【摘要】：運(yùn)用秩和比綜合評(píng)價(jià)(RSR)、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)和錄像觀察等方法,對(duì)第31屆夏季奧林匹克運(yùn)動(dòng)會(huì)男子籃球比賽中12支參賽隊(duì)伍進(jìn)行指標(biāo)量化分析,并對(duì)A組(中國(guó)隊(duì)所在小組)6支球隊(duì)技術(shù)統(tǒng)計(jì)進(jìn)行分析比較。研究結(jié)果表明:在本屆比賽12支參賽球隊(duì)中,中國(guó)隊(duì)參賽隊(duì)員平均身高最高,達(dá)到203.83厘米;平均年齡最年輕,為23.42歲。在中國(guó)隊(duì)隊(duì)員出場(chǎng)時(shí)間方面,易建聯(lián)的出場(chǎng)時(shí)間達(dá)到30分鐘,在中國(guó)隊(duì)中處于支柱地位;郭艾倫和周鵬場(chǎng)均出場(chǎng)時(shí)間在25分鐘以上,在整個(gè)隊(duì)伍中具有核心作用;李根、丁彥雨航等6名球員場(chǎng)均出場(chǎng)時(shí)間在15分鐘以上,是中國(guó)隊(duì)比賽中的重要組成部分;睢冉和李慕豪場(chǎng)均出場(chǎng)時(shí)間不足10分鐘,在球隊(duì)中處于邊緣地位。進(jìn)攻RSR值方面:評(píng)級(jí)為A的是美國(guó)隊(duì);評(píng)級(jí)為B級(jí)的有澳大利亞隊(duì)等5支球隊(duì);評(píng)級(jí)為C級(jí)的有阿根廷隊(duì)等3支球隊(duì);D級(jí)的有中國(guó)隊(duì)。防守RSR方面:評(píng)為A級(jí)的有美國(guó)隊(duì);B級(jí)的有西班牙隊(duì)等3支球隊(duì);C級(jí)的包括澳大利亞隊(duì)等5支球隊(duì);中國(guó)隊(duì)評(píng)級(jí)為D級(jí)。攻防RSR方面分析,A級(jí)仍然只有美國(guó)隊(duì)一支球隊(duì);B級(jí)包括西班牙隊(duì)等4支球隊(duì);C級(jí)包括巴西隊(duì)等4支球隊(duì);中國(guó)隊(duì)評(píng)級(jí)為D級(jí)。在小組賽對(duì)手對(duì)陣進(jìn)攻數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)比分析中:總得分方面,與中國(guó)隊(duì)呈現(xiàn)非常顯著性差異有美國(guó)隊(duì)等3隊(duì)。在2分球投籃方面,在命中數(shù)方面與中國(guó)隊(duì)存在顯著差異的是美國(guó)隊(duì)和塞爾維亞隊(duì)。在3分球投籃方面,與中國(guó)隊(duì)在3分球命中方面存在非常顯著性差異美國(guó)隊(duì)和澳大利亞隊(duì);與美國(guó)隊(duì)在投籃方面存在非常顯著性差異;與中國(guó)隊(duì)在命中率方面存在顯著性差異的有美國(guó)隊(duì)和法國(guó)隊(duì)。在罰球數(shù)方面,中國(guó)隊(duì)與塞爾維亞隊(duì)和法國(guó)隊(duì)在罰球命中率方面呈現(xiàn)顯著性差異,與其他球隊(duì)不存在差異。在進(jìn)攻籃板方面,中國(guó)隊(duì)與美國(guó)隊(duì)呈現(xiàn)非常顯著性差異。在快攻得分方面,中國(guó)隊(duì)與美國(guó)隊(duì)快攻得分相差12.68分,呈現(xiàn)顯著性差異,與其他球隊(duì)不存在差異。在失誤方面,中國(guó)隊(duì)場(chǎng)均17.80次,與美國(guó)隊(duì)呈現(xiàn)非常顯著性差異,與塞爾維亞隊(duì)不存在差異。在小組賽對(duì)手對(duì)陣防守?cái)?shù)據(jù)對(duì)比分析中:在防守籃板方面,美國(guó)隊(duì)場(chǎng)均防守籃板為29.38個(gè),與中國(guó)隊(duì)呈現(xiàn)非常顯著性差異;塞爾維亞隊(duì)場(chǎng)均防守籃板為25.13個(gè),與中國(guó)隊(duì)呈非常顯著性差異;法國(guó)隊(duì)場(chǎng)均防守籃板個(gè)數(shù)為27.33個(gè),與中國(guó)隊(duì)呈非常顯著性差異;澳大利亞隊(duì)場(chǎng)均防守籃板個(gè)數(shù)為26.13個(gè),與中國(guó)隊(duì)成非常顯著性差異;委內(nèi)瑞拉隊(duì)與中國(guó)隊(duì)不存在差異。在犯規(guī)方面,中國(guó)隊(duì)場(chǎng)均犯規(guī)數(shù)最多,與法國(guó)隊(duì)呈現(xiàn)顯著性差異。中國(guó)隊(duì)與小組賽對(duì)手在搶斷、蓋帽和利用失誤得分方面不存在差異。建議:1)增加中國(guó)隊(duì)與世界強(qiáng)隊(duì)交手機(jī)會(huì)。2)優(yōu)化中國(guó)隊(duì)陣容配置。3)加強(qiáng)投籃能力,特別是3分球。4)強(qiáng)化身體對(duì)抗,增強(qiáng)比賽中體能儲(chǔ)備。5)增加跑位能力,避免“單打獨(dú)斗”。6)積極沖搶、卡位,全隊(duì)拼搶籃板。
[Abstract]:By using rank sum ratio (RSR) comprehensive evaluation of (RSR), mathematical statistics and video observation, the quantitative analysis of 12 teams in the men's basketball competition of the 31st Summer Olympic Games was carried out. The technical statistics of 6 teams in Group A (China team) are analyzed and compared. The results show that the average height of the Chinese team is the highest, reaching 203.83 cm, and the average age is 23.42 years old. In the Chinese team, Yi Jianlian's appearance time reached 30 minutes, playing in the mainstay of the Chinese team; Guo Allen and Zhou Peng each played more than 25 minutes, playing a central role in the entire team. Ding Yanyu and other six players played more than 15 minutes per game, which was an important part of the