本文選題：奧運會 + 游泳��； 參考：《中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：主要采用文獻資料法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計法、聚類分析法、對比分析法、邏輯分析法等研究方法分別從獎牌設(shè)置情況、獎牌總體歸屬情況、各項群亞類獎牌歸屬情況、各項群亞類獎牌歸屬的聚類情況、各項群亞類獎牌歸屬的動態(tài)演變等方面,對第27~31屆奧運會游泳獎牌歸屬的動態(tài)演變情況進行全面細(xì)致的研究,研究得出以下結(jié)論:1、奧運會游泳項目,美國表現(xiàn)出來絕對的霸主實力,在總的獎牌數(shù)和金牌總數(shù)上遙遙領(lǐng)先其他各國,獨自成為第一梯隊,中國、澳大利亞、荷蘭、日本形成第二梯隊緊隨美國,雖然中國以金牌數(shù)的優(yōu)勢排在第二梯隊,但相對第二梯隊的其他國家獎牌的總數(shù)較少。2、各項群亞類獎牌的強勢區(qū)中都有美國的身影,說明游泳項目上美國不僅在整體上強而且在各分項和男、女項目上發(fā)展的都很均衡。作為第二梯隊的澳大利亞基本上處在獎牌的優(yōu)勢區(qū)中,荷蘭、日本僅在個別項目中處在獎牌的優(yōu)勢區(qū)中,而中國基本上處在獎牌的弱勢區(qū)域中,呈現(xiàn)“陰盛陽衰”發(fā)展不均衡的現(xiàn)狀。3、男子短距離游泳方面,作為強勢區(qū)和優(yōu)勢區(qū)的國家,只有美國保持上升的態(tài)勢,澳大利亞呈下滑趨勢逐漸推出競爭,荷蘭和南非的不穩(wěn)定狀態(tài),中國在此類項目還沒有獎牌收獲,與其他國家的競技水平相差很大。女子短距離游泳方面,美國還是以絕對的優(yōu)勢保持領(lǐng)跑,而澳大利亞已經(jīng)退出了該類項目獎牌的爭奪,中國在此類項目上處在獎牌的弱勢區(qū)有很大機會去沖擊獎牌的爭奪。4、男子短距離游泳接力方面,除了美國以絕對的優(yōu)勢保持平穩(wěn)的狀態(tài)以外,澳大利亞雖然起伏較大,但也是主要競爭國家之一,處在獎牌弱勢區(qū)的日本在4×100米混合泳上也表現(xiàn)不錯的成績,中國在此類項目上與其他國家實力相差較大。女子短距離游泳接力方面,美國和澳大利亞以絕對的實力占據(jù)著前兩名,中國在此類項目上僅有一枚獎牌收獲,相對男子情況要好很多,與接力強國實力相差不是很遠。5、男子中距離游泳方面,美國以絕對的優(yōu)勢領(lǐng)先其他各國,日本的上升趨勢與澳大利亞的下降趨勢,與短距離游泳相比,中國在此類項目上存在著和其他強國的抗衡的實力。女子中距離游泳方面,美國和澳大利亞的波動很大,此類向項目的競爭格局也要相對動蕩,中國在這些項目上并表現(xiàn)出了不俗的成績,在獎牌的爭奪上也能分一杯羹。
[Abstract]:The main research methods are literature, mathematical statistics, cluster analysis, comparative analysis, logic analysis and so on. This paper makes a comprehensive and detailed study on the dynamic evolution of swimming medal attribution in the 2731st Olympic Games from the aspects of the cluster situation of medal attribution in each cluster subcategory, the dynamic evolution of medal attribution in each cluster subcategory, and the dynamic evolution of medal attribution in each cluster subcategory. The study draws the following conclusion: 1. Swimming in the Olympic Games, the United States shows absolute dominance. It is far ahead of other countries in the total number of medals and the total number of gold medals, becoming the first echelon alone, China, Australia, the Netherlands, Japan formed the second echelon, followed by the United States. Although China ranked second in gold medals, the total number of medals in other countries in the second echelon was smaller than that in the second echelon. The United States was present in the strong areas of each sub-category of medals. It shows that swimming events in the United States not only in the overall strong and in all sub-items and women and men's events are very balanced development. Australia, as the second echelon, is basically in the dominant zone of the medal, the Netherlands and Japan are in the dominant zone of the medal only in individual events, while China is basically in the weak zone of the medal. In short distance swimming for men, as a strong and dominant region, only the United States has maintained an upward trend, while Australia has a downward trend to gradually introduce competition. The Netherlands and South Africa are unstable, and China has yet to win medals in such events, which is far from the level of competition elsewhere. In women's short distance swimming, the United States still leads the race by an absolute margin, while Australia has withdrawn from the competition for medals in this category of events. China has a great chance of competing for medals in the weaker areas of medals in such events. In the men's short distance swimming relay, in addition to the United States, which maintains a stable state by absolute superiority, Australia has a big ups and downs. But one of the main contenders, Japan, which is in a weak medal zone, has also done well in the 4 脳 100 meter medley, with China lagging far behind other countries in such events. In the women's short distance swimming relay, the United States and Australia occupy the top two in absolute strength. China has only one medal in this category, much better than the men. The strength of the relay power is not far from that of the relay power. 5. In terms of men's middle distance swimming, the United States leads other countries by absolute superiority. Japan's upward trend is similar to that of Australia's downward trend, and compared with short distance swimming. China has the power to compete with other powers in such projects. In women's mid-range swimming, the United States and Australia have fluctuated, and the competitive landscape for these events has been relatively volatile. China has performed well in these events and won a share of the medal race.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G861.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 本刊編輯部;洪鴻;易靖茗;章漣漪;昌校宇;鄭宏博;;第31屆夏季奧林匹克運動會[J];臺聲;2016年16期

