京津冀地區(qū)生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值與社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)重心演變特征及耦合關(guān)系
本文選題:京津冀地區(qū) + 生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值; 參考:《林業(yè)科學(xué)》2017年06期
【摘要】:【目的】分析京津冀地區(qū)生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值與社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)重心演變特征及耦合關(guān)系,初步探究地區(qū)生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值的社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)驅(qū)動(dòng)因子,為京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展的重點(diǎn)領(lǐng)域生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)提供參考!痉椒ā窟\(yùn)用重心概念及相關(guān)公式,采用分縣區(qū)的土地利用、城鄉(xiāng)人口、三大產(chǎn)業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)計(jì)算1990—2010年京津冀地區(qū)生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值、城鄉(xiāng)人口和三大產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值重心及其偏移方向和偏移距離;構(gòu)建重心偏移的重疊性和變動(dòng)的一致性公式,研究地區(qū)生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值和社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)因子重心的動(dòng)態(tài)演化及耦合關(guān)系!窘Y(jié)果】1)1990—2010年,京津冀地區(qū)調(diào)節(jié)服務(wù)、支持服務(wù)、供給服務(wù)價(jià)值重心偏移的方向類似,文化服務(wù)價(jià)值重心偏移方向有所不同;鄉(xiāng)村人口和第一產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值重心偏移的方向類似,而城鎮(zhèn)人口、第二產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值、第三產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值重心偏移方向各具特點(diǎn)。2)20年來,調(diào)節(jié)服務(wù)價(jià)值、總生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值和三大產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值重心偏移的距離較大,而支持服務(wù)、供給服務(wù)、文化服務(wù)價(jià)值和人口重心偏移的距離相對(duì)較小。3)總服務(wù)價(jià)值重心與城鎮(zhèn)人口、第三產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值、第二產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值重心的耦合性較高,與鄉(xiāng)村人口和第一產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值重心的耦合性較低。4)以2000年為界,總服務(wù)價(jià)值重心與第二產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值、第三產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值、城鎮(zhèn)人口重心變動(dòng)的一致性有所轉(zhuǎn)變!窘Y(jié)論】地區(qū)發(fā)展不平衡造就重心偏移的復(fù)雜性,工業(yè)化進(jìn)程的異步導(dǎo)致社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)重心偏移的異步,城市化與工業(yè)化的錯(cuò)位致使生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值重心偏移錯(cuò)位;受京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展的影響,未來地區(qū)生態(tài)服務(wù)價(jià)值重心和社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)重心將進(jìn)一步偏移。
[Abstract]:[objective] to analyze the evolution characteristics and coupling relationship between ecological service value and social economic center of gravity in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, and to explore the socio-economic driving factors of ecological service value in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei areas. It provides a reference for the ecological environment protection in the key area of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei coordinated development. [methods] using the concept of center of gravity and relevant formulas, using the land use, urban and rural population, From 1990 to 2010, the value of ecological service in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the center of value added of urban and rural population and the three major industries, the migration direction and the offset distance are calculated, and the consistency formula of overlap and change of gravity shift is constructed. The dynamic evolution and coupling relationship between the ecologic service value and the center of gravity of social and economic factors were studied. [results] from 1990 to 2010, the direction of the shift of the value center of value of the Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei regions was similar to that of adjusting the service, supporting the service and providing the service value. The direction of shift of the center of gravity of cultural service value is different, the direction of shift of center of gravity of value added of rural population and primary industry is similar, while that of urban population, secondary industry value added and third industry value added center of gravity shift has its own characteristics for 20 years. The distance between adjusting service value, total ecological service value and the center of value added of three industries is larger, while the distance between supporting service, supply service, cultural service value and population center of gravity is relatively small. 3) the center of total service value and urban population. The third industry added value, the secondary industry added value center of gravity coupling is higher, and the coupling with the rural population and the first industry added value center is low .4) take the year 2000 as the boundary, the total service value center of gravity is with the second industry added value, the third industry added value, [conclusion] the imbalance of regional development leads to the complexity of the shift of gravity center, and the asynchronous process of industrialization leads to the asynchronism of the shift of gravity center of society and economy. The dislocation of urbanization and industrialization results in the dislocation of the center of value of ecological service, which will be further offset by the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and the center of value of ecological service and the center of social economy in the future.
【作者單位】: 北京林業(yè)大學(xué)水土保持學(xué)院水土保持與荒漠化教育部重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室;水利部水土保持監(jiān)測(cè)中心;
【基金】:林業(yè)公益性行業(yè)科研專項(xiàng)(201104005) “十二五”國(guó)家科技支撐計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(2011BAD38B05) 國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(41171028)
【分類號(hào)】:F127;F205
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 唐根年;許紫岳;張杰;;產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移、空間效率改進(jìn)與中國(guó)異質(zhì)性大國(guó)區(qū)間“雁陣模式”[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2015年07期
2 趙興國(guó);潘玉君;趙波;和瑞芳;劉樹芬;楊小燕;李會(huì)仙;;區(qū)域資源環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展關(guān)系的時(shí)空分析[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年06期
3 葛美玲;封志明;;中國(guó)人口分布的密度分級(jí)與重心曲線特征分析[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期
4 謝高地;甄霖;魯春霞;肖玉;陳操;;一個(gè)基于專家知識(shí)的生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)價(jià)值化方法[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期
5 馮宗憲;黃建山;;1978—2003年中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)重心與產(chǎn)業(yè)重心的動(dòng)態(tài)軌跡及其對(duì)比研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2006年02期
6 任巍;;資源環(huán)境短缺與我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];理論探討;2006年02期
7 李峰峰,周意;城市化理論二元結(jié)構(gòu)分析框架文獻(xiàn)述評(píng)[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年07期
8 徐建華,岳文澤;近20年來中國(guó)人口重心與經(jīng)濟(jì)重心的演變及其對(duì)比分析[J];地理科學(xué);2001年05期
9 包玉海,烏蘭圖雅,香寶,趙曉麗;內(nèi)蒙古耕地重心移動(dòng)及其驅(qū)動(dòng)因子分析[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;1998年04期
10 高志強(qiáng),劉紀(jì)遠(yuǎn),莊大方;我國(guó)耕地面積重心及耕地生態(tài)背景質(zhì)量的動(dòng)態(tài)變化[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 封志明;李方舟;楊艷昭;李鵬;;中國(guó)人口地理學(xué)的過去、現(xiàn)在和未來——進(jìn)展、挑戰(zhàn)與機(jī)遇(英文)[J];Journal of Geographical Sciences;2017年08期
2 苑清敏;張梟;李健;;京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展背景下合作生態(tài)補(bǔ)償量化研究[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2017年08期
3 于水瀟;趙瑞東;趙青;夏書培;郭年冬;許v,
本文編號(hào):1919889
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjifazhanlunwen/1919889.html