Chinese team, while Sui ran and Li Muhao played less than 10 minutes and were on the edge of the team. Offensive RSR: a rating of the United States; B rating of Australia and other five teams; C rating of Argentina and other three teams, including the Chinese team. Defense in RSR: a rating of the United States, B, Spain and other three teams, including Australia, including five teams; the Chinese team rated D. Analysis on the RSR of attack and Defense there is still only one American team in Grade A and four teams in Grade B, including Spain, and Grade C, including Brazil, and the Chinese team is rated D. In the group match attack data comparison analysis: the total score aspect and the Chinese team presents the very significant difference has the American team and so on 3 teams. In terms of 2-point shots, the United States and Serbia differ significantly from the Chinese team in the number of hits. In the aspect of 3-point shooting, there are very significant differences between USA and China in 3-point shots, and there are very significant differences between USA and USA in shooting. There is a significant difference between the Chinese team and the United States and France in the shooting rate. In terms of the number of free throws, there is a significant difference between China and Serbia and France in the percentage of free-throw hits, but there is no difference between China and other teams. In offensive rebounds, the Chinese team and the United States presented a very significant difference. In terms of fast break score, the difference between Chinese team and American team is 12.68 points, showing significant difference, and there is no difference with other teams. In terms of errors, the Chinese team averaged 17.80 games, showing a very significant difference with the United States and no difference with Serbia. In the comparison and analysis of the defensive data of the opponents in the group stage: in the defensive rebounds, the average defensive rebounds of the US team were 29.38, which was very significant difference with the Chinese team, while the Serbia team averaged 25.13 defensive rebounds per game. There were significant differences between French team and Chinese team, 27.33 between French team and Chinese team, 26.13 between Australia team and Chinese team, and there was significant difference between Australia team and Chinese team. There is no difference between Venezuela and China. In terms of fouls, China has the most fouls per game, showing significant differences with France. There is no difference between Chinese team and group-stage opponents in steals, blocks and error scores. It is suggested that: (1) increase the chance of the Chinese team playing against the strong teams in the world (.2) optimize the Chinese team's lineup allocation (.3) strengthen the shooting ability, especially the 3-point ball (.4) strengthen the physical confrontation, strengthen the physical reserve in the game, and increase the ability to move. Avoid "single fight" 6. 6) actively rush and grab, clamp, the whole team rebounds.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G841

