2016年里約奧運會中國男籃與對手攻防能力的TOPSIS分析
本文選題:里約奧運會 + 籃球 ; 參考:《東北師范大學》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:在2016年剛剛結束的里約奧運會上,中國隊在與同小組的美國隊、澳大利亞隊、法國隊、委內(nèi)瑞拉隊和塞爾維亞隊5支隊伍的比賽中,以5戰(zhàn)全負結束了里約奧運的籃球征程。在媒體惋惜、國人質(zhì)疑、社會輿論層出不盡的壓力下,唯有總結經(jīng)驗,尋找差距,重振旗鼓才可振興競技籃球的發(fā)展;诖,本文以里約奧運會中國男籃與對手的技術統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)為依據(jù),對中國隊與對手的攻防能力指標進行統(tǒng)計與分析,探討中國隊與對手攻防能力的差異的現(xiàn)狀與原因,旨在為中國籃球競技實力的提升提供數(shù)據(jù)支撐。本研究中擬采用文獻資料法、專家訪談法、錄像觀察法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計法、TOPSIS分析法、邏輯分析法等對2016年里約奧運會中國隊與對手攻防能力指標進行統(tǒng)計與分析,并對中國隊與對手的進攻、防守和攻防實力進行定量分析。研究認為:(1)在里約奧運會的籃球比賽中,中國隊與對手在得分(場均得分、2分球得分、三分球得分)、進攻籃板、助攻方面與對手存在非常顯著性的差異(p0.01),但在罰籃得分和失誤方面與對手不存在顯著性差異(p0.05)。美國隊、澳大利亞隊和法國隊的進攻Ci值分別達到了0.5以上,屬于進攻能力較強的隊伍,而委內(nèi)瑞拉、塞爾維亞和中國隊的進攻Ci值都在0.5以下,進攻能力相對較為弱一些。(2)在防守指標方面,中國隊與對手在失分和防守籃板方面存在非常顯著性的差異(p0.01);但在搶斷、蓋帽和犯規(guī)方面與對手不存在顯著性差異(p0.05)。美國隊、澳大利亞隊、法國隊、委內(nèi)瑞拉、塞爾維亞和中國隊的防守Ci值都達到了0.5以上,均屬于防守能力較強的隊伍。(3)在攻防綜合效果方面,美國隊、澳大利亞隊和法國隊的攻防Ci值分別達到了0.92834、0.82103和0.57192,屬于競技實力較強的隊伍,尤其是美國隊和澳大利亞隊的Ci值超過了0.8,在小組球隊中當屬于一流強隊。而委內(nèi)瑞拉、塞爾維亞和中國隊的攻防Ci值分別為0.34921、0.32283和0.21728,Ci值均在0.5以下,攻防能力相對較弱。建議:在中國男籃的未來訓練中,應加強對運動員2分球和3分球的投籃能力,具體策略為,在2分球訓練過程中,應加強高強度對抗性干擾條件下的投籃能力,提高2分球的命中率。在3分球訓練過程中,可通過內(nèi)外策略、外圍掩護、突破分球、外圍球轉移等方式,且在團隊配合和基礎配合的基礎上進行強化練習。在比賽過程中,應加強對籃板球的拼搶能力,無論在進攻籃板還是防守籃板球的拼搶過程中,中國隊存在“等”、“看”、“撿”的意識,應改變這種錯誤的意識,加強拼搶籃板球的意識,提高對籃板球反彈方向的預判,提前搶占拼搶籃板球的有利位置,實現(xiàn)團隊配合拼搶籃板球的意識。加強體能訓練,提升運動員的身體素質(zhì),增強比賽過程中運動員的身體對抗能力,尤其是在處于對手貼身緊逼和人盯人防守中,能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)高強度防守壓力下保證技術實施所需要的體能,具體訓練策略可通過高強度、大負荷的專項身體體能訓練來增強運動員的技術運用能力。重視青年運動員的培養(yǎng),加強隊伍的梯隊建設,增加年輕運動員的大賽經(jīng)驗,避免由于新老交替而導致的年青運動員“怯場”現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:At the Rio Olympic Games just ended in 2016, the Chinese team ended the Rio Olympic Games with the 5 teams of the United States, Australia, France, Venezuela and Serbia. In the media, the Chinese people questioned that, under the pressure of public opinion, only the experience was summed up. Based on the statistical data of the Chinese men's basketball team and their opponents, this paper, based on the technical statistics of the Chinese men's basketball and rivals in the Rio Olympic Games, makes a statistics and Analysis on the attack and defense capability indexes of the Chinese team and their opponents, and probes into the present situation and reasons for the difference between the attack and defense ability of the Chinese team and their opponents, and the aim is to compete for Chinese basketball. The improvement of technical strength provides data support. In this study, we should use the method of literature, expert interview, video observation, mathematical statistics, TOPSIS analysis, logic analysis and so on to make statistics and Analysis on the attack and defense capability indexes of the Chinese team and opponents in the Rio Olympic Games in 2016, and the attack, defense and attack and defense strength of the Chinese team and their opponents. The study holds that: (1) in the basketball games of the Rio Olympic Games, there is a significant difference between the Chinese team and the opponent in the score (field average score, 2 score score, three score score), offensive rebounds and assists (P0.01), but there is no significant difference from the opponent in the penalty basket score and error (P0.05). The United States team, The offensive Ci value of the Australian team and the French team reached 0.5 and above, which belonged to the strong offensive