發(fā)布時間：2018-05-24 01:32

  本文選題：關(guān)系嬗變 + 協(xié)調(diào)研究　； 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：城市發(fā)展本身就是人、城、市關(guān)系的建構(gòu)、解構(gòu)與重構(gòu)過程。我國新型城鎮(zhèn)化的核心是“人的城鎮(zhèn)化”,強調(diào)“以人為本”。文章嘗試將城、市兩種功能維度貫通中西方城市發(fā)展歷程,尋求城市發(fā)展中的“人本”線索,探究人、城、市三者在不同歷史階段的互動關(guān)系。通過梳理文獻資料,作者發(fā)現(xiàn)城市自形成伊始便是人類精神的外化,初始階段城市發(fā)展也是依托統(tǒng)治階層的權(quán)力與威能產(chǎn)生聚合作用。城市實體本身就是人類精神的具象化。城市的“人本”因素有其歷史淵源。然而,中西方歷史上占城市人口絕大多數(shù)的普通城市居民時常處于權(quán)利貧困與經(jīng)濟從屬性地位,缺乏真正市民權(quán)利,僅僅單純作為城市有機體成長中的貢獻要素,城、市兩重功能對普通民眾的支持甚為薄弱,人本因素被排擠到城市精神文化的邊緣。在中國改革開放后的傳統(tǒng)城鎮(zhèn)化中,作為人的因素在城市發(fā)展中墜入從屬性地位,農(nóng)民工群體“進城”、“入市”的障礙彰顯出人與城、市的關(guān)系非協(xié)調(diào)性,具體體現(xiàn)為“城”功能、“市”功能、社會功能缺乏對農(nóng)民工的有效支持。西方自從中世紀晚期伊始,資本邏輯逐漸擴大影響,統(tǒng)攝西方城市的成長模式。在城市外圍,資本逃避城市當局的監(jiān)督,無限制的蔓延,奪取鄉(xiāng)村資源；在城市內(nèi)部,資本以其強烈的腐蝕能力和增值需求為目的,極大地改造了城市的形態(tài)與發(fā)展模式。鴉片戰(zhàn)爭之后,資本深刻改造了中國的城市格局與城市性質(zhì),尤其在改革開放之后,資本邏輯在相當程度上影響了中國城市的發(fā)展機理,“物本”與“官本”壓制將“人本”擠出城市發(fā)展中的主導(dǎo)性位置。人與城、市關(guān)系失調(diào)的內(nèi)因乃在于資本邏輯對城市發(fā)展的統(tǒng)攝。基于資本邏輯的運行特征,文章提出厘清城市邊界以遏制城市無序擴張,削弱資本邏輯的擴散。在城市之中,沖破權(quán)力與資本的合謀,重新確立人本主義,通過提升制度、人居、社會保障、教育等多層次的城功能及市功能激發(fā)城市遷移群體的活力,提供發(fā)展機會、改善生活環(huán)境、提升發(fā)展能力,最終實現(xiàn)城市發(fā)展中人的主體地位。由此,以人本主義理論框架替代資本邏輯,促進城市健康發(fā)展,營造人、城、市之間的協(xié)調(diào)關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Urban development itself is the process of construction, deconstruction and reconstruction of human, city and city relations. The core of the new urbanization in our country is the urbanization of human beings, which emphasizes on people-oriented. This paper attempts to link the two functional dimensions of city and city through the course of urban development between China and the West, to seek the clue of "humanism" in urban development, and to explore the interactive relationship among people, cities and cities at different historical stages. By combing the literature, the author finds that the city is the externalization of the human spirit from the beginning of its formation, and the city development in the initial stage also depends on the power and power of the ruling class to produce the converging effect. Urban entity itself is the embodiment of human spirit. The human-oriented factor of the city has its historical origin. However, the ordinary urban residents, who constitute the vast majority of urban population in the history of China and the West, are often in the status of right poverty and economic subordination, lacking the real civil rights, and only as a contribution factor in the growth of urban organism, the city. The dual function of the city is very weak for the ordinary people, and the humanistic factor is marginalized to the edge of the city spiritual culture. In the traditional urbanization after China's reform and opening up, as a human factor, it falls into a subordinate position in the urban development. The obstacles of migrant workers "entering the city" and "entering the market" show the disharmony between the people and the city. It is embodied in the function of city, city and society. Since the beginning of the late Middle Ages, the capital logic has gradually expanded its influence and dominated the growth pattern of western cities. In the periphery of the city, the capital escapes the supervision of the city authorities, spreads without restriction, and grabs the rural resources. In the city, the capital, for the purpose of its strong corrosion ability and value added demand, has greatly reformed the form and development mode of the city. After the Opium War, capital profoundly transformed the urban pattern and urban nature of China. Especially after the reform and opening up, the logic of capital influenced the development mechanism of Chinese cities to a certain extent. The suppression of the "object-based" and "official-based" pushes the humanism out of the dominant position in the urban development. The internal cause of the imbalance between man and city is the control of capital logic to the development of city. Based on the operating characteristics of capital logic, this paper proposes to clarify the urban boundaries in order to curb urban sprawl and weaken the diffusion of capital logic. In cities, breaking through the collusion of power and capital, reestablishing humanism, stimulating the vitality of the urban migration groups and providing opportunities for development through the promotion of the system, human settlements, social security, education and other multi-level city functions, Improve the living environment, enhance the ability of development, and finally realize the status of the main body in urban development. Therefore, the theory frame of humanism replaces the capital logic, promotes the healthy development of the city, and builds the harmonious relationship among the people, the city and the city.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F290

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 常修澤;;論人本型經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)——對中國新階段結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型戰(zhàn)略的新思考[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2015年05期

2 王海娟;;人的城市化:內(nèi)涵界定、路徑選擇與制度基礎(chǔ)——基于農(nóng)民城市化過程的分析框架[J];人口與經(jīng)濟;2015年04期

3 楊菊華;;中國流動人口的社會融入研究[J];中國社會科學(xué);2015年02期

4 耿波;;城市邊界、地方城市與新型城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)中的文化城市[J];天津社會科學(xué);2014年05期

5 柳建平;孫艷飛;;新生代農(nóng)民工的收入水平與消費行為及其變動趨勢[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2014年04期

6 郭文;;“空間的生產(chǎn)”內(nèi)涵、邏輯體系及對中國新型城鎮(zhèn)化實踐的思考[J];經(jīng)濟地理;2014年06期

7 張延珍;;社會資本視角下的新生代農(nóng)民工社會融入分析[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟與科技;2014年02期

8 劉新智;劉雨松;;農(nóng)民參與新型城鎮(zhèn)化的核心問題調(diào)查[J];經(jīng)濟縱橫;2013年11期

9 齊昕;王雅莉;;城市化經(jīng)濟發(fā)展效應(yīng)的實證分析[J];城市問題;2013年09期

10 王春超;周先波;;社會資本能影響農(nóng)民工收入嗎?——基于有序響應(yīng)收入模型的估計和檢驗[J];管理世界;2013年09期

，

本文編號：1927172