本文選題：格拉斯哥　切入點(diǎn)：城市更新　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：位于蘇格蘭地區(qū)的格拉斯哥(Glasgow),依托工業(yè)革命和蓬勃的海外貿(mào)易,在19世紀(jì)初成為英國(guó)首屈一指的工業(yè)城市。但在第二次世界大戰(zhàn)之后的后工業(yè)化時(shí)期,格拉斯哥開(kāi)始由盛轉(zhuǎn)衰,各種城市問(wèn)題接踵而至。在種種挑戰(zhàn)和困難面前,自20世紀(jì)中期開(kāi)始,通過(guò)城市更新(urban renewal)、城市再生(urban regeneration)與城市復(fù)興(urban renaissance),格拉斯哥用自身的行動(dòng)回答了一個(gè)具有普遍性的問(wèn)題:工業(yè)城市在后工業(yè)時(shí)代應(yīng)當(dāng)何去何從。以住房為導(dǎo)向的城市更新從20世紀(jì)中期開(kāi)始持續(xù)到20世紀(jì)80年代末。前期,面對(duì)市中心人口無(wú)限膨脹和有限的環(huán)境承載能力之間的矛盾,格拉斯哥政府采取以住房更新為手段的方法,試圖通過(guò)建設(shè)郊區(qū)以達(dá)到分散市中心人口、降低市中心壓力的目的,然而由于周邊基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施不到位等原因未能達(dá)到目標(biāo)。后期,重點(diǎn)轉(zhuǎn)向關(guān)注內(nèi)城衰退,城市更新改變了早期由政府主導(dǎo)的模式,更加重視私人資本的參與,開(kāi)始嘗試公私合作的方式,通過(guò)一系列舉措吸引私人資本在社會(huì)各個(gè)領(lǐng)域的投資,從而達(dá)到改善城市環(huán)境、振興內(nèi)城的效果。到20世紀(jì)90年代,以文化為導(dǎo)向的城市再生政策被提上日程。格拉斯哥城市再生的文化策略從兩個(gè)方面具體展開(kāi):一是文化的硬件與軟件,集中表現(xiàn)在1990年格拉斯哥當(dāng)選歐洲文化城市。不僅新建了許多文化基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,還舉辦了多種多樣的文化活動(dòng),帶動(dòng)了旅游業(yè)的發(fā)展、提升了城市的知名度。二是文化的整體觀和歷史觀,以高博斯區(qū)的皇冠街再生計(jì)劃為代表,不僅考慮了整體的社區(qū)建設(shè),而且新建筑的選址和風(fēng)格都體現(xiàn)了對(duì)歷史的尊重。而在21世紀(jì),格拉斯哥開(kāi)啟了以創(chuàng)意為導(dǎo)向的城市復(fù)興階段,“孵化”創(chuàng)意城市的嘗試從三個(gè)方面展開(kāi)。一是開(kāi)展多樣性的城市形象活動(dòng)以提振第三產(chǎn)業(yè),二是設(shè)計(jì)公共藝術(shù)以提升城市的包容性和開(kāi)放性,三是創(chuàng)造開(kāi)放性的創(chuàng)意場(chǎng)域?yàn)槠胀ㄈ说膭?chuàng)意活動(dòng)提供空間。格拉斯哥近60年以來(lái)的城市改造實(shí)踐呈現(xiàn)出以下特征:改造的主體公有化色彩減弱、私人化特征增加;改造的客體由表及里,逐漸從冰冷的物理空間轉(zhuǎn)移到有人文氣息的文化空間和創(chuàng)意空間;改造的效果具有多面性和矛盾性。而格拉斯哥模式對(duì)當(dāng)下中國(guó)的城市改造頗具借鑒意義:主體從“單主體”向“多主體”轉(zhuǎn)變;目標(biāo)從關(guān)注物質(zhì)向關(guān)注“人”轉(zhuǎn)變;規(guī)劃從局部向整體轉(zhuǎn)變;手段從依靠住房向依托文化轉(zhuǎn)變。
[Abstract]:Glasgow, based in Scotland, became Britain's leading industrial city in the early 19th century, thanks to the industrial revolution and booming foreign trade. But in the post-industrial period after World War II, Glasgow began to grow from prosperity to decline. Urban problems followed. In the face of challenges and difficulties, beginning in the mid-20th century, Through urban renewal, urban regeneration, and urban renewal, Glasgow answers a universal question with his own actions: where industrial cities should go in the post-industrial age. City renewal continued from the middle of the 20th century to the end of the 1980s. In the face of the contradiction between the unlimited population expansion and the limited environmental carrying capacity, the Glasgow government adopted the method of housing renewal to try to disperse the population and reduce the pressure of the city center by building suburbs. However, due to the lack of infrastructure in the surrounding areas and other reasons, the focus has shifted to the inner city recession, and urban renewal has changed the early government-led model and paid more attention to the participation of private capital. Began to try out public-private partnerships, through a series of initiatives to attract private capital investment in all areas of society, so as to improve the urban environment, revitalizing the inner city. Culturally oriented urban regeneration policy has been put on the agenda. The cultural strategy of Glasgow urban regeneration is carried out from two aspects: first, the hardware and software of culture. Concentrated in the election of Glasgow as a European cultural city in 1990. Not only were many new cultural infrastructures built, but a variety of cultural activities were also organized, which led to the development of tourism. The visibility of the city has been enhanced. Second, the cultural holistic view and historical view, represented by the Crown Street Regeneration Project in Gobos, not only takes into account the overall community construction, And the location and style of the new building reflect respect for history. And in the 21st century, Glasgow has launched a stage of urban renewal based on creativity. The attempt to "incubate" creative cities has been carried out in three ways. The first is to launch a diversified urban image campaign to boost the tertiary industry. The second is to design public art to enhance the inclusiveness and openness of the city. Third, creating an open creative field to provide space for the creative activities of ordinary people. Glasgow's urban transformation practice in the past 60 years shows the following characteristics: the transformation of the main body of the public color weakened, private features increased; The transformed object is gradually transferred from the cold physical space to the humanistic cultural space and creative space. The effect of the transformation is multi-faceted and contradictory, and Glasgow model is of great significance to the urban transformation in China: the transformation of the subject from "single subject" to "multi-subject", the change of objective from paying attention to material to paying attention to "human"; Planning changes from part to whole and means from relying on housing to relying on culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.1;TU984.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋偉軒;;西方城市紳士化理論紛爭(zhēng)及啟示[J];人文地理;2013年01期

