本文選題：地震保險(xiǎn)　切入點(diǎn)：多層次　出處：《西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),世界范圍內(nèi)地震、洪水、臺(tái)風(fēng)、泥石流等自然災(zāi)害發(fā)生的頻率不斷上升,給人類的生產(chǎn)和生活造成了極大的影響。距世界再保險(xiǎn)業(yè)兩大巨頭的報(bào)告,2011年由自然災(zāi)害和人為災(zāi)難帶來(lái)的損失達(dá)到了1000億美元以上,經(jīng)濟(jì)損失達(dá)到了歷史上的最高記錄,達(dá)到了3700億美元以上1。而我國(guó)是世界上自然災(zāi)害最為嚴(yán)重的國(guó)家之一,災(zāi)害種類多、發(fā)生頻率高、分布地域廣、造成損失極大。建國(guó)以來(lái),我國(guó)洪澇災(zāi)害每年平均發(fā)生5.8次,登陸臺(tái)風(fēng)每年大約7次,7級(jí)以上地震年均發(fā)生9次,平均每年造成的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失約占平均GDP的3.6%,占年財(cái)政收入的30%左右2。 在這些巨災(zāi)損失中,地震給我國(guó)造成的損失和影響最大。地震以其突發(fā)性、驚人的破壞力給人類生命和財(cái)產(chǎn)安全、經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的發(fā)展帶來(lái)了嚴(yán)重的危害。我國(guó)處于環(huán)太平洋地震帶,地震帶分布廣、破壞力強(qiáng)、災(zāi)害損失極其嚴(yán)重,并且還會(huì)引發(fā)如山體滑坡、海嘯等次生災(zāi)害。從受災(zāi)人口看,因?yàn)?zāi)死亡人數(shù)最多的十次震中,有四次發(fā)生在中國(guó)。并且在受災(zāi)較嚴(yán)重的2008年和2010年,災(zāi)害直接經(jīng)濟(jì)損失直接占到了GDP的3.91%和1.33%。雖然我國(guó)政府和社會(huì)各界都在震后第一時(shí)間進(jìn)行了積極的救援,但是由于地震發(fā)生后果的慘烈性,震后人們的心靈遭受不可磨滅的嚴(yán)重創(chuàng)傷,災(zāi)后救援和重建工作難度大,商業(yè)保險(xiǎn)公司并沒(méi)有發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用。開展地震保險(xiǎn)是實(shí)現(xiàn)減輕災(zāi)害、社會(huì)互助的有效途徑,世界上許多國(guó)家和地區(qū),如美國(guó)、日本、土耳其、臺(tái)灣等相繼建立了地震保險(xiǎn)制度,而我國(guó)尚未建立起真正意義上的地震巨災(zāi)保險(xiǎn)制度。2008年汶川特大地震造成的傷痛還未完全撫平,2010青海玉樹地震和2013年蘆山地震的發(fā)生讓又一次讓我們陷入了無(wú)限悲痛中,慘重的損失凸顯了我國(guó)地震風(fēng)險(xiǎn)補(bǔ)償機(jī)制的不足。悲痛之后我們更多的是應(yīng)該反思如何減輕地震對(duì)我們?cè)斐傻木薮髶p失,構(gòu)建適合我國(guó)的多層次的地震保險(xiǎn)制度和加快地震預(yù)測(cè)科技的發(fā)展已經(jīng)成為刻不容緩的任務(wù)。 由于我國(guó)保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展時(shí)間較短,地震保險(xiǎn)也起步較晚,且由于各方面條件所限制,地震保險(xiǎn)在我國(guó)—直沒(méi)有真正實(shí)施過(guò)。在關(guān)于我國(guó)地震保險(xiǎn)制度的構(gòu)建方面,近年來(lái)有不少學(xué)者一直專注于這方面的研究,并且也取得了重要的成果。但是,我國(guó)由于受經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平和居民風(fēng)險(xiǎn)意識(shí)所限,在地震保險(xiǎn)的具體實(shí)施中還有很多問(wèn)題需要解決,不能一味照抄照搬國(guó)外地震保險(xiǎn)制度的成功模式。而關(guān)于地震保險(xiǎn)的模式的選擇在我國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)界也一直備受爭(zhēng)議,對(duì)于保險(xiǎn)公司、政府在地震保險(xiǎn)制度中各自該處于一個(gè)什么樣的角色和定位一直沒(méi)有得出一個(gè)明確的結(jié)論。 因此,本文從地震保險(xiǎn)的原理出發(fā),論述了地震保險(xiǎn)制度的涵義,從我國(guó)地震保險(xiǎn)制度的現(xiàn)狀出發(fā)分析了我國(guó)地震保險(xiǎn)制度目前所存在的問(wèn)題。并從模式類型、立法、主管機(jī)構(gòu)、費(fèi)率的厘定等方面對(duì)境外典型國(guó)家的地震保險(xiǎn)模式進(jìn)行了比較,從而得出對(duì)我國(guó)構(gòu)建地震保險(xiǎn)制度的一些啟示。接著,筆者從政府和保險(xiǎn)公司單獨(dú)經(jīng)營(yíng)地震保險(xiǎn)面臨的理論和實(shí)踐困境進(jìn)行分析,在總結(jié)前面幾章的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了我國(guó)地震保險(xiǎn)制度具體的構(gòu)建的框架,那就是應(yīng)當(dāng)走政府和市場(chǎng)相結(jié)合的道路,具體明確了政府和商業(yè)保險(xiǎn)公司的角色和各自的職責(zé),并且論述了資本市場(chǎng)和國(guó)際再保險(xiǎn)市場(chǎng)對(duì)于分散地震風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的重要作用。最后,本文從監(jiān)管的角度出發(fā),提出保障地震保險(xiǎn)制度運(yùn)營(yíng)的關(guān)鍵是要盡快出臺(tái)巨災(zāi)保險(xiǎn)監(jiān)管方面的法律,并且也明確了NGO等在地震應(yīng)急與救援中的作用,更好地構(gòu)建我國(guó)多層次的地震風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分散機(jī)制。地震保險(xiǎn)制度在我國(guó)建立后,必將更加有力地應(yīng)對(duì)地震風(fēng)險(xiǎn),造福于民。
[Abstract]:In recent years, worldwide earthquake, flood, typhoon, rising natural disasters such as the debris flow occurrence frequency, which has a great influence to the human life and production. From the world's two giant reinsurance industry report, 2011 caused by natural and man-made disasters losses of more than $100 billion, economic losses reached the highest record in history, reached more than $370 billion in 1. and China is one of the countries with most serious natural disasters in the world, many types of disasters, high frequency, wide distribution, resulting in great loss. Since the founding of new China, China's average annual flood disaster occurred 5.8 times, landing typhoon every year about 7 times. An average of more than 7 earthquake occurred 9 times, the average annual economic losses accounted for about 3.6% of GDP on average, accounting for about 30% of the annual revenue of 2.
