本文選題：民間資本 + 基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)　； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的新形勢下,世界各國都在紛紛探求經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的可行途徑,但在發(fā)展的過程中都面臨著不同程度的資金短缺問題。21世紀(jì)后,中國的經(jīng)濟(jì)實現(xiàn)高速發(fā)展,公共項目的投資需求也不斷增長。為營造良好的經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境,同時提供高質(zhì)量的公共服務(wù),基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施應(yīng)得到更完善的建設(shè)�；A(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)通常具有投資大、周期長、風(fēng)險和運營成本較高的特點,且其產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)有一定公益性和區(qū)域自然壟斷性,因此多由政府經(jīng)營管理。然而,自上世紀(jì)七八十年代以來,越來越多的國家和地區(qū)逐漸認(rèn)識到,目前規(guī)模如此巨大的基礎(chǔ)建設(shè),如果仍然只讓政府獨自承擔(dān)就會使政府壓力過大,財政負(fù)擔(dān)過重,債務(wù)風(fēng)險升高,引起一些列風(fēng)險,顯然,傳統(tǒng)的融資模式已經(jīng)不再適用當(dāng)下的需求。將民間資本參與到基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)中的方式有兩個優(yōu)點,其一,可以降低政府的財政壓力,為PPP項目融得更多的資金。其二,提高項目的運作效率與建成質(zhì)量,為社會公眾提供更優(yōu)質(zhì)的服務(wù)。因為PPP融資模式的眾多優(yōu)點,無論是在理論方面還是在實踐方面,眾多學(xué)者開始紛紛探討研究。本文采用理論與實踐相結(jié)合、定性分析與定量分析相結(jié)合的研究方法。首先,從緩解資金缺口、減輕財政負(fù)擔(dān)、建立競爭機(jī)制、提高投資效率四個方面對PPP模式下民間資本投資基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)的必要意義進(jìn)行闡述,同時分析民間資本的總量足夠大、投資基建的準(zhǔn)入門檻低、民間資本有投資經(jīng)驗等可行因素,為展開更深入問題的分析做準(zhǔn)備。其次,通過分析PPP模式下民間資本參與基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投資的國內(nèi)法律環(huán)境現(xiàn)狀、投資回報制度現(xiàn)狀、風(fēng)險分擔(dān)機(jī)制現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)存在我國PPP模式中的問題,并且分析其中原因,力求找到根源對癥下藥。接著,從法律法規(guī)建設(shè)、收益分配方式和風(fēng)險分擔(dān)機(jī)制三個方面借鑒美國、英國、韓國、日本四個PPP模式發(fā)達(dá)的國家成熟經(jīng)驗,根據(jù)我國實際情況,有選擇的借鑒與學(xué)習(xí)。最后,對我國PPP模式下民間資本參與基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)的發(fā)展提出建議,分別在完善法律法規(guī)、合理化風(fēng)險分擔(dān)機(jī)制與健全收益分配機(jī)制三個方面,以求對我國PPP模式的發(fā)展起到積極意義。
[Abstract]:Under the new situation of economic globalization, all the countries in the world are looking for feasible ways of economic development. However, in the process of development, they are facing the problem of shortage of funds to varying degrees. After the 21st century, China's economy has achieved rapid development. The demand for investment in public projects is also growing. In order to create a good economic environment and provide high-quality public services, infrastructure should be better built. Infrastructure construction usually has the characteristics of large investment, long period, high risk and high operating cost, and its products and services have a certain public welfare and regional natural monopoly, so most of them are managed by the government. However, since the 1970s and 1980s, more and more countries and regions have come to realize that if the current infrastructure construction of such a huge scale is still left to the government alone, it will cause excessive pressure and excessive financial burden on the government. Rising debt risks have led to a list of risks, and it is clear that the traditional financing model no longer applies to immediate demand. There are two advantages to the participation of private capital in infrastructure construction. One is to reduce the financial pressure of the government and raise more funds for the PPP project. Second, improve the operational efficiency and quality of the project, to provide better service to the public. Because of the many advantages of PPP financing model, both in theory and in practice, many scholars have begun to explore the research. This paper adopts the research method of combining theory and practice, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. First of all, from four aspects of alleviating the fund gap, lightening the financial burden, establishing the competitive mechanism and improving the investment efficiency, the paper expounds the necessary significance of the infrastructure construction of the private capital investment under the PPP model, and analyzes that the total amount of the private capital is large enough. The entry threshold of investment infrastructure is low, and private capital has investment experience and other feasible factors, so as to prepare for more in-depth analysis. Secondly, by analyzing the current situation of domestic legal environment of private capital participating in infrastructure investment under PPP mode, the present situation of investment return system and risk sharing mechanism, we find that there are some problems in PPP model in our country, and analyze the reasons among them. Try to find the root cause of the right remedy. Then, from the three aspects of the construction of laws and regulations, the way of income distribution and the mechanism of risk sharing, we draw lessons from the mature experience of four developed countries of PPP model, such as the United States, Britain, Korea and Japan, and learn from them selectively according to the actual situation of our country. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions on the development of private capital participating in infrastructure construction under the PPP model in China, in three aspects: perfecting the laws and regulations, rationalizing the risk-sharing mechanism and perfecting the profit distribution mechanism. In order to play a positive role in the development of PPP model in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F283

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳曦;劉依靈;;運用PPP模式開展基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)的問題研究[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2016年03期

2 周正祥;張秀芳;張平;;新常態(tài)下PPP模式應(yīng)用存在的問題及對策[J];中國軟科學(xué);2015年09期

3 施穎;劉佳;;基于PPP模式的城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施特許經(jīng)營期決策研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2015年06期

4 孫學(xué)工;劉國艷;杜飛輪;楊娟;;我國PPP模式發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀、問題與對策[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2015年02期

5 張曉敏;陳通;;公共文化設(shè)施PPP建設(shè)運營模式研究[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2015年01期

6 伍迪;王守清;;PPP模式在中國的研究發(fā)展與趨勢[J];工程管理學(xué)報;2014年06期

7 顧林琳;;PPP模式促進(jìn)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施事業(yè)發(fā)展的機(jī)制研究[J];金融縱橫;2014年08期

8 吳卓瑾;喬寶云;;構(gòu)建合理的PPP管理框架 推進(jìn)財政和國家治理現(xiàn)代化[J];中國財政;2014年15期

9 賈康;孫潔;;公私合作伙伴機(jī)制:新型城鎮(zhèn)化投融資的模式創(chuàng)新[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報;2014年01期

10 胡振;劉華;金維興;;PPP項目范式選擇與風(fēng)險分配的關(guān)系研究[J];土木工程學(xué)報;2011年09期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 陳少陽;PPP融資模式在基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)中的應(yīng)用研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2015年

2 楊亞楠;基于多屬性決策的PPP（Public-Private Partnerships）模式選擇研究[D];大連工業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

3 姚馳;英國PFI/PPP法律制度研究及借鑒[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2091397