發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-13 00:17

  本文選題：湯姆斯杯 + 技戰(zhàn)術(shù)分析�。� 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：湯姆斯杯羽毛球賽是世界上最高水平的男子羽毛球團(tuán)體賽,這種賽事運(yùn)動(dòng)員表現(xiàn)出的技戰(zhàn)術(shù),引領(lǐng)世界羽毛球運(yùn)動(dòng)的發(fā)展方向與潮流。對(duì)比賽的研究,可以能總結(jié)出運(yùn)動(dòng)員的技術(shù)風(fēng)格、戰(zhàn)術(shù)體系、指導(dǎo)思想。在過去10年中國羽毛球隊(duì)在湯姆斯杯都是第一,而在2014年本決賽中輸給了日本隊(duì)。本文將對(duì)中國隊(duì)羽毛球運(yùn)動(dòng)員在2014年湯姆斯杯的半決賽中技戰(zhàn)術(shù)進(jìn)行分析,分析運(yùn)動(dòng)員的技戰(zhàn)術(shù)的優(yōu)勢與不足,便于教練員、運(yùn)動(dòng)員能更好的把握羽毛球制勝規(guī)律,為以后的訓(xùn)練提供一定的幫助。為提高我國羽毛球運(yùn)動(dòng)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)水平提高理論依據(jù)。本文采用了文獻(xiàn)綜述法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)法、錄像觀察法和對(duì)比分析法,通過觀察湯姆斯杯半決賽的比賽錄像,通過錄像統(tǒng)計(jì)出相關(guān)羽毛球技戰(zhàn)術(shù)數(shù)據(jù),并依據(jù)大量文獻(xiàn)所整理出的分析方法對(duì)中日雙方的比賽數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,得出技戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用上的差異,進(jìn)行總結(jié)得出以下結(jié)論:1男子單打的比賽中,對(duì)于發(fā)球區(qū)域的選擇,中國隊(duì)和日本隊(duì)都以1號(hào)區(qū)域和5號(hào)區(qū)域?yàn)橹�。接發(fā)球的選擇,中國隊(duì)和日本隊(duì)都以網(wǎng)前的搓放和勾對(duì)角為主。2男單比賽中,前場技術(shù)的運(yùn)用,比賽雙方的主要選擇是搓放,次數(shù)明顯多于其他技術(shù)。而搓放、勾對(duì)角以及撲球都是運(yùn)動(dòng)員所采取的主要方式。中場技術(shù)的使用上,擋球是使用得最多的。而后場方面,不管是諶龍還是杜鵬宇,殺球次數(shù)都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)少于日本選手,而高遠(yuǎn)球則遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)多于對(duì)方,可見其進(jìn)攻不如日本選手。3男單比賽中,諶龍主動(dòng)得分和田兒賢一相差不多,但是在失分方面卻遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于對(duì)方,可以看出,諶龍比賽中失誤多于對(duì)方。而杜鵬宇的主動(dòng)得分與失分都和桃田賢斗相近,沒有太大差別。4男子雙打比賽中,雙方隊(duì)員對(duì)于發(fā)球落點(diǎn)的選擇同樣是以1、5號(hào)區(qū)域?yàn)橹?而接發(fā)球方面,雙方都以推球和放網(wǎng)為主,其他技術(shù)的使用較少。而第三拍技術(shù)上,擋球和推球成為主要選擇,雙方這兩項(xiàng)技術(shù)的使用都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)多于其他技術(shù)。5男子雙打的比賽中,得失分的情況,中國隊(duì)的主動(dòng)得分比日本隊(duì)要多,失分方面,也比對(duì)方要多。而戰(zhàn)術(shù)方面,雙方都采取的是前封后攻戰(zhàn)術(shù),而攻中路的技術(shù)漸漸失去主體地位。
[Abstract]:Thomas Cup Badminton tournament is the world's highest level of men's badminton team competition, this kind of event athletes show skills and tactics, leading the development direction and trend of the world badminton.The research on the competition can sum up the technical style, tactical system and guiding ideology of the athletes.The Chinese badminton team has been number one in the Thomas Cup for the past 10 years, but lost to Japan in the 2014 final.This paper will analyze the techniques and tactics of the Chinese badminton players in the 2014 Tombs Cup semi-final, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the players' techniques and tactics, so as to facilitate the coaches and athletes to better grasp the winning rules of badminton.To provide some help for future training.In order to improve the level of badminton techniques and tactics in China to improve the theoretical basis.This paper adopts literature review method, mathematical statistics method, video observation method and comparative analysis method, through observing the game video of the Thomas Cup semi-final, through the video statistics related badminton techniques and tactics data.And according to the analysis method collated by a large number of documents, this paper analyzes the match data between China and Japan, obtains the differences in the application of techniques and tactics, and concludes the following conclusions: the choice of serve area in the male singles game of 1: 1.The Chinese team and the Japanese team are mainly in region 1 and 5.The choice of receiving and serving, the Chinese team and the Japanese team are in front of net rub and hook diagonal mainly in the men's singles competition, the use of front-court technology, the main choice of both sides of the game is rubbing, the number of times is obviously more than other techniques.Rubbing, ticking, and bowling are the main ways players take.The use of midfield techniques, blocking is the most used.In the backcourt, whether Chen long or du Pengyu, the number of times they kill the ball is far less than that of the Japanese player, and the high distance ball is far more than the other side. It can be seen that Chen long's active score is not much different from that of Kenichi Tanaka in the men's singles competition of Japanese player .3.But in the loss of points is far higher than the other side, you can see, Chen long in the match more mistakes than the other side.And du Pengyu's active score and loss of points are similar to those of Peach Tian Xianduo, and there is no great difference in the men's doubles competition. In the men's doubles competition, the players of both sides also choose the service landing points mainly in the area of 1 and 5, and receive the serve.Both sides to push the ball and put the main netting, other techniques are less used.And in the third shot technique, blocking and pushing balls became the main choice. The use of these two techniques by both sides was far more than that of other techniques in the men's doubles. In the case of winning or losing points, the Chinese team scored more points than the Japanese team and lost points.And more than each other.In terms of tactics, both sides adopt the former and the post-attack tactics, and the technology of attacking the middle road gradually loses its dominant position.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G847

