本文選題：產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量　切入點(diǎn)：信息披露　出處：《科技管理研究》2017年10期

【摘要】：在研究《質(zhì)量發(fā)展綱要》要求、各地質(zhì)量分析報(bào)告的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對有關(guān)專家進(jìn)行訪談的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建了以產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量水平、產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量創(chuàng)新能力、產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量工作3個(gè)維度、11個(gè)層次和30個(gè)觀測點(diǎn)構(gòu)成的產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量分析報(bào)告內(nèi)容完整性評價(jià)體系,采用層次分析法確定指標(biāo)權(quán)重。收集了近年來公開發(fā)布的有較強(qiáng)代表性的40份產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量報(bào)告,進(jìn)行賦值、評分計(jì)算,結(jié)果顯示當(dāng)前我國各地質(zhì)量報(bào)告內(nèi)容完整性整體較差,尤其在產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量創(chuàng)新能力和質(zhì)量治理信息方面披露不足,質(zhì)量信息分析方法也有待改進(jìn)。
[Abstract]:On the basis of studying the requirements of the quality Development Program, the successful experiences of the local quality analysis reports and the interviews with the relevant experts, the ability of product quality innovation was constructed based on the product quality level and the product quality innovation. The content integrity evaluation system of product quality analysis report is composed of 3 dimensions, 11 levels and 30 observation points. The index weight is determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). 40 representative product quality reports, which have been published publicly in recent years, are collected, assigned and evaluated. The results show that the integrity of the quality reports in various parts of our country is poor. Especially in product quality innovation ability and quality management information disclosure is insufficient, quality information analysis methods need to be improved.
【作者單位】： 中國計(jì)量大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：浙江省高校重大人文社科項(xiàng)目“浙江省質(zhì)量發(fā)展監(jiān)測與預(yù)警體系研究”(2013GH012) 國家自然科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)企業(yè)CSR測度理論構(gòu)建與實(shí)證研究”(71203206) 杭州市科技計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目“標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化對杭州市企業(yè)發(fā)展的貢獻(xiàn)度研究”(20130834M41) 杭州市科技局軟科學(xué)項(xiàng)目“杭州市創(chuàng)新型企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新能力指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建及其實(shí)證研究”(20130834M08)
【分類號】：F203
，

本文編號：1673397