In the earthquake catastrophe losses, causing China's loss and the greatest impact. The earthquake with its sudden, amazing destructive to human life and property safety, economic and social development has brought serious harm. China is in the circum Pacific seismic belt, earthquake with wide distribution, breaking force, disaster losses extremely serious, and can cause secondary disasters such as landslides, tsunamis. From the affected population, the number of death tolls ten times the most, four occurred in the China. And the more serious the disaster in 2008 and 2010, the direct economic loss of disaster loss directly accounted for 3.91% of GDP and 1.33%. in our government and the community are the first time after the earthquake has been actively rescue, but because of the tragic earthquake consequences, after the earthquake people's hearts suffered severe trauma indelible, disaster relief and reconstruction work difficult, commercial insurance The insurance company did not play its due role. Developing earthquake insurance is the realization of disaster reduction, effective way of social assistance, many countries and regions in the world, such as the United States, Japan, Turkey and Taiwan have established the earthquake insurance system, but China has not yet established by a real sense of the earthquake catastrophe insurance system.2008 the Wenchuan earthquake pain is not completely healed, 2010 occurred in Qinghai Yushu earthquake and Lushan earthquake in 2013 that once again let us into the infinite grief, heavy losses highlights the lack of earthquake risk compensation system in our country. After the machine is more grief we should reflect on how to reduce the earthquake caused huge losses to us the construction of China's multi-level earthquake insurance system and accelerate the development of earthquake prediction technology has become an urgent task.
Due to the development of China's insurance industry in a relatively short time, the earthquake insurance started late, and confined by various conditions, the earthquake insurance in our country, the real implementation in the construction. No straight about the earthquake insurance system in China in recent years, many scholars have focused on this aspect of the study, and also achieved important results. However, due to China's economic development level and the residents' awareness of risk limits, there are many problems to be solved in the implementation of the earthquake insurance, can not blindly copy foreign successful model of earthquake insurance system. And on the earthquake insurance mode selection in the academic circles of our country also has been controversial. For insurance companies, the government in the earthquake insurance system in the respective is what kind of role does not draw a clear conclusion.
Therefore, this article from the principle of earthquake insurance, discusses the meaning of the earthquake insurance system, from the current situation of China's earthquake insurance system of earthquake insurance system in our current problems. And from the pattern type, legislation, administrative institution, the rates determined as compared with overseas typical national earthquake the insurance model, so as to get some enlightenment to the construction of China's earthquake insurance system. Then, the author from the government and insurance companies to separate the operation of earthquake insurance face theoretical and practical dilemma is analyzed, based on the summary of the previous chapter, put forward the framework of China's earthquake insurance system that is specific, the government should go the market and the road of combining the specific role of the government and the Business insurance company and their respective duties, and discusses the capital market and the international reinsurance market to disperse The important role of earthquake risk. Finally, this paper from the angle of supervision, the key to protect the operation of earthquake insurance system is the introduction of catastrophe insurance regulatory laws as soon as possible, and also clear the NGO emergency and rescue in earthquake, the better construction of our multi-level seismic risk diversification mechanism of earthquake insurance. After the establishment of the system in our country, will be more effectively to deal with earthquake risk, for the benefit of the people.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F842.64

