發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-28 06:03

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： DEA-Malmquist指數(shù) 全要素生產(chǎn)率 收斂 石油企業(yè) 規(guī)模效應(yīng) 技術(shù)效率 技術(shù)進(jìn)步　出處：《工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)》2015年11期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：本文運(yùn)用DEA-Malmquist指數(shù)方法,測(cè)算了2008~2014年間31家中國(guó)石油企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率,分析其時(shí)序演變及差異情況,并分別考察了全部石油企業(yè)、國(guó)有石油企業(yè)、民營(yíng)石油企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率的收斂性。結(jié)果表明:12008~2014年,石油企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率年平均下降3.3%,其中技術(shù)進(jìn)步平均下降5.1%,成為石油企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)的主要制約因素。2全部、國(guó)有及民營(yíng)石油企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率趨勢(shì)變化基本一致,均呈現(xiàn)"M"型,民營(yíng)石油企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率年均下降速度高于國(guó)有石油企業(yè)6%,高于平均水平3.3%,主要原因是民營(yíng)石油企業(yè)技術(shù)進(jìn)步下降幅度大,高于國(guó)有石油企業(yè)9.6%。3通過σ收斂檢驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn),全部、國(guó)有及民營(yíng)石油企業(yè)間全要素生產(chǎn)率呈現(xiàn)發(fā)散——收斂——穩(wěn)定的態(tài)勢(shì),又通過條件β收斂檢驗(yàn)印證石油企業(yè)間全要素生產(chǎn)率正不斷趨近各自的穩(wěn)態(tài),意味著石油企業(yè)的穩(wěn)態(tài)增長(zhǎng)水平不同,企業(yè)間全要素生產(chǎn)率的差距會(huì)持久存在。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the total factor productivity (TFP) of 31 Chinese petroleum enterprises from 2008 to 2014 was measured by using DEA-Malmquist index method, and the time series evolution and difference were analyzed, and all petroleum enterprises and state-owned oil enterprises were investigated respectively. The convergence of total factor productivity of private petroleum enterprises. The results show that the total factor productivity of petroleum enterprises decreases by 3.3a year from 1: 2008 to 2014, and the technological progress decreases by 5.1, which is the main factor of restricting the growth of total factor productivity of petroleum enterprises. The trend of total factor productivity (TFP) in state-owned and private oil enterprises is basically the same, both of which are of "M" type. The average annual rate of decline in total factor productivity of private oil enterprises is 6 higher than that of state-owned oil enterprises and 3.3% higher than the average level. The main reason is that the technical progress of private oil enterprises has declined greatly, which is higher than that of state-owned oil enterprises 9.6.3. Through 蟽 convergence test, it is found that all, The total factor productivity (TFP) between state-owned and private oil enterprises presents the trend of divergence, convergence and stability, and the conditional 尾 convergence test is used to prove that the TFP among oil enterprises is approaching their steady state. This means that the difference of total factor productivity between oil enterprises will persist.
【作者單位】： 新疆大學(xué);
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“資源型產(chǎn)業(yè)碳排放損益偏離分析及區(qū)域公平發(fā)展研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):NO.71463056)
【分類號(hào)】：F426.22

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 簡(jiǎn)澤;段永瑞;;企業(yè)異質(zhì)性、競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與全要素生產(chǎn)率的收斂[J];管理世界;2012年08期

2 齊亞偉;;碳排放約束下我國(guó)全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)的測(cè)度與分解——基于SBM方向性距離函數(shù)和GML指數(shù)[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年05期

3 梁波;王海英;;“權(quán)力游戲”:產(chǎn)業(yè)變遷中的微觀政治——以中國(guó)石油產(chǎn)業(yè)市場(chǎng)參與格局變遷為例[J];管理世界;2013年07期

4 馬榮;;中國(guó)國(guó)有企業(yè)效率研究——基于全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)及分解因素的分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年02期

5 袁堂軍;;中國(guó)企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率水平研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年06期

6 張健華;王鵬;;銀行效率及其影響因素研究——基于中、外銀行業(yè)的跨國(guó)比較[J];金融研究;2011年05期

7 劉孟飛;張曉嵐;;商業(yè)銀行全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)的驅(qū)動(dòng)因素研究[J];南方經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年01期

8 柯孔林;馮宗憲;;中國(guó)商業(yè)銀行全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)及其收斂性研究——基于GML指數(shù)的實(shí)證分析[J];金融研究;2013年06期

9 趙磊;;中國(guó)旅游全要素生產(chǎn)率差異與收斂實(shí)證研究[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2013年11期

10 戰(zhàn)pだ，

本文編號(hào)：1546063