本文選題：班主任評(píng)語 + 文本分析　； 參考：《上海教育科研》2015年08期

【摘要】：班主任評(píng)語是學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)的重要組成部分,對(duì)江蘇省某市兩所小學(xué)的600份班主任評(píng)語進(jìn)行文本分析后發(fā)現(xiàn):評(píng)語使用的指標(biāo)項(xiàng)目涵蓋面廣,對(duì)學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)和性格方面的評(píng)述最多;不同評(píng)語反映的信息量差別較大,但總體上更為全面;評(píng)語之間具有一定的區(qū)分度,但套話使用的情況依然存在;不同班主任評(píng)語的話語風(fēng)格多樣等。研究建議要進(jìn)一步明晰評(píng)語內(nèi)容依據(jù)、發(fā)揮評(píng)語多種功能、改進(jìn)語用策略等。
[Abstract]:Class teacher evaluation is an important part of students' comprehensive quality evaluation. The text analysis of 600 class teacher comments from two primary schools in a city of Jiangsu Province shows that the index items used in the evaluation are wide. The comments on students' learning and personality are the most; the different comments reflect different amount of information, but generally more comprehensive; there is a certain degree of differentiation between comments, but the use of stereotypes still exists. The discourse styles of different class teachers' comments are diverse and so on. The research suggests that we should further clarify the basis of the content of the comments, give full play to the various functions of the comments, and improve pragmatic strategies.
【作者單位】： 南通大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“教師的日常生活與倫理智慧養(yǎng)成研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):12YJA880172)的成果 南通大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)類博士科研啟動(dòng)基金項(xiàng)目成果
【分類號(hào)】：G625.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 何康;中學(xué)品德評(píng)語調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];上海教育科研;1994年05期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙Z，

本文編號(hào)：2069922