本文選題：溫州 + 文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)　； 參考：《溫州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)作為文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的重要集聚區(qū),對(duì)推動(dòng)文化經(jīng)濟(jì)與城市轉(zhuǎn)型具有重要作用。本研究將立足于經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)大發(fā)展的背景下,通過實(shí)地調(diào)研、案例分析、文獻(xiàn)研究、比較研究等方法展開對(duì)溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展路徑的探究。本文研究結(jié)果顯示,溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)同步發(fā)展,2012年之后園區(qū)數(shù)量呈現(xiàn)井噴態(tài)勢(shì),2015年文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)孵化器屬性凸顯,園區(qū)功能屬性發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)變,園區(qū)發(fā)展路徑由企業(yè)集聚的量變階段轉(zhuǎn)向企業(yè)培育的質(zhì)變階段;當(dāng)前,溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)呈現(xiàn)出時(shí)空要素不平衡、區(qū)域分布不平衡、虛實(shí)搭配不平衡的空間特征,園區(qū)是企業(yè)物理空間的集聚,文化記憶整體性缺失。從規(guī)劃變遷角度來看,溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)建設(shè)將從單純追求數(shù)量增長(zhǎng)轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)ξ幕焚|(zhì)的追求,文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)的發(fā)展路徑發(fā)生了內(nèi)在轉(zhuǎn)變;從實(shí)踐發(fā)展角度來看,溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)的發(fā)展與溫州房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)緊密相連,經(jīng)過二房東階段、招商與簡(jiǎn)單物業(yè)階段、理念與全方位服務(wù)階段后,正朝著“文化+”的階段邁進(jìn)。通過上述研究,本文提煉出了當(dāng)前溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展的三種模式,即點(diǎn)狀模式、鏈狀模式和網(wǎng)狀模式。從空間成長(zhǎng)角度來看,當(dāng)前溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)整體上呈現(xiàn)點(diǎn)狀與鏈狀發(fā)展模式,并有向網(wǎng)狀模式發(fā)展的趨勢(shì)。同時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn),園區(qū)在發(fā)展過程中受到資源要素與主體要素的影響,各種因素通過主體間的動(dòng)態(tài)博弈發(fā)揮力量,不同層面主體或從主導(dǎo)轉(zhuǎn)向引導(dǎo),或在主導(dǎo)與引導(dǎo)間來回轉(zhuǎn)換;同級(jí)層面主體在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與共生中協(xié)同發(fā)展。當(dāng)然,研究結(jié)果還顯示,溫州文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展存在一些不足,比如,園區(qū)文化內(nèi)涵不足、定位模糊、人才缺乏等,基于這些問題,本文通過比較研究法,在引入北京、上海、臺(tái)灣地區(qū)部分優(yōu)秀文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)作為參照的基礎(chǔ)上,還提出了提質(zhì)增效、深耕區(qū)域特色、跨界融合發(fā)展、完善人才機(jī)制等對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:As an important gathering area for the development of cultural industry, cultural industrial park plays an important role in promoting cultural economy and urban transformation. This research will be based on the background of economic transformation and cultural industry development, through field research, case analysis, literature research, comparative research and other methods to explore the development path of Wenzhou cultural industry park. The results show that Wenzhou cultural industry park and cultural industry develop synchronously, after 2012, the number of the park presents a blowout situation, 2015 cultural industry park incubator attribute highlights, the park function attribute changes, The development path of the park has changed from the quantitative change stage of enterprise agglomeration to the qualitative change stage of enterprise cultivation. At present, Wenzhou cultural industrial park presents the spatial characteristics of space and time elements imbalance, regional distribution imbalance, unbalance of virtual and actual collocation, etc. The park is the agglomeration of the physical space of the enterprise, and the cultural memory is lacking as a whole. From the perspective of planning changes, the construction of Wenzhou cultural industrial park will change from the pursuit of quantity growth to the pursuit of cultural quality, and the development path of cultural industry park will change internally; from the perspective of practical development, the construction of Wenzhou cultural industrial park will change from the point of view of practical development. The development of Wenzhou Cultural Industrial Park is closely related to the development of Wenzhou real estate. After the stage of two landlords, the stage of attracting investment and simple property, the stage of concept and all-round service, the stage of "culture" is being stride forward. Through the above research, this paper abstracts three models of the development of Wenzhou cultural industrial park, that is, point model, chain model and network model. From the point of view of spatial growth, Wenzhou Cultural Industrial Park as a whole presents the development pattern of point and chain, and has the trend of developing towards the network model. At the same time, it is found that the park is affected by the resource elements and the main elements in the process of development, and all kinds of factors exert their power through the dynamic game between the main bodies, and the different levels of the subjects turn from the leading to the guiding, or to and from the leading and guiding; The subject at the same level develops in coordination between competition and symbiosis. Of course, the research results also show that there are some shortcomings in the development of Wenzhou Cultural Industrial Park, such as insufficient cultural connotation, vague positioning, lack of talents, etc. Based on these problems, this paper, through comparative research, introduced Beijing and Shanghai. Based on the reference of some excellent cultural industrial parks in Taiwan, some countermeasures and suggestions are put forward, such as improving quality and increasing efficiency, regional characteristics of deep ploughing, cross-border integration and development, perfection of talent mechanism, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：溫州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 甄杰;;城市功能拓展區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園發(fā)展路徑研究[J];上海商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

2 張潔梅;李麗珂;;河南省文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展路徑研究[J];市場(chǎng)周刊(理論研究);2014年04期

3 匡小娟;蔣蘇;曾艷梅;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)理論研究綜述[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2014年01期

4 王慧敏;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚區(qū)發(fā)展的3.0理論模型與能級(jí)提升——以上海文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚區(qū)為例[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年07期

5 劉金祥;;城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展中的問題和優(yōu)化路徑[J];開放導(dǎo)報(bào);2011年05期

6 陳衛(wèi)星;;從“文化工業(yè)”到“文化產(chǎn)業(yè)”——關(guān)于傳播政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的一種概念轉(zhuǎn)型[J];國(guó)際新聞界;2009年08期

7 褚勁風(fēng);;國(guó)外創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的理論視角與研究系譜[J];世界地理研究;2009年01期

8 樊盛春;王偉年;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)理論問題探討[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年10期

9 吳艷;陳秋玲;;基于共生理論的上海創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集群價(jià)值取向探究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2006年10期

10 王偉年;張平宇;;城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)建設(shè)的區(qū)位因素分析[J];人文地理;2006年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 馬海斌;中國(guó)高新區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的社會(huì)資源配置問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 李光耀;基于CIS理論的城市景觀形象特色營(yíng)造研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

3 蘇令銀;主體間性視域的思想政治教育主客體關(guān)系研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

4 楊文禮;信用哲學(xué)引論[D];中共中央黨校;2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 張茜;浙江文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域差異與影響因素研究[D];寧波大學(xué);2015年

2 呂彬心;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展路徑研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

3 陳強(qiáng)天;A公司運(yùn)營(yíng)計(jì)劃改善研究[D];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

4 蘇穎;淺析創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚區(qū)的地域文化營(yíng)銷策略[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

5 高程程;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的湖北文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2010年

6 翁澤益;國(guó)內(nèi)LOFT創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)的品牌化研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1890510