本文選題：就業(yè)能力　切入點：教育學　出處：《上海師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著高校研究生的擴招,研究生不再是社會上的“稀有品”,研究生就業(yè)形勢也隨之愈發(fā)嚴峻。其中,教育學碩士研究生由于學科、社會和自身原因在就業(yè)市場中更是處于“高不成、低不就”的尷尬處境。在影響教育學碩士研究生就業(yè)的眾多因素中,其就業(yè)能力一直是國內(nèi)外學者研究的重點。本研究通過自編的《社會主體對教育學碩士研究生就業(yè)能力認知的調(diào)查問卷》,分別針對學生、教師和用人單位三方主體進行問卷調(diào)查并進行后期的訪談。研究結(jié)果顯示:1.不同主體對教育學碩士研究生就業(yè)能力的表現(xiàn)評價有差異。整體上,三方主體對職業(yè)態(tài)度的評價最高,對求職能力的評價最低。其中,評分最高的項目集中在普通話技能、忠誠、誠實和責任心上,評分最低的項目集中在科研能力和創(chuàng)新能力上。三者之間的差異表現(xiàn)在,教師對專業(yè)能力和求職能力現(xiàn)狀的評分顯著高于學生,學生對通用能力現(xiàn)狀的自評分數(shù)顯著高于用人單位,教師和學生對職業(yè)態(tài)度現(xiàn)狀的評分顯著高于用人單位。2.不同背景的教育學碩士研究生就業(yè)能力存在差異。其中,男生和女生在不同項目上的優(yōu)勢不同;高年級學生在部分項目上的分數(shù)明顯高于低年級;工作經(jīng)歷的影響不明顯;有過學生干部經(jīng)歷的學生分數(shù)普遍高于沒有學生干部經(jīng)歷的學生。3.不同主體對就業(yè)能力重要性的評估差異不顯著。整體上,學生、用人單位和高校教師對就業(yè)能力四個維度重要性評估的順序從高到低依次是專業(yè)能力、職業(yè)態(tài)度、通用能力和求職能力,而且不同主體在對各個維度重要性排序上沒有顯著性差異。但是在就業(yè)能力的一些具體項目上,不同的主體有一定的側(cè)重,如學生更重視學習能力,而用人單位更重視團隊合作能力。本研究認為社會主體對教育學碩士研究生就業(yè)能力的認知差異是基于不同的環(huán)境和立場,因此三方主體應(yīng)該正視這種差異,并采取以下措施來促進畢業(yè)生更好地就業(yè):教育學碩士研究生應(yīng)該認真撰寫論文,提升綜合能力;加強團隊合作,培養(yǎng)集體意識;正視性別差異,發(fā)揮自身優(yōu)勢;高校應(yīng)該關(guān)注研究生就業(yè)群體,進行有針對性的職業(yè)生涯指導(dǎo);豐富課堂教學方法,引入探究合作學習方式;建立就業(yè)能力檔案,記錄學生的能力成長;用人單位應(yīng)該及時與高校進行溝通,反饋畢業(yè)生的工作表現(xiàn);正視畢業(yè)生能力不足現(xiàn)狀,提供更多實習機會和崗前培訓。
[Abstract]:With the expansion of graduate enrollment in colleges and universities, graduate students are no longer a "rare commodity" in society, and the employment situation of postgraduates is becoming more and more serious. In the job market, the social and self reasons are even more embarrassing. Among the many factors that affect the employment of postgraduates in education, The employment ability has been the focus of scholars at home and abroad. This study is aimed at the students through the questionnaire on the cognition of the social subjects to the employment ability of the postgraduates in education. Teachers and employers conducted a questionnaire survey and later interviews. The results show that different subjects have different performance evaluation on the employment ability of postgraduates in pedagogy. The evaluation of professional attitude was the highest and the evaluation of job search ability was the lowest among the three subjects. Among them, the items with the highest scores were focused on Mandarin skills, loyalty, honesty and sense of responsibility. The lowest scoring items were focused on scientific research ability and innovation ability. The difference among them was that teachers' scores on professional ability and job search ability were significantly higher than those of students. The number of students' self-rating on the status quo of general competence is significantly higher than that of employers, and the scores of teachers and students on the present situation of professional attitude are significantly higher than those of employers. 2. There are differences in the employment ability of postgraduates with different backgrounds. Boys and girls have different advantages in different projects; the scores of senior students in some projects are significantly higher than those of lower grades; the impact of work experience is not obvious; The scores of students with experience of student cadres are generally higher than that of students without experience of student cadres. 3. There is no significant difference between different subjects in evaluating the importance of employability. On the whole, students, The order of the evaluation of the importance of the four dimensions of employment ability of employers and university teachers is professional ability, professional attitude, general ability and job-seeking ability, from high to low. Moreover, there is no significant difference between different subjects in ranking the importance of each dimension. However, in some specific projects of employability, different subjects have certain emphasis, such as students pay more attention to learning ability, However, the employers pay more attention to the ability of teamwork. This study believes that the cognitive differences of social subjects to the employment ability of postgraduates in education are based on different environments and positions, so the three parties should face up to the differences. The following measures should be taken to promote the graduates to obtain a better job: the postgraduates of education should conscientiously write papers, enhance their comprehensive ability, strengthen their team cooperation, cultivate their collective consciousness, face up to gender differences, and bring their own advantages into full play. Colleges and universities should pay attention to the employment group of graduate students, carry out targeted career guidance, enrich classroom teaching methods, introduce cooperative learning methods, establish employment ability files and record students' ability growth. Employers should communicate with colleges and universities in time, feedback graduates' work performance, face up to the current situation of graduates' ability deficiency, and provide more practice opportunities and pre-job training.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G647.38;G643

