河北省幼小銜接教育現(xiàn)狀研究
[Abstract]:The young cohesion refers to the connection between the early childhood education and the primary education. In the two different stages of the psychological development of the children in the kindergarten and the primary stage, the typical characteristics of their psychological development are of different nature. There is a clear difference between the two stages of education. Therefore, the successful completion of the child from the kindergarten to the primary school plays a very important role in the child's growth and psychological development. Professor Huck, a German educational scientist, is of the view that children face six mental faults in the early stage of engagement: the fault of the person, the fault of the way of learning, the fault of the code of conduct, the fault of the social structure, the fault of the desired level, and the fault of the learning environment. Therefore, this stage of education plays an important role in helping the child to safely and successfully span these psychological faults. At present, the research on the young cohesion is mainly divided into two research directions: one is the research orientation of the external education environment, which focuses on the development of the children, and mainly focuses on the aspects of the setting of the educational institution, the setting of the curriculum, the training of the teachers and the work of the parents, and the other, The research orientation of the children's mental development is focused on the study of the psychological behavior of the children's admission to the school. However, the existing research lacks the construction of the proper judgment standard of the effective admission, and more is to judge the present situation of the young connection from the angle of experience or sensibility, and influence the quality and the practical guidance of the research. In this study, an empirical study was used to construct a questionnaire on the status of children's psychological behavior, and it has a high validity. At the same time, through the comparison of the teaching behavior of the pre-school teachers and the difference of the expected requirements of the primary school teachers, the present situation and the problems of the young cohesive education in Hebei Province are found, and the reference for teachers to adjust their education teaching is provided. The main conclusions of this study are as follows:1. The primary school teacher's expectation of a year's new life is the academic adaptation, the lowest is the independence, and the two between the two are the general adaptation of the thinking and the behavior. The data show that, in the teaching of education, the kindergarten teachers also pay great attention to the normal training of the thinking and behavior of the children to the primary school, and pay attention to the development of the independence of the children, but the performance of the children in these two aspects is very poor after the children enter the primary school. The quality of the children's psychological behavior and the quality of the primary school teachers in the kindergarten teachers are different from that of the primary school teachers. From the content, the education content of the kindergarten should be further strengthened is the cultivation of the character and the behavior habit and the learning habit. Male teachers adapt to the students' thinking and behavior, and the expectation of academic adaptation is significantly higher than that of female teachers; in the self-independence expectation, the female teachers' expectation of primary school freshmen is higher than that of male teachers. The expectation of primary school teachers in rural primary school is higher than that of urban and urban-rural joint. The teaching behavior of the teachers in the rural kindergarten places great importance on the level of the young cohesive education, the degree of attention of the urban teachers is the lowest, and the kindergarten teachers in the combination of the urban and rural areas are in the middle of the two. The teaching behavior of the kindergarten teachers with the college degree has the highest importance to the level of the young cohesive education and the expectation of the primary school teachers to the students' admission to the psychological behavior level. The teachers with a high degree of education have a lower performance. The expected level of the primary school teachers of over 6.15 years is higher than that of the lower teaching age, and the teachers in the age of 7 to 10 years are at a lower level in all the factors. In contrast to the teaching age, the lower the title of the primary school teacher is higher than the professional title, the primary school teacher of the senior title has the lowest expectation of the psychological development level of the new school. The public kindergarten teacher is more concerned with the young cohesive education of the child