本文關(guān)鍵詞： 河?xùn)|鹽政 隆慶 制度變遷 路徑依賴(lài)　出處：《山西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：明代是近代鹽業(yè)史的一個(gè)重要轉(zhuǎn)折期,開(kāi)中法于明初大盛,在此后的兩百年間經(jīng)歷了多次變遷,其相關(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)措施和改革的文獻(xiàn)之多,成為鹽業(yè)史上一筆巨大的財(cái)富。而隆慶朝處于明代后葉的前期,雖僅六年時(shí)間,但正是葉淇變法的開(kāi)中折色制施行后私鹽盛行、矛盾激化的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,鹽政的混亂亟待疏理。在此期間國(guó)家施行了諸多變革措施,如龐尚鵬將兩淮改為“小鹽法”以疏通鹽引；郜永春對(duì)河?xùn)|鹽政“條陳四策”,調(diào)動(dòng)商民積極性以提高生產(chǎn)率等。這些多樣化的制度安排同時(shí)也奠定了萬(wàn)歷年間推行綱鹽政策的基礎(chǔ)。所以,隆慶朝改革是“開(kāi)中制”制度變遷中的一個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn),值得進(jìn)行深入的探究。因此,河?xùn)|鹽政在隆慶朝這個(gè)承上啟下的重要時(shí)期,其制度變革的興衰轉(zhuǎn)折可代表性地展現(xiàn)整個(gè)有明一代河?xùn)|鹽業(yè)起伏變化的規(guī)律。本文通過(guò)對(duì)河?xùn)|鹽政制度的沿革、運(yùn)行狀況和郜永春變革措施的梳理與分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)多方博弈非均衡化的僵滯階段是制度變遷的起點(diǎn)和來(lái)源；并對(duì)制度變遷過(guò)程中的制度選擇和績(jī)效加以分析,以確定此次改革達(dá)到變遷中的短期均衡階段；此后運(yùn)用歷史的制度分析方法探析本次改革均衡被破壞的路徑依賴(lài)。從而解釋鹽政這一充分涵蓋政府、商人、民眾的獨(dú)特經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)象,探究社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)運(yùn)行和國(guó)家財(cái)政政策的變化機(jī)理,以及未來(lái)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。文中運(yùn)用新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中博弈論的理論思路,構(gòu)建了制度變遷與經(jīng)濟(jì)間關(guān)系的理論分析框架,并通過(guò)歷史統(tǒng)計(jì),與同一時(shí)期的兩淮鹽政改革加以比較,運(yùn)用歷史的制度分析方法,得到鹽政運(yùn)行機(jī)制中短期均衡被很快破壞和歷史的路徑依賴(lài)使郜永春鹽政變革不徹底的最終結(jié)論。這不僅能夠豐富區(qū)域鹽業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的內(nèi)容,從現(xiàn)代西方經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的新角度,去探討制度選擇與經(jīng)濟(jì)運(yùn)行的關(guān)系,解釋鹽政改革成為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展桎梏的復(fù)雜性；而且也有助于為新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和歷史比較制度分析提供實(shí)證參考,建立現(xiàn)狀分析與歷史原因及未來(lái)發(fā)展的聯(lián)系。
[Abstract]:The Ming Dynasty is an important turning point in modern salt industry history, open to Sino French Sheng Ming, in the next two hundred years has undergone many changes, many literatures related measures and economic reform, become salt history a great wealth. But in the early Ming Dynasty Longqing Dynasty leaves, although only six years time, but it is open in the leaves of Qihe zhese system after the implementation of the salt prevailed, critical period of contradictions, confusion and salt. During this period the country needs a lot of reform measures, such as Pang Shangpeng will be changed to "two Huai salt" method to dredge the salt; Gao Yongchun of Hedong Salt "Chen Sice" taking people to mobilize enthusiasm to increase productivity. These diversified systems also laid the foundation for the implementation of the policy of the Wanli salt. So, in Longqing Dynasty reform is "a turning point in the open system" system change, worth Deep exploration. Therefore, Hedong Salt in an important period of Longqing in this nexus, the institutional change of the rise and fall of turning but representative to show the whole Ming Dynasty Hedong Salt Industry fluctuation law. Through the evolution of Hedong Salt System, carding and analysis of operation situation and reform measures of the Gao Yong spring, found the stagnation stage the game is the starting point and the non balanced source of institutional change; and the institutional change in the process of system selection and performance analysis, to determine the reform to achieve short-term equilibrium in the transition stage; then using the historical institutional analysis method of the reform path of balance is destroyed so as to explain the salt dependence. This fully including government, businessmen, the unique economic phenomenon of the people, explore the change mechanism of the social economy and national fiscal policy, and the future development trend in this paper. Using the theory of game theory in New Institutional Economics, institutional change and economic construction of the relationship between the theoretical analysis framework, and through historical statistics, compared with the same period of two Huai salt reform, using the historical analysis method of system, operation mechanism in the short-term equilibrium salt obtained was quickly destroyed and the historical path dependence the final conclusion is not completely change Gao Yongchun salt. It can not only enrich the regional economic salt content, from the angle of modern western economics, to explore the relationship between the choice of system and economic operation, the reform of the complexity of salt explain the shackles of economic development; and also provide empirical reference to the analysis of new institutional economics and history comparative institutional analysis and historical reasons, the establishment of contact and development in the future.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F429

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張家國(guó),殷耀德,李紅衛(wèi);試析明代鹽法變遷之軌跡[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年05期

2 佐伯富,顧南 ,顧學(xué)稼;清代鹽政之研究[J];鹽業(yè)史研究;1993年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1526915