本文選題：政府和社會(huì)資本合作　切入點(diǎn)：立體停車場　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,城鎮(zhèn)化腳步不斷加快,基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施及公共服務(wù)的需求日益加大,同時(shí),伴隨著城市化進(jìn)程的不斷加快和汽車產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策的持續(xù)實(shí)施,機(jī)動(dòng)車保有量和機(jī)動(dòng)車出行均在不斷增加,而我國城市普遍供給不足的停車設(shè)施,使得停車供需矛盾日益突出,停車難成為了繼城市交通擁堵后的又一城市交通問題。而我國政府已經(jīng)在停車設(shè)施建設(shè)上投入了大量資金,但長期來看,仍有大量資金和需求缺口,建設(shè)投資社會(huì)公共停車場,難以僅僅依靠政府包攬來解決,所以必須考慮通過政府與社會(huì)資本合作(PPP)等方式,利用社會(huì)資本進(jìn)行停車場的投資建設(shè)。本文在這一背景下,采用理論和實(shí)踐相結(jié)合、國內(nèi)外案例分析和具體項(xiàng)目研究相結(jié)合的方法,從PPP模式在西方的起源說起,明確了PPP(Public-Private-Partnership)的概念,即政府和社會(huì)資本合作模式,指政府為向社會(huì)提供有效的公共產(chǎn)品及服務(wù)、提高供給效率,通過特許經(jīng)營、購買服務(wù)、股權(quán)合作等方式,與社會(huì)資本建立的利益共享、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分擔(dān)的長期合作關(guān)系,對(duì)PPP模式的理論和經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行學(xué)習(xí)。通過分析項(xiàng)目的具體情況和區(qū)位特點(diǎn),利用物有所值評(píng)價(jià)和經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)的方式,使用定性分析、定量分析和經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)的方法,對(duì)S市立體泊車樓項(xiàng)目使用PPP模式運(yùn)作的是否物有所值和是否經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)行深入研究。根據(jù)物有所值定性評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),測算項(xiàng)目綜合得分為73.75分;根據(jù)物有所值定量評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),測算項(xiàng)目物有所值指數(shù)為92%,判定項(xiàng)目適宜采用PPP模式,且采用PPP模式比傳統(tǒng)采購模式實(shí)現(xiàn)價(jià)值較大。根據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),測算項(xiàng)目項(xiàng)目全投資內(nèi)部收益率(IRR)稅前6%,稅后5.04%,稅后項(xiàng)目投資回收期為16.94年;項(xiàng)目資本金投資額為2999.45萬元,財(cái)務(wù)內(nèi)部收益率8.29%,財(cái)務(wù)凈現(xiàn)值為2108.16萬元,判定項(xiàng)目具有明顯的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和社會(huì)效益,經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)論是可行的。進(jìn)而通過上述評(píng)價(jià),判斷項(xiàng)目的可行與經(jīng)濟(jì)、有效與高效,從多個(gè)維度來說明PPP模式的優(yōu)勢。推行PPP模式,對(duì)政府來說,不僅可以減輕政府債務(wù)負(fù)擔(dān),解決限制我國城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)的資金“瓶頸”,還能有效促進(jìn)政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變,減少對(duì)微觀事務(wù)的干預(yù),騰出更多的精力放到規(guī)劃和監(jiān)管上。對(duì)企業(yè)來講,可以降低參與公共領(lǐng)域項(xiàng)目的門檻,拓寬了私人部門發(fā)展空間,進(jìn)一步激發(fā)非公有制經(jīng)濟(jì)的活力。對(duì)社會(huì)來講,通過“讓專業(yè)的人做專業(yè)的事”,能夠提高公共產(chǎn)品供給效率,為群眾提供更多更好的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和公共服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy, the pace of urbanization continues to accelerate, the demand for infrastructure and public services is increasing day by day, at the same time, with the continuous acceleration of the urbanization process and the sustained implementation of the auto industry support policy. The number of motor vehicles and the travel of motor vehicles are increasing. However, the shortage of parking facilities in Chinese cities makes the contradiction between supply and demand of parking more and more prominent. Parking difficulty has become another urban traffic problem after urban traffic jams. However, our government has invested a lot of funds in parking facilities construction, but in the long run, there are still a lot of funds and demand gaps to build social public car parks. It is difficult to rely on the government to solve the problem, so we must consider how to use social capital to build parking lot by the way of cooperation between government and social capital. Under this background, this paper combines theory with practice. From the origin of the PPP model in the West, this paper clarifies the concept of Public-Private-Partnershipship, that is, the cooperation model of government and social capital, which refers to the government providing effective public goods and services to the society. To improve the efficiency of supply, through franchising, purchasing services, equity cooperation, and other forms of long-term cooperation with social capital to share benefits and share risks, This paper studies the theory and experience of PPP model. By analyzing the specific situation and location characteristics of the project, using the methods of value for money evaluation and economic benefit evaluation, using the methods of qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis and economic benefit evaluation, This paper makes an in-depth study on the value for money and the economy of the S city stereoscopic parking building project operating with PPP mode. According to the qualitative evaluation standard of value for money, the comprehensive score of the project is 73.75 points, and the quantitative evaluation standard of the value for money is used. The value for money index of the project is 92. It is determined that the PPP model is suitable for the project, and the PPP model is more valuable than the traditional purchasing mode. The internal rate of return on the total investment of a project is estimated to be 6 before tax, 5.04 after tax, and the payback period of investment after tax is 16.94; the capital investment of the project is 29.9945 million yuan, the internal financial return rate is 8.29 yuan, and the financial net present value is 21.0816 million yuan. Judging the project has obvious economic and social benefits, and the conclusion of economic benefit evaluation is feasible. Then, through the above evaluation, the feasibility and economy of the project are judged, and the project is effective and efficient. The advantages of PPP model can be explained from several dimensions. The implementation of PPP model can not only reduce the debt burden of government, but also solve the "bottleneck" of capital, which restricts the construction of urbanization in China, but also can effectively promote the transformation of government functions. Reduce intervention in micro-affairs and devote more attention to planning and regulation. For enterprises, they can lower the barriers to participation in public sector projects and broaden the space for private sector development. To the society, it is possible to improve the efficiency of public goods supply and provide more and better infrastructure and public services to the public by "letting the professional people do the professional work".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F283;F299.24

