【摘要】：指標(biāo)體系評價作為全面認(rèn)識事物的科學(xué)方法,近年來受到了社會各界的廣泛關(guān)注,其研究范圍涉及理論支撐、技術(shù)、方法等多方面。特別是在綜合國力評價、行業(yè)發(fā)展評價、經(jīng)濟(jì)政策與發(fā)展規(guī)劃評價等關(guān)鍵決策中起著至關(guān)重要的作用。在科學(xué)的評估工作中,對于簡單問題,用單個變量就能度量;而對于復(fù)雜問題就需要多個變量進(jìn)行度量,甚至需要有層次的變量體系來進(jìn)行度量。據(jù)不完全統(tǒng)計,1994年至今我國關(guān)于指標(biāo)體系研究的學(xué)術(shù)論文有300多萬篇,但是關(guān)于儀器儀表領(lǐng)域指標(biāo)體系研究的論文卻很少,此項研究是儀器儀表領(lǐng)域的空白。本文對儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建、評估、指標(biāo)權(quán)重等方面進(jìn)行了研究,充分研究國內(nèi)外儀器儀表領(lǐng)域的現(xiàn)狀以及工業(yè)發(fā)達(dá)國家的儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展歷程,分析了主要工業(yè)發(fā)達(dá)國家儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展數(shù)據(jù),在研究指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建方法中維度、出度及指標(biāo)相對權(quán)重確定和指標(biāo)篩選方法的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建了儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)的評價指標(biāo)體系。本文利用所建立的儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)指標(biāo)體系對部分國家儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平進(jìn)行評價并與我國的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展進(jìn)行對比。通過數(shù)據(jù)分析,得出綜合指標(biāo)體系指標(biāo)及各因素對儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展進(jìn)程的影響及不同發(fā)展階段存在的問題,提出了調(diào)整優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、實施創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動戰(zhàn)略、提升產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量效益、支撐綠色可持續(xù)發(fā)展的政策建議,并為促進(jìn)行業(yè)的信息化與工業(yè)化深度融合,推動向儀器儀表制造強國的戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)折,縮短我國儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)與國際發(fā)達(dá)國家的差距提供參考。
[Abstract]:The evaluation of index system, as a scientific method to understand things in an all-round way, has been paid more and more attention in recent years. Its research scope involves many aspects such as theoretical support, technology, method and so on. Especially, it plays an important role in the evaluation of comprehensive national strength, the evaluation of industry development, the evaluation of economic policy and the evaluation of development planning. In scientific evaluation, it is possible to measure simple problems with a single variable, while for complex problems, multiple variables are needed to measure them, and even a hierarchical variable system is needed to measure them. According to incomplete statistics, there are more than 3 million papers on index system research in our country since 1994. However, there are few papers on index system research in instrument field. This research is a blank in instrument field. In this paper, the construction, evaluation and weight of the index system of instrument industry are studied, and the current situation of instrument field at home and abroad as well as the development process of instrument industry in industrial developed countries are fully studied. The development data of instrument industry in major industrial developed countries are analyzed. On the basis of the determination of dimension, output and relative weight of index and the method of index selection, the evaluation index system of instrument industry is constructed. In this paper, the index system of instrument industry is used to evaluate the development level of instrument industry in some countries and compare with the industrial development of our country. Through the analysis of data, the influence of comprehensive index system index and various factors on the development process of instrument industry and the existing problems in different development stages are obtained, and the adjustment and optimization of industrial structure and the implementation of innovation-driven strategy are put forward. To improve product quality and benefit, to support green and sustainable development policy recommendations, and to promote the deep integration of industry informatization and industrialization, to promote the strategic transition to a powerful instrument manufacturing country, To shorten the gap between China's instrument industry and international developed countries to provide a reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F426.46

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉仁;卞樹檀;于強;;評估指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建的方法研究[J];電子設(shè)計工程;2013年01期

2 李平;王欽;賀俊;吳濱;;中國制造業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建及目標(biāo)預(yù)測[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年05期

3 李遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn);云俊;;綜合評價指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建“優(yōu)度”評價研究[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(信息與管理工程版);2010年01期

4 李遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn);云俊;;多屬性綜合評價指標(biāo)體系理論綜述[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(信息與管理工程版);2009年02期

5 趙陽華;;我國儀器儀表產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、問題及政策研究[J];中國儀器儀表;2009年03期

6 奚家成;;經(jīng)濟(jì)調(diào)整形勢下的儀器儀表工業(yè)——2008年1～8月儀器儀表行業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)運行態(tài)勢分析[J];中國儀器儀表;2009年01期

7 丁雷;車彥巍;;粗糙集方法在優(yōu)化煤炭企業(yè)信息化評價指標(biāo)體系中的應(yīng)用[J];中國煤炭;2008年01期

8 李運勝;;對現(xiàn)階段我國工業(yè)自動化儀器儀表行業(yè)的展望[J];中國高新技術(shù)企業(yè);2008年02期

9 蔡煒凌;黃元生;;基于信息熵供應(yīng)鏈評價指標(biāo)約簡的研究[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報;2007年36期

10 陳洪濤;周德群;黃國良;;基于粗糙集理論的企業(yè)效績評價指標(biāo)屬性約簡[J];計算機應(yīng)用研究;2007年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn);基于粗糙集的指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建及綜合評價方法研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

2 蘇為華;多指標(biāo)綜合評價理論與方法問題研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2000年

，

本文編號：2431040