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張小乾;王麗超;;普通高校畢業(yè)生就業(yè)能力現(xiàn)狀分析[J];文學教育(上);2017年01期

2 張娜;;聯(lián)合國教科文組織的核心素養(yǎng)研究及其啟示[J];教育導(dǎo)刊;2015年07期

3 李海波;彭萬秋;;“人職匹配”視域下研究生就業(yè)競爭力研究——基于對用人單位的調(diào)查信息[J];學術(shù)論壇;2015年06期

4 趙敏;;企業(yè)視角下研究生就業(yè)能力現(xiàn)狀研究[J];高等工程教育研究;2015年02期

5 牛君霞;張繼平;;臺灣地區(qū)實習教師專業(yè)能力發(fā)展的調(diào)查研究——以國立臺灣彰化師范大學為例[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學;2015年01期

6 李存嶺;李光紅;孔曉曉;;大學生就業(yè)力結(jié)構(gòu)模型的重構(gòu)與啟示[J];教育與經(jīng)濟;2014年06期

7 李曉玉;趙申苒;高昂;高冬東;;研究生就業(yè)能力的結(jié)構(gòu)與測量[J];心理研究;2014年03期

8 張倩;侯菡萏;;大學生就業(yè)力培養(yǎng)研究[J];教育探索;2014年04期

9 李萍;;培養(yǎng)體制與研究生創(chuàng)新能力的培養(yǎng)——基于貴州省的實證調(diào)查[J];研究生教育研究;2014年02期

10 開芳;;基于USEM模型的民辦本科生就業(yè)力提升措施研究[J];教育與職業(yè);2014年09期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前9條

1 崔麗男;教育學類學術(shù)型碩士研究生科研能力研究[D];哈爾濱師范大學;2016年

2 武兆強;教育學碩士研究生就業(yè)影響因素研究[D];山東師范大學;2015年

3 宋毅男;地方高等師范院校教育學碩士研究生就業(yè)問題研究[D];哈爾濱師范大學;2015年

4 張書瑜;教育學碩士畢業(yè)生就業(yè)問題研究[D];西北師范大學;2015年

5 趙璞;應(yīng)用型本科大學生就業(yè)能力與用人單位需求差異研究[D];華東師范大學;2015年

6 王璐;碩士研究生就業(yè)能力現(xiàn)狀分析與對策研究[D];江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2014年

7 梁巖;教育學碩士研究生學術(shù)能力發(fā)展過程研究[D];首都師范大學;2012年

8 劉哲;中美比較視角下教育學碩士研究生課程設(shè)置研究[D];南昌大學;2011年

9 葛晶;大學畢業(yè)生就業(yè)能力與企業(yè)需求之比較分析[D];華東師范大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1662387