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱君明;彭靜;;世界優(yōu)秀羽毛球男子單打得分特征分析與研究[J];商;2013年08期

2 高偉華;王德平;;第30界奧運(yùn)會(huì)羽毛球男子單打決賽后場技戰(zhàn)術(shù)對(duì)比分析[J];科技信息;2013年12期

3 佘曦;陳滔;關(guān)欣;;中外羽毛球男雙運(yùn)動(dòng)員得分技術(shù)的分析與研究[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

4 李金健;;倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)羽毛球男子單打決賽技戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用分析[J];體育世界(下旬刊);2013年01期

5 劉秀峰;;2012年倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)羽毛球男子單打決賽林丹vs李宗偉技術(shù)對(duì)比分析[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年05期

6 鞏毅;董亞釗;;廣州亞運(yùn)會(huì)羽毛球男子單打決賽技術(shù)分析[J];德州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

7 劉星玉;趙國彤;佘曦;;優(yōu)秀羽毛球男單運(yùn)動(dòng)員技戰(zhàn)術(shù)數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];體育師友;2012年03期

8 寇廣寧;;對(duì)羽毛球男子單打選手技戰(zhàn)術(shù)分析[J];內(nèi)江科技;2011年02期

9 沈連梅;鄭賀;;現(xiàn)代羽毛球運(yùn)動(dòng)發(fā)展的競技特征與趨勢研究[J];淮北煤炭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年03期

10 陳哲;方立;孫秀娟;;對(duì)羽毛球運(yùn)動(dòng)員林丹主要得分手段與得分能力的研究[J];體育成人教育學(xué)刊;2010年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1742085