī)制的立法完善[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1841861