2 曲凌雁;;更新、再生與復(fù)興——英國(guó)1960年代以來(lái)城市政策方向變遷[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2011年01期

3 李明超;;英國(guó)創(chuàng)意城市興起的基礎(chǔ)與啟示[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2010年04期

4 李寶芳;;英國(guó)城市復(fù)興中的合作伙伴組織[J];城市問(wèn)題;2009年12期

5 易曉峰;;從地產(chǎn)導(dǎo)向到文化導(dǎo)向——1980年代以來(lái)的英國(guó)城市更新方法[J];城市規(guī)劃;2009年06期

6 張漢;宋林飛;;英美城市更新之國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者研究綜述[J];城市問(wèn)題;2008年02期

7 于立;張康生;;以文化為導(dǎo)向的英國(guó)城市復(fù)興策略[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2007年04期

8 董奇;戴曉玲;;英國(guó)“文化引導(dǎo)”型城市更新政策的實(shí)踐和反思[J];城市規(guī)劃;2007年04期

9 王偉年;張平宇;;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)與城市再生[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2006年02期

10 黃鶴;;文化政策主導(dǎo)下的城市更新——西方城市運(yùn)用文化資源促進(jìn)城市發(fā)展的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟示[J];國(guó)外城市規(guī)劃;2006年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王君;城市改造問(wèn)題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張U喰，

本文編號(hào)：1648847