本文選題：校本課程 + 課程綱要��； 參考：《華東師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：校本課程開發(fā)是我國二十一世紀基礎教育課程改革的亮點,也是難點。十五年來許多中小學已在開發(fā)校本課程,并取得了一些重要經(jīng)驗。然而,學校校本課程開發(fā)的質量如何?有校本課程,就比沒有好嗎?本文著重研究校本課程方案文本質量的評估問題。校本課程綱要是指依據(jù)上級課程政策和學校校本課程的整體規(guī)劃,在充分考慮本校學生需求和已有資源的基礎上,以教師為主體開發(fā)的一門課程的設計方案。校本課程綱要以"校本性""先進性""技術性"和"一致性"為本質屬性,運用同時關照綱要本質屬性和文本結構的《校本課程綱要評估工具》收集100份全國校本課程設計大賽小學段課程綱要參賽作品的質量情況數(shù)據(jù),并以其中5份綱要文本為案例,以量的分析和質的分析方法,通過懷特圖和案例對比發(fā)現(xiàn)當前我國校本課程綱要質量的優(yōu)勢和劣勢。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):一是當前小學校本課程綱要整體質量水平中等,能做到結構完整,但課程意識較弱且存在未能清晰回應關鍵要素核心問題的情況;二是就本質屬性而言,小學校本課程綱要能體現(xiàn)出對學�，F(xiàn)實情況的回應,"校本性"特征突出,但"技術性"缺失對綱要質量影響較大,體現(xiàn)為課程設計時學生立場缺失;三是就結構而言,課程綱要缺乏良好的評價設計,編制者在強烈教學意識的影響下更關注內(nèi)容和實施的設計,而忽視對課程目標和評價的思考。針對這些問題,本文提出了針對性的改進建議。
[Abstract]:School-based curriculum development is the highlight and difficulty of the curriculum reform of basic education in twenty-first Century. In the past fifteen years, many primary and secondary schools have developed school-based curriculum and have obtained some important experiences. However, how is the quality of school based curriculum development? Is there a school-based curriculum better than not? This paper focuses on the text quality of the school-based curriculum. The school based curriculum is based on the overall planning of the higher level curriculum policy and the school based curriculum. On the basis of full consideration of the needs of the students and the existing resources, the school based curriculum is designed to develop a curriculum with teachers as the main body. The school-based curriculum is essential to "school-based" "advanced" "technical" and "consistency". The quality data of the 100 national school-based curriculum design competitions are collected by using the quality data of the 100 national school-based curriculum design competitions, and the analysis and qualitative analysis are taken with the quantitative analysis and the qualitative analysis method, through the comparison of the case and case comparison. At present, the advantages and disadvantages of the quality of our school-based curriculum outline are found. The first is that the overall quality level of the school-based curriculum of primary school is moderate, and the structure is complete, but the consciousness of the curriculum is weak and there is no clear response to the key problems of the key elements. Two is the essential attribute, the school based curriculum of primary school can be embodied. In response to the reality of the school, the characteristics of "school-based nature" are prominent, but the lack of "technical" has a great influence on the quality of the program, which is reflected in the lack of students' position in the course design; three, in terms of structure, the course outline lacks a good evaluation design, and the compiler pays more attention to the content and the design under the influence of the strong teaching consciousness, and ignores the Reflections on curriculum objectives and evaluation. Aiming at these problems, this paper puts forward some suggestions for improvement.

【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G622.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉登琿;;專業(yè)化校本課程設計方案的關鍵特征及其實現(xiàn)——以140份全國大賽獲獎作品為分析對象[J];中國教育學刊;2016年07期

2 李鋒;章敏;張斌;;基于課程標準的學程綱要開發(fā)[J];中國教育學刊;2014年02期

3 任泓澤;王海嬌;;淺析校本課程評價指標體系構建的原則[J];課程教育研究;2013年22期

4 索桂芳;;試論校本課程開發(fā)中“課程綱要”的設計[J];教育探索;2013年03期

5 葉波;范蔚;;課程改革十年:校本課程開發(fā)的進展、問題與展望[J];教育科學研究;2012年04期

6 馬玉琪;;綜合實踐活動課程與校本課程的關系探析[J];教育理論與實踐;2012年08期

7 葉波;;論校本課程開發(fā)與特色學校建設[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2011年20期

8 和學新;;校本課程開發(fā)活動的問題反思與改進[J];全球教育展望;2011年09期

9 王公章;;論校本課程開發(fā)的制度化[J];教學與管理;2011年25期

10 葉波;;校本課程開發(fā)形成特色學校何以可能[J];中國教育學刊;2011年05期

相關重要報紙文章 前5條

1 樊麗萍;;未來學校應是“學習共同體”[N];文匯報;2017年

2 姜澎;;課改這些年，，預期改革紅利釋放了多少[N];文匯報;2016年

3 鐘啟泉;;新課程改革開啟中國課程發(fā)展新紀元[N];中國社會科學報;2009年

4 和學新;;學校課程開發(fā)呼喚課程制度建設[N];中國教育報;2007年

5 趙小雅;;綜合實踐活動課并不復雜[N];中國教育報;2004年

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 胡警予;小學語文學期課程綱要評價研究[D];華東師范大學;2016年

2 戴叢宇;校本課程規(guī)劃方案質量實證研究[D];華東師范大學;2016年

3 王小平;基于一致性的小學數(shù)學教案研究[D];華東師范大學;2014年

4 林一鋼;校本課程方案評價研究[D];華東師范大學;2003年

本文編號：1825571