2 孫昌軍;高紅為;李發(fā)偉;;我國歷屆奧運會金牌項目“Pareto”分析[J];體育科技;2016年01期

3 扈詩興;;倫敦奧運會世界泳壇競爭格局變化特征分析[J];吉林體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年04期

4 丁潔;史慶忠;;奧林匹克精神在高校德育中的作用[J];品牌(下半月);2015年05期

5 程立秀;;從近年重大賽事成績看我國游泳的發(fā)展特征[J];游泳;2015年03期

6 劉巖;;從第30屆奧運會看當(dāng)今世界泳壇競爭格局[J];體育研究與教育;2014年05期

7 魏梅;崔玉玲;張波;;里約熱內(nèi)盧奧運會中國游泳隊備戰(zhàn)策略分析[J];體育文化導(dǎo)刊;2014年03期

8 孫通;;倫敦奧運世界游泳競爭格局的變化趨勢及特征[J];體育科學(xué)研究;2013年03期

9 劉燦模;;倫敦奧運會中國游泳競技成績分析[J];體育文化導(dǎo)刊;2013年01期

10 康娜娜;張玉超;張文慧;;第30屆奧運會世界泳壇競爭格局及我國競技實力分析[J];浙江體育科學(xué);2013年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前4條

1 滿曉霞;鐘煉;;倫敦奧運周期世界泳壇格局深度解析[A];第九屆全國體育科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編(2)[C];2011年

2 嚴(yán)立;嚴(yán)專;;2004-2008奧運會我國游泳項目突破點的研究[A];第七屆全國體育科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編（二）[C];2004年

3 李軍;曹廣海;;奧運會游泳項目成績發(fā)展趨勢及灰色預(yù)測研究[A];第八屆全國體育科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編（二）[C];2007年

4 邵山;董斌;;對26-28屆奧運會體能主導(dǎo)類運動項目金牌分布特征的研究[A];第十九屆全國高校田徑科研論文報告會論文專輯[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉雅希;從世界游泳大賽獎牌分布探析游泳項目之格局[D];武漢體育學(xué)院;2014年

，

本文編號：1945426