本文選題：訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全 + 訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全保險(xiǎn)�。� 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)是我國保險(xiǎn)公司在責(zé)任險(xiǎn)方面的創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)品,能夠有效緩解民商事案件中原告在申請(qǐng)財(cái)產(chǎn)保全過程中提交擔(dān)保的資金壓力,減輕人民法院審查擔(dān)�？煽啃缘膲毫ΑＯ噍^于傳統(tǒng)的擔(dān)保提供方式,訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)具有手續(xù)簡(jiǎn)便、費(fèi)用低廉、償付能力強(qiáng)等優(yōu)勢(shì),申請(qǐng)人在得到訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的保障后更容易在訴訟案件中維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益;近年來法院對(duì)保全申請(qǐng)所要提供的擔(dān)保數(shù)量和形式的審核越來越嚴(yán)格,在一定程度上加大了申請(qǐng)人申請(qǐng)?jiān)V訟保全的難度。由此,我國訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)在2014年一經(jīng)推出便在全國范圍內(nèi)迅速發(fā)展起來,成為保險(xiǎn)公司在責(zé)任險(xiǎn)方面的熱門產(chǎn)品。但是,由于我國訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)起步較晚,目前仍處于探索階段,這個(gè)階段不斷在市場(chǎng)、人員、制度等方面涌現(xiàn)新的機(jī)遇,同時(shí)也在騙保、惡意訴訟等方面不斷出現(xiàn)新的挑戰(zhàn)。因此本文立足于我國訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)發(fā)展的環(huán)境,分析現(xiàn)階段我國發(fā)展訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)必要性和現(xiàn)階段中遇到的問題,并依據(jù)這些問題對(duì)今后我國發(fā)展訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)提出意見和建議。文章首先整合了我國學(xué)術(shù)和實(shí)務(wù)兩方經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)發(fā)展的必要性、發(fā)展階段、發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)闡述,其次從法院、保險(xiǎn)公司、申請(qǐng)人三個(gè)方面揭示了我國發(fā)展訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)面臨問題,最后在前述基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國下一步發(fā)展訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)提出了意見和建議。在宏觀思路上針對(duì)保險(xiǎn)企業(yè)自身呼吁加強(qiáng)戰(zhàn)略定位,加強(qiáng)對(duì)法院和公眾的法制宣傳進(jìn)而提升他們的認(rèn)可度;在微觀思路上,呼吁保險(xiǎn)公司繼續(xù)完善內(nèi)部控制機(jī)制、培養(yǎng)內(nèi)部人才、優(yōu)化展業(yè)初期成本結(jié)構(gòu),同時(shí)繼續(xù)進(jìn)行產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新,提升自身競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,并以此作為我國發(fā)展訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的新契機(jī)。
[Abstract]:Litigation property preservation liability insurance is an innovative product of liability insurance in China's insurance companies, which can effectively relieve the financial pressure on the plaintiff to submit a guarantee in the process of applying for property preservation in civil and commercial cases. To ease the pressure on the people's court to examine the reliability of the guarantee. Compared with the traditional way of providing guaranty, litigation property preservation liability insurance has the advantages of simple procedure, low cost, strong solvency and so on. It is easier for applicants to defend their legitimate rights and interests in litigation cases after they are protected by the insurance for the preservation of litigation property. In recent years, the court has been more and more strict in examining the amount and form of security to be provided by preservation applications. To some extent, the applicant has increased the difficulty of applying for litigation preservation. As a result, China's litigation property preservation liability insurance has developed rapidly in the whole country since it was introduced in 2014, and has become a hot product of insurance companies in liability insurance. However, due to the late start of litigation property preservation liability insurance in our country, it is still in the exploratory stage. At this stage, new opportunities are constantly emerging in the market, personnel, system, and so on. At the same time, we are also deceiving the insurance. New challenges are emerging in areas such as malicious litigation. Therefore, based on the environment of the development of litigation property preservation liability insurance in China, this paper analyzes the necessity of developing litigation property preservation liability insurance in China and the problems encountered in the present stage. According to these problems, the author puts forward some opinions and suggestions on the future development of litigation property preservation liability insurance in China. The article first integrates our country's academic and practical experience, the necessity, the development stage, the present situation of the development of the litigation property preservation liability insurance, then from the court, the insurance company, the article has carried on the systematic elaboration to the lawsuit property preservation liability insurance development, then from the court, the insurance company, The applicant reveals the problems facing the development of litigation property preservation liability insurance in China, and finally puts forward suggestions and suggestions for the further development of litigation property preservation liability insurance in our country on the basis of the foregoing. In view of the macro thinking, the insurance companies themselves are called upon to strengthen their strategic positioning, to strengthen the legal publicity to the courts and the public, and to enhance their recognition; in the microscopic thinking, the insurance companies are called upon to continue to improve the internal control mechanism. To train internal talents, optimize the initial cost structure of the exhibition industry, and continue to carry out product innovation, enhance their own competitiveness, and take this as a new opportunity for the development of litigation property preservation liability insurance in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F842.69

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫鈺祥;;訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)可行性研究[J];上海保險(xiǎn);2017年01期

2 伊魯;;訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任險(xiǎn)與惡意訴訟[J];法制博覽;2016年26期

3 任柏桐;云月秋;;我國訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任險(xiǎn)的產(chǎn)生環(huán)境與發(fā)展建議[J];保險(xiǎn)職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

4 陸鵬;;引入訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn) 完善法院訴訟保全擔(dān)保機(jī)制[J];上海保險(xiǎn);2016年03期

5 歐秋鋼;;訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)在司法實(shí)踐中尚存的問題及對(duì)策——以保險(xiǎn)公司經(jīng)營的視角[J];上海保險(xiǎn);2015年11期

6 劉迎利;全美儀;;從比較法視角探析我國訴訟行為保全制度的構(gòu)建[J];四川理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

7 黃善文;訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全擔(dān)保與商業(yè)銀行業(yè)務(wù)創(chuàng)新[J];廣東金融學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

8 蔣吉才,危紅;論我國民事訴訟行為保全制度的建構(gòu)[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

9 吳聲華,毛煜煥;財(cái)產(chǎn)保全制度中的擔(dān)保審查[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年10期

10 史飚;完善我國財(cái)產(chǎn)保全制度初探[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2002年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉燦;財(cái)產(chǎn)保全錯(cuò)誤的法律責(zé)任分析[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2014年

2 張玲玲;民事訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)保全擔(dān)保制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

3 劉飛;論申請(qǐng)財(cái)產(chǎn)保全錯(cuò)誤的損害賠償[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

4 郭海軍;民事保全制度研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1903064