【摘要】：國家體育總局職業(yè)技能鑒定指導(dǎo)中心于2013年修訂了《游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員考核細則》,新版考核細則在教學(xué)指導(dǎo)能力考核方式上把2006版10分鐘說課改為更加直觀的10分鐘模擬教學(xué)�？己四Ｊ降母淖�、模擬教學(xué)課的特殊性、考核標準的滯后性等加大了考評員對考生教學(xué)指導(dǎo)能力觀察和評判的難度,進而影響了考評員的評價方式和評價的客觀性、準確性。本文采用文獻資料、問卷調(diào)查、錄像分析、實地調(diào)查等方法對“我國游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員教學(xué)能力考核標準體系實施現(xiàn)狀”和“廣東省游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員教學(xué)指導(dǎo)能力考評現(xiàn)狀”進行調(diào)查分析,從而為廣東省職業(yè)技能鑒定站的管理者提供決策依據(jù),使游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員考評工作更加科學(xué)、合理,為游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員職業(yè)健康發(fā)展提供保障。研究結(jié)果如下:1、為了解游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員能力現(xiàn)狀設(shè)計問卷,統(tǒng)計結(jié)果顯示63%的人認為當(dāng)前指導(dǎo)員教學(xué)能力有待提高;認為指導(dǎo)員基本技術(shù)偏低的占34%;認為應(yīng)提高其他能力的僅占3%。2、抽樣收錄2015年教學(xué)指導(dǎo)能力考核評分表,數(shù)據(jù)處理后顯示13項考核指標中考評員在⑵、⑶、⑸、⑹、⑺、⒀這幾項指標(指標序列號見附錄D)存在較大評分誤差。3、問卷統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)顯示,考評員們普遍認為影響教學(xué)指導(dǎo)能力評分誤差的因素主要包括考核標準、10分鐘課特殊性、考評員標準理解偏差、業(yè)務(wù)能力、考評員監(jiān)督管理機制等。其中,選擇考核標準的占91%;認為10分鐘課特殊性對評分影響較大的占81%;認為對考評員缺乏監(jiān)督管理機制的占30%。4、研究發(fā)現(xiàn),當(dāng)前游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員考評體系整體較為完備,但仍存在反饋機制缺失、對考評員缺乏監(jiān)督管理機制等缺陷。訪談有關(guān)專家和考評員,普遍認為國家體育總局職鑒中心應(yīng)當(dāng)完善現(xiàn)行監(jiān)督管理機制;同時,給予各地區(qū)職鑒站更大權(quán)利、職鑒站根據(jù)考評員日常表現(xiàn)給予安排工作等措施加強管理。此外,在考評工作流程中加設(shè)定期培訓(xùn)會議、考評后小結(jié)會、考后信息反饋等以保障考評工作順利完成。
[Abstract]:In 2013, the Vocational skill Appraisal guidance Center of the State Sports Administration revised the rules for the Assessment of Swimming Social Sports instructors, and the new version of the rules changed the 2006 edition of the 10-minute course into a more intuitive one. 10 minutes simulation teaching. The change of the examination mode, the particularity of the simulated teaching course, the lag of the assessment standard and so on have increased the difficulty for the examinee to observe and judge the examinee's teaching instruction ability, thus has affected the examiner's evaluation way and the appraisal objectivity, the accuracy. This paper uses literature, questionnaire, video analysis, Field investigation and other methods are carried out to investigate and analyze the implementation of the standard system of teaching ability assessment of swimming social sports instructors in China and the present situation of evaluation of teaching guidance ability of swimming social sports instructors in Guangdong Province. It can provide decision basis for the managers of Guangdong vocational skill appraisal station, make the evaluation work of swimming social sports instructors more scientific and reasonable, and provide guarantee for the healthy development of swimming social sports instructors. The results are as follows: 1. The questionnaire is designed to understand the current situation of swimming social sports instructor ability. The statistical results show that 63% of the people think that the current instructor teaching ability needs to be improved; 34 of them considered that the basic skills of instructors were on the low side, and only 30.2 thought that other abilities should be improved. The scale of assessment of teaching instruction ability in 2015 was sampled and the data processing showed that the examiners were 6 / 7 of the 13 assessment indexes. 13 these indicators (see Appendix D for the serial number of indicators) have a large score error of .3.The statistical data of the questionnaire show that the factors that affect the scoring error of teaching guidance ability mainly include the particularity of the 10-minute course. The examiner standard understanding deviation, the business ability, the examiner supervises the management mechanism and so on. Among them, 91% selected the assessment standard; 81% thought that the particularity of 10-minute class had a great impact on the score; 30.4% thought that the examiner lacked supervision and management mechanism. The study found that the current swimming social sports instructor evaluation system was relatively complete. However, there are still some defects such as the lack of feedback mechanism and the lack of supervision and management mechanism for examiners. Interviewing relevant experts and examiners, it is generally agreed that the Vocational Inspection Center of the State Sports Administration should improve the current supervision and management mechanism, and at the same time, give more rights to the regional vocational training stations. According to the daily performance of the examiners, job evaluation station to arrange work and other measures to strengthen management. In addition, regular training meeting, summary meeting and information feedback are set up to ensure the successful completion of the evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣州體育學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G861.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何壯;趙守盈;;技能評分項目裁判員評分結(jié)果的多面Rasch模型分析——項目反應(yīng)理論在體育運動領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年03期

2 李萍;;大學(xué)生健美操比賽裁判員評分客觀性分析——以重慶市第5屆大學(xué)生健美操比賽為例[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年04期

3 劉建立;;體育競賽中主觀評分的概念、內(nèi)涵及其評判特征研究[J];體育與科學(xué);2008年03期

4 李楊;;體育教師教學(xué)能力研究[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2008年05期

5 蔡傳明;;體育教師教學(xué)能力發(fā)展的階段性特征[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學(xué)院學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2007年12期

6 鄭希;梁海金;;利用微格教學(xué)培養(yǎng)游泳教師教學(xué)能力的探討[J];科技資訊;2007年33期

7 陳柏堅;影響競技體操裁判公正執(zhí)法因素的研究[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年04期

8 李相如,劉國永;關(guān)于我國兩種社會體育指導(dǎo)員制度的比較研究——兼論構(gòu)建中國社會體育指導(dǎo)員制度體系的設(shè)想[J];體育科學(xué);2005年03期

9 韓會君,沈建華;廣東省社會體育指導(dǎo)員培訓(xùn)的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展對策研究[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期

10 何江川;主觀評分中裁判員水平評價方法的研究——體育主觀評分裁判評價模型研究[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 李臣功;北京體育大學(xué)體育教育專業(yè)學(xué)生教學(xué)能力評價指標體系的研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2012年

2 黃珊珊;體育舞蹈裁判員臨場執(zhí)裁不端行為的原因分析及預(yù)防對策[D];湖北大學(xué);2011年

3 富酉;北京市城區(qū)游泳社會體育指導(dǎo)員能力結(jié)構(gòu)及構(gòu)成指標的分析研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2009年

4 張榮存;評分類體育項目裁判員臨場執(zhí)法水平評價的研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2007年

5 黃衍存;國際男子體操評分規(guī)則演變的特征及影響因素研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號：2194949