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹新慧;工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)淺析[J];內(nèi)蒙古統(tǒng)計(jì);2000年05期

2 王唐田;;科技經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)的直接效果法[J];科學(xué)管理研究;1985年03期

3 莊鴻湘;價(jià)值評(píng)價(jià)中包含了對(duì)使用價(jià)值的評(píng)價(jià)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;1986年06期

4 張俊文;;技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)好處多[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友;1991年01期

5 呂霞,張建琴;經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)是提高企業(yè)競爭力的有效途徑[J];理論探索;2000年04期

6 曾繁榮,韓玉啟;企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)新思維[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2003年03期

7 吳海英;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2005年13期

8 張迎軍;;關(guān)于機(jī)場社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)的探討[J];中國民用航空;2006年08期

9 常欣;;淺談醫(yī)院經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)信息;2009年02期

10 赫叢喜;薛紅艷;;投資項(xiàng)目論證中經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)的內(nèi)容與方法[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年S2期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條

1 吳文江;李剛;;企業(yè)集團(tuán)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)方法的探討[A];復(fù)雜巨系統(tǒng)理論·方法·應(yīng)用——中國系統(tǒng)工程學(xué)會(huì)第八屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];1994年

2 張巖峰;王哲明;杜曉莉;;熵權(quán)法及其在工業(yè)企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[A];Well-off Society Strategies and Systems Engineering--Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of System Engineering Society of China[C];2004年

3 洪建國;盧榮安;;基本農(nóng)田土地整理經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)——以仙桃市蓮興垸為例[A];節(jié)約集約用地 促進(jìn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展[C];2005年

4 戴金符;;DEA方法在體育用品制造業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[A];2011高等職業(yè)教育電子信息類專業(yè)學(xué)術(shù)暨教學(xué)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

5 王貴成;于在林;佟守元;劉祥;;AciNPV制劑的應(yīng)用效果及經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)[A];北京昆蟲學(xué)會(huì)成立四十周年學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];1990年

6 陸紅生;田楓林;;城市不動(dòng)產(chǎn)綜合開發(fā)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)的研究[A];中國土地使用制度改革的研究——中國土地學(xué)會(huì)1992年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];1992年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 宋玉玲;改進(jìn)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)考核指標(biāo)體系的思考[N];中國信息報(bào);2007年

2 申一潔 長治市園林局人民公園;研究城市園林綠化經(jīng)濟(jì)趨勢[N];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

3 楊建國;把握重點(diǎn) 準(zhǔn)確評(píng)價(jià)[N];中國審計(jì)報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 姚荷婷;房地產(chǎn)投資項(xiàng)目的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];安徽建筑大學(xué);2015年

2 王忠良;新余鋼鐵廠燒結(jié)余熱發(fā)電項(xiàng)目經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2015年

3 高菲;SM公司移動(dòng)醫(yī)療項(xiàng)目的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];東北石油大學(xué);2015年

4 董思奇;XY熱電廠2×350MW建設(shè)項(xiàng)目投資經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

5 魏慧慧;青島市嶗山區(qū)午山社區(qū)改造項(xiàng)目經(jīng)濟(jì)效益分析與評(píng)價(jià)[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2014年

6 王穎;德州南服務(wù)區(qū)成品油庫建設(shè)項(xiàng)目經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2014年

7 畢磊;天津臨港工業(yè)區(qū)一號(hào)碼頭項(xiàng)目經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2015年

8 彭博;長沙地鐵5號(hào)線工程項(xiàng)目經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2015年

9 武健;國電供熱改造工程項(xiàng)目經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2012年

10 劉亞偉;東營領(lǐng)秀天成商住樓項(xiàng)目經(jīng)濟(jì)效益評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1658683