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉新立;;中國(guó)巨災(zāi)綜合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理中保險(xiǎn)的角色[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2008年07期

2 周衛(wèi)東;;地震保險(xiǎn)產(chǎn)品設(shè)計(jì)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管控探析[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2008年07期

3 何小偉;;政府干預(yù)巨災(zāi)保險(xiǎn)市場(chǎng)的研究述評(píng)[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2009年12期

4 高海霞;姜惠平;;巨災(zāi)損失補(bǔ)償機(jī)制:基于市場(chǎng)配置與政府干預(yù)的整合性架構(gòu)[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2011年09期

5 孫祁祥,鄭偉,孫立明,李海濤,鎖凌燕;中國(guó)巨災(zāi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理:再保險(xiǎn)的角色[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年09期

6 蘇志強(qiáng);王冠;;美國(guó)地震保險(xiǎn)制度對(duì)我國(guó)地震保險(xiǎn)的啟示[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2010年07期

7 孫曉文;;地震風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分散機(jī)制研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年23期

8 袁序成;吳傳明;;建立我國(guó)地震保險(xiǎn)制度的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];廣西金融研究;2008年09期

9 卓志;王化楠;;巨災(zāi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理供給及其主體——基于公共物品角度的分析[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2012年05期

10 高海霞;王學(xué)冉;;混合供給模式下巨災(zāi)保險(xiǎn)市場(chǎng)的激勵(lì)與約束研究[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2012年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1609538