本文選題：電商企業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：品牌價值　出處：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前,我國電子商務(wù)行業(yè)發(fā)展如火如荼,市場競爭日益激烈,相對于其他行業(yè),電商企業(yè)面對的市場具有更高的不確定性,市場的波動相對較大,未來的成本和盈利狀況都存在非常大的不確定性。這樣的市場環(huán)境使得電子商務(wù)企業(yè)的品牌價值具有品牌收益難以確定、品牌建設(shè)費(fèi)用較高等特點(diǎn)。由于這些上述的電商企業(yè)特點(diǎn),其品牌價值很難用簡單傳統(tǒng)的品牌價值評估方法客觀合理地評價,因此,我們將對傳統(tǒng)的評估模型進(jìn)行調(diào)整和修正,以期新的評估方法能更科學(xué)客觀地評價企業(yè)品牌價值。本文分為六個部分。第一部分為緒論,首先從電子商務(wù)行業(yè)的總體發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和我國企業(yè)品牌管理現(xiàn)狀兩方面入手,闡述了研究背景;同時明確了研究目的和研究意義;又查閱了大量文獻(xiàn),總結(jié)了目前國內(nèi)外對品牌、品牌價值以及品牌價值評估的研究現(xiàn)狀。第二部分概述了電商企業(yè)的品牌價值,主要闡述了電子商務(wù)企業(yè)的品牌價值內(nèi)涵及其構(gòu)成要素,本文認(rèn)為,品牌是電商企業(yè)在激烈的競爭中脫穎而出的關(guān)鍵,而電商企業(yè)品牌價值來源于品牌成本和品牌附加價值,這一觀點(diǎn)也為后面電商企業(yè)品牌資產(chǎn)評估選取和修正評估模型奠定基礎(chǔ);第三部分闡述并評價了目前用于品牌價值評估的三大類主流評估方法:基于消費(fèi)者要素的評估模型、基于市場要素的評估模型和基于財務(wù)要素的評估方法,根據(jù)幾種評估模型的各自的特點(diǎn),確定了適合應(yīng)用于電商企業(yè)特性的模型;第四部分對Interbrand評估方法的局限性進(jìn)行了闡述,并對品牌產(chǎn)品營業(yè)利潤預(yù)測值、品牌作用系數(shù)、品牌強(qiáng)度三方面進(jìn)行了調(diào)整和修正;第五部分,引入天天買區(qū)域電商,了解案例企業(yè)相關(guān)情況,并將修正后的評估模型應(yīng)用于案例企業(yè)品牌價值,證實修正后的評估方法的可行性;第六部分,對本文的研究內(nèi)容進(jìn)行總結(jié),并對所研究的理論、方法及實踐做出展望,同時對修正后的評估模型進(jìn)行評價,得出如下結(jié)論:品牌價值的評估對企業(yè)的籌資活動、經(jīng)營活動以及行業(yè)創(chuàng)新都有積極意義;采用層次分析法可規(guī)避目前我國評估行業(yè)沒有覆蓋各行各業(yè)基準(zhǔn)信息的數(shù)據(jù)庫這一問題;采用灰色聚類分析量化品牌強(qiáng)度,對多個定量和定性指標(biāo)按照一定的權(quán)重進(jìn)行分析,很大程度上可以減少專家打分的主觀性;因此,這一評估模型具有計算簡單、可操作性較強(qiáng)的特點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:At present, the development of China's e-commerce industry like a raging fire, the increasingly fierce market competition, compared with other industries, the business enterprise in the face of the market has higher uncertainty, market volatility is relatively large, the future costs and profitability are very big uncertainty. So the market environment of electronic business enterprise brand value brand it is difficult to determine the income, higher brand construction costs. Because of these above business enterprise characteristics, its brand value is difficult to assess, objectively and reasonably with the brand value evaluation method is simple and traditional so we will on the traditional evaluation model is used to adjust and correct evaluation methods to new more scientific and objective evaluation of enterprise brand value. This paper is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction, first from the overall development situation of e-commerce industry and our country enterprise brand management Two aspects of the status quo, elaborated the research background; at the same time the clear purpose of the study and research significance; and access to a large number of documents, it summarizes the brand, brand value, brand value evaluation research status. The second part summarizes the business enterprise brand value, mainly expounds the connotation of the brand value of e-commerce enterprises in this paper, and the component elements of the brand is the key to business enterprise talent shows itself in the fierce competition in the business enterprise, and brand value comes from the cost of the brand and brand value added, this view also evaluated selection and lay the foundation for correct evaluation model after business enterprise brand assets; the third part is currently used in three main categories the evaluation of brand value evaluation method evaluation: evaluation model based on the evaluation factors of consumers, market factors and model based on financial assessment based on elements According to several evaluation methods, evaluation model of the respective characteristics, determine the suitable for the application in the business enterprise model; the fourth part evaluation of the limitations of the method of Interbrand are expounded, and the operating profit forecast value of brand products, brand effect coefficient, brand strength three aspects of adjustment and revision; the fifth part introduced every day buy the regional electricity supplier, understand the relevant situation of case enterprise, and the revised evaluation model is applied to the case of enterprise brand value evaluation method, confirm the feasibility of the revised; sixth part of the research content is summarized, and the research on the theory, method and practice make prospects, and made evaluation on assessment and amendment after the model, draw the following conclusion: the evaluation of the brand value of the enterprise financing activities, has positive significance of business activities and industry innovation; using the analytic hierarchy process can be used to avoid This problem of our country assessment industry does not cover all walks of life reference information database at present; using grey clustering analysis to quantify the brand strength, analysis of a number of quantitative and qualitative indicators according to a certain weight, largely reduces the subjectivity of expert scores; therefore, this evaluation model is simple in calculation, strong operability. Features.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F273.2;F724.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 苑毅;;垂直電商的品牌塑造研究[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2016年09期

2 曾紅;;基于Interbrand法的品牌資產(chǎn)評估方法的改進(jìn)[J];商;2016年14期

3 朱振達(dá);;B2C電子商務(wù)環(huán)境下的顧客感知價值研究[J];浙江師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2016年01期

4 李繼承;王芳芳;;基于Interbrand的我國品牌價值量化評估模型研究[J];科技與管理;2016年01期

5 王海霞;;中國自有品牌企業(yè)發(fā)展跨境B2C電商的研究[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2015年34期

6 畢孝賢;唐立強(qiáng);;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)品牌價值分析[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2015年20期

7 崔從俊;;淺析互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)品牌價值評價方法[J];中國品牌;2015年08期

8 陳環(huán);謝興偉;;淺析跨境電商企業(yè)的自主品牌營銷策略[J];江蘇商論;2015年07期

9 楊媛媛;陳選至;;華為公司的品牌管理現(xiàn)狀及對策研究[J];價值工程;2015年15期

10 李小平;;電商的今天,品牌的時代[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)信息;2015年08期

，

本文編號：1590358