team, while Venezuela, Serbia and China were both under 0.5 and the offensive ability was relatively weak. (2) in defense indicators, the Chinese team and their opponents were very significant in losing points and defending rebounds. Differences (P0.01); but there is no significant difference from the opponents (P0.05). The defensive Ci of the United States, Australia, France, Venezuela, Serbia and China all reached more than 0.5. (3) the United States, Australia and the defense team. The French team's attack and defense Ci value reached 0.92834,0.82103 and 0.57192 respectively, belonging to a strong competitive team, especially the United States and Australia's Ci value exceeding 0.8, in the team team as the first class strong team. While Venezuela, Serbia and China's attack and defense Ci were 0.34921,0.32283 and 0.21728 respectively, Ci values were all 0.5 Below, the ability of attack and defense is relatively weak. It is suggested that in the future training of Chinese men's basketball, the shooting ability of 2 and 3 points should be strengthened. The specific strategy is that during the training of 2 points, the ability to shoot under the condition of high intensity and antagonism should be strengthened and the hit rate of 2 points should be improved. In the training process of 3 points, the internal and external strategies can be adopted. In the course of the game, we should strengthen the ability to snatching the rebounds. In the process of playing the offensive rebounds or the defensive rebounds, the Chinese team should change the consciousness of "wait", "see" and "pick". This kind of wrong consciousness, strengthening the consciousness of rebounding, improving the pre judgment of rebounding direction, preempting the favorable position of rebounding in advance, realizing the sense of teamwork and rebounding, strengthening physical training, improving the physical quality of the athletes, and enhancing the physical antagonism of the athletes during the competition, especially in the course of the competition. The opponent's close to body press and man to man defense can realize the physical ability to ensure the technical implementation under the high strength defense pressure. The specific training strategy can enhance the skill use ability of the athletes through high intensity and heavy load special physical fitness training. The athletes' experience of competition can avoid the "fright" phenomenon of young athletes due to the alternation of new and old.
【學位授予單位】:東北師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:G841
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 肖坤鵬;;青少年校外體育輔導現(xiàn)象解讀[J];體育文化導刊;2016年08期
2 肖坤鵬;孫建華;張鐵民;;發(fā)球方式對排球運動員視覺搜索特征影響的研究[J];天津體育學院學報;2016年04期
3 劉曉華;付浩;;第28屆亞洲男子籃球錦標賽中國隊進攻失誤的原因分析[J];中國學校體育(高等教育);2016年04期
4 謝葉壽;陳鈞;;第28屆男籃亞錦賽中國隊攻防能力分析[J];北京體育大學學報;2016年03期
5 肖坤鵬;;運動信息模式結構的時間和空間特征——基于排球發(fā)球落點判斷的研究[J];吉林體育學院學報;2015年04期
6 章翔;;NBA與CBA球隊技術統(tǒng)計的逐步回歸分析及比較研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2014年01期
7 李國;馬德森;孫慶祝;;第30屆奧運會女子籃球項目參賽球隊技術統(tǒng)計的RSR分析[J];中國體育科技;2013年03期
8 陳新鍵;;倫敦奧運會中國男子籃球隊技術統(tǒng)計結果分析[J];廣州體育學院學報;2013年01期
9 李國;孫慶祝;;第30屆奧運會中國男子籃球隊與對手攻防指標的TOPSIS分析[J];中國體育科技;2013年01期
10 肖坤鵬;孫建華;;排球運動員接發(fā)球過程中視覺搜索特征的研究[J];體育科學;2012年09期
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 孫寶聰;中國男籃與世界強隊攻守能力的比較分析及對策研究[D];山東師范大學;2005年
2 鄭立勛;第二十七屆奧運會男子籃球比賽八強及中國隊防守戰(zhàn)術的比較研究[D];北京體育大學;2003年
,本文編號:1782700
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1782700.html