in relation to the private kindergarten. In the period of 1-3 years, the teaching age of the new-in-school teachers and the school-age teachers in the age of 10-15 years is the highest in the education of the young-connected education. The kindergarten teachers of over 15 years and the kindergarten teachers of the age of 7-10 years have the lowest attention to the behavior of the young-connected education in three factors. On the basis of the arrangement of the teachers of the young connected education, the kindergarten and the primary school tend to adopt the teacher's circulation system, but the primary school also pays attention to the teaching experience and the teaching age. The most weak link of the young cohesive education is the communication and contact between the kindergarten and the primary school, and the lack of such a kind of mutual communication, and the direct result is that the young cohesive education of the two-stage school has the fault zone.11. The majority of primary schools, kindergartens, and the media have carried out young cohesion campaigns, but only about one-third of the schools continue to arrange for young cohesion. Based on the results of the above research, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to improve the effectiveness of the young cohesive education in Hebei province, in particular, the first, in the content of the young cohesive education, the kindergarten should strengthen the normal and independent culture of the children's thinking and behavior, and the second, Strengthen the interactive communication between the kindergarten and the primary school, and promote the fit of the young cohesive work of the two-stage school; and thirdly, do a good job of the young joint education management of the kindergarten and the primary school, and promote the improvement of the education effect; and fourthly, strengthen the cooperation and communication of the home school, To promote the role of the parents in the young cohesive education, the fifth, to learn from the advanced experience at home and abroad, to update the teaching mode of the kindergarten teachers and primary school teachers, and to promote the rapid and effective development of the children's psychological behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:G619.2
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周蔓雪;對幼小銜接工作有關(guān)問題的新認識[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年S1期
2 胡紅;與家長朋友談幼小銜接[J];教學(xué)與管理;2005年05期
3 李敏誼;崔淑婧;劉穎;;近十年國外不同利益相關(guān)者對于幼小銜接問題看法的研究綜述[J];外國中小學(xué)教育;2010年05期
4 樊玉蓮;樊冬梅;陳琛;;構(gòu)建幼小銜接聯(lián)動機制的實踐研究[J];上海教育科研;2010年05期
5 李敏誼;劉穎;崔淑婧;;國外近10年幼小銜接理論研究綜述[J];比較教育研究;2010年05期
6 薛輝;;在幼小雙向互動中談幼小銜接教育[J];現(xiàn)代中小學(xué)教育;2011年04期
7 裴崢嶸;;幼小銜接問題之我見[J];才智;2011年13期
8 崔新玲;梁進龍;;法國幼小銜接的經(jīng)驗及啟示[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2011年S7期
9 段偉紅;;中美幼小銜接教育之比較[J];新西部(理論版);2012年10期
10 李曉芳;趙碧玫;冉昕;張林;;六盤水幼小銜接:現(xiàn)狀與對策研究[J];六盤水師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年04期
相關(guān)會議論文 前6條
1 劉新紅;;幼小銜接工作中存在的問題及解決策略研究[A];2012年幼兒教師專業(yè)與發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2013年
2 宋懷昌;;正確處理好幼小銜接的幾個原則問題[A];中國管理科學(xué)文獻[C];2008年
3 康長運;;中國近代幼小銜接理論和實踐[A];紀(jì)念《教育史研究》創(chuàng)刊二十周年論文集(5)——中國基礎(chǔ)教育史研究(含學(xué)前教育、義務(wù)教育、高中教育、特殊教育、工讀教育等)[C];2009年
4 孫雪蓮;;拓展幼小銜接視角 促閱讀習(xí)慣養(yǎng)成[A];2014年8月現(xiàn)代教育教學(xué)探索學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2014年
5 郝海鷗;;開拓進取為教育 求實創(chuàng)新為學(xué)生[A];國家教師科研專項基金科研成果(神州教育卷2)[C];2013年
6 高文軍;;視障兒童入學(xué)前適應(yīng)性教育的研究——盲校幼小銜接問題的探討[A];中國心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會殘疾人心理衛(wèi)生分會第七屆學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2008年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 記者 張力 通訊員 李文祥;市公安局幼兒園注重“幼小銜接”[N];天津政法報;2007年
2 本報記者 蘇軍;別讓“幼小銜接”走了樣[N];文匯報;2009年
3 商報記者 李子君;暴利裹挾的幼小銜接班到底有多值?[N];北京商報;2010年
4 時言平;只有實現(xiàn)教育公平才能抑“天價幼小銜接班”[N];新華每日電訊;2011年
5 本報通訊員 李苑 駐蘇記者 何連弟;南京冒出天價“幼小銜接班”[N];文匯報;2011年
6 胡婕 本報記者 薛慶元;幼小銜接:家長應(yīng)把眼光放遠一些[N];中國消費者報;2012年
7 記者 廖君 吳植;“名校情結(jié)”催熱幼小銜接班,,有培訓(xùn)機構(gòu)打出“包過”招牌[N];新華每日電訊;2013年
8 浙江省諸暨市浣江幼教集團 應(yīng)婉林;幼小銜接不能揠苗助長[N];中國教育報;2014年
9 中國教育科學(xué)研究院基礎(chǔ)教育研究中心主任 研究員 陳如平;謹防“幼小銜接”變身“小學(xué)預(yù)科”[N];中國教育報;2014年
10 李曉玲;“幼小銜接”:廣東嘗試新版本[N];中國婦女報;2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 楊明珠;幼小銜接階段父母的教育策略[D];云南師范大學(xué);2015年
2 王燕;幼小銜接教育實踐研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2015年
3 何成霞;幼小銜接中一年級教育存在的問題和對策研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2015年
4 王長志;“K-2”學(xué)制下教學(xué)空間環(huán)境藝術(shù)設(shè)計的研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2016年
5 曹璐;幼小銜接視角下的語言教育研究[D];信陽師范學(xué)院;2016年
6 付熙媛;幼小銜接階段家庭教育現(xiàn)狀的調(diào)查研究[D];云南師范大學(xué);2016年
7 楊靜;基于兒童視角的幼小銜接研究[D];西華師范大學(xué);2016年
8 董敏;承德市雙橋區(qū)幼小銜接問題調(diào)查與策略研究[D];河北大學(xué);2015年
9 李麗;人類發(fā)展生態(tài)學(xué)視角下的幼小銜接研究[D];貴州師范大學(xué);2015年
10 羅成;遵義市幼小銜接課程的現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[D];貴州師范大學(xué);2016年
本文編號:2501224
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jichujiaoyulunwen/2501224.html