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 左偉;;從第28屆亞錦賽看亞洲籃球格局和中國(guó)男籃現(xiàn)狀[J];西安體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

2 謝葉壽;陳鈞;;第28屆男籃亞錦賽中國(guó)隊(duì)攻防能力分析[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

3 朱焱;周殿學(xué);;2014-2015賽季中國(guó)男子籃球職業(yè)聯(lián)賽季后賽各參賽球隊(duì)攻、防能力比較研究[J];中國(guó)體育科技;2016年01期

4 關(guān)克;侯向鋒;;2014-2015賽季CBA常規(guī)賽各參賽隊(duì)攻防能力比較[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報(bào);2016年01期

5 趙晉;;2014—2015賽季中國(guó)女子籃球聯(lián)賽前4名球隊(duì)攻、防指標(biāo)的TOPSIS分析[J];中國(guó)體育科技;2015年05期

6 侯向鋒;趙晉;景小儼;;2014籃球世界杯前8名球隊(duì)的攻防能力分析[J];中國(guó)體育科技;2015年03期

7 耿建華;王建剛;;2013-2014賽季CBA聯(lián)賽各參賽球隊(duì)攻防競(jìng)技實(shí)力的比較研究[J];中國(guó)體育科技;2015年01期

8 侯向鋒;光暉;李鑫;;第27屆亞洲男子籃球錦標(biāo)賽中國(guó)隊(duì)與對(duì)手攻防實(shí)力比較[J];上海體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

9 顏海波;唐峭峻;;從第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)探究中國(guó)男籃現(xiàn)狀與差距[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

10 顏永濤;;第26屆亞錦賽中國(guó)男籃與對(duì)手攻防能力比較研究[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 程宏森;第27屆男籃亞錦賽中國(guó)隊(duì)失利原因分析[D];北京體育大學(xué);2015年

2 胡建會(huì);第27屆亞錦賽中國(guó)男籃攻防能力的分析研究[D];西安體育學(xué)院;2014年

3 朱鑫;第27屆男籃亞錦賽中國(guó)隊(duì)及對(duì)手攻防技術(shù)統(tǒng)計(jì)比較研究[D];西安體育學(xué)院;2014年

4 魏斌;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃防守技戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用研究[D];成都體育學(xué)院;2013年

5 裴原浩;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃攻防能力的分析與研究[D];成都體育學(xué)院;2013年

6 喬明波;第16屆男籃世錦賽中國(guó)隊(duì)與前八強(qiáng)統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)比較研究[D];成都體育學(xué)院;2012年

7 張彥;對(duì)第26屆男籃亞錦賽中、外內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的比較分析[D];山西大學(xué);2012年

8 王松;第26屆籃球亞錦賽中外男籃組織后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員攻防能力的比較研究[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

9 張輝;第26屆男籃亞錦賽中國(guó)隊(duì)運(yùn)用防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)狀況分析[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

10 閆晉;對(duì)第16屆世錦賽中國(guó)男籃主要競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手進(jìn)攻主要技戰(zhàn)術(shù)特點(diǎn)的研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2236579