本文選題：內(nèi)線球員　切入點(diǎn)：進(jìn)攻能力　出處：《北京體育大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著當(dāng)代籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)的蓬勃發(fā)展,籃球比賽中的技巧、戰(zhàn)術(shù)也日臻完善。內(nèi)線球員不僅需要具有強(qiáng)悍的得分能力,也善于采取助攻和策應(yīng)等助攻方式。因此,球隊(duì)在進(jìn)攻時(shí),內(nèi)線球員的活躍可以極大地緩解外線隊(duì)員的進(jìn)攻壓力,從而帶活了全隊(duì)的技戰(zhàn)術(shù)術(shù)實(shí)施,在比賽中占據(jù)有利位置。中國男籃同成為世界級(jí)的優(yōu)秀男籃強(qiáng)隊(duì)還存在著一定的差距,首當(dāng)其沖的就是內(nèi)線球員的選拔和培養(yǎng)。而隨著國家隊(duì)內(nèi)世界級(jí)內(nèi)線球員姚明的退役,中國隊(duì)內(nèi)涌現(xiàn)出的后起之秀們距離世界級(jí)優(yōu)秀球員還具有很長(zhǎng)的一段距離要奮斗。本文主要研究?jī)?nèi)線球員的進(jìn)攻能力,通過對(duì)在第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中,中國男籃和男籃四強(qiáng)球隊(duì)內(nèi)線球員的進(jìn)攻能力這一方面研究入手,透過比賽數(shù)據(jù)分析出上述兩者之間存在的差距,并給出相應(yīng)的合理化建議有:1、中國隊(duì)內(nèi)線球員與四強(qiáng)內(nèi)線球員在身體條件上不占優(yōu)勢(shì),主要體現(xiàn)在體重和克托萊指數(shù)方面,中國隊(duì)內(nèi)線球員身材普遍偏瘦,在強(qiáng)對(duì)抗條件下進(jìn)攻不占優(yōu)勢(shì)。2、中國內(nèi)線球員進(jìn)攻技術(shù)、進(jìn)攻方式過于單一。進(jìn)攻時(shí)相比于四強(qiáng)球隊(duì)球員進(jìn)攻方式簡(jiǎn)單,過于依賴中遠(yuǎn)距離的中投。進(jìn)攻位置低位進(jìn)攻次數(shù)較少,多為高位進(jìn)攻手段。3、中國隊(duì)內(nèi)線隊(duì)員與四強(qiáng)球隊(duì)內(nèi)線球員在拼搶前場(chǎng)籃板方面相比是有一定差距。籃板球拼搶意識(shí)較為薄弱,拼搶籃板球技術(shù)較為單一。搶到籃板后二次意識(shí)薄弱,無法造成有效殺傷。4、中國國內(nèi)線球員參與進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合的策應(yīng)意識(shí)較四強(qiáng)球隊(duì)內(nèi)線球員較為薄弱。傳球意識(shí)薄弱且傳球手段較為單一。5、中國內(nèi)線球員與四強(qiáng)球隊(duì)內(nèi)線球員相比基本功較差。進(jìn)攻技術(shù)較為粗糙,運(yùn)球能力、傳球細(xì)節(jié)等有一定差距。
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of contemporary basketball, the techniques and tactics in basketball match are becoming more and more perfect. The inside players not only need to have strong scoring ability, but also be good at taking assistant attack and strategy, etc. Therefore, when the team is attacking, The active inline players can greatly relieve the offensive pressure of the outside players, thus bringing the whole team's techniques and tactics into practice and occupying a favorable position in the match. There is still a certain gap between the Chinese men's basketball team and the strong teams of the world class excellent men's basketball teams. The first to bear the brunt is the selection and training of internal players. And with the retirement of Yao Ming, a world-class domestic player in the national team, There is still a long way to go before the rising stars emerge from the Chinese team. This paper mainly studies the offensive ability of the inside players. Starting with the research on the attacking ability of the inner line players of the top four teams of the Chinese men's basketball team and the men's basketball team, the gap between the above two teams is analyzed through the match data. The corresponding rationalization suggestions are given as follows: 1: 1, the Chinese team's inner players and the top four players do not have an advantage in physical conditions, mainly reflected in the body weight and the Ketole index, the Chinese team's inside players are generally thin. Under the condition of strong confrontation, there is no advantage in attack. 2. The attacking technique of Chinese inner line players is too simple. The attack mode is simpler than that of the top four team players. Relying too much on the middle and long distance CIC. The attack position low attack frequency is less, Most of them are high offensive means. 3. Compared with the top four team players, there is a certain gap between the Chinese team and the top four team players in the front court rebound, the sense of rebounding is relatively weak, The rebound technique is relatively simple. After the rebound, the second time consciousness is weak, Unable to cause effective killing. 4, China's domestic line players' response consciousness of participating in the basic cooperation of offensive tactics is weaker than that of the top four teams' inner line players, the passing consciousness is weak and the passing method is single. 5, Chinese inside line players and the four top four players are weaker than those in the top four teams. The players on the inside of the team are inferior to their basic skills. The offensive techniques are rough. Dribbling ability, passing details and so on there is a certain gap.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G841

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周占軍,劉宏宇,何少鈞;2001年至2002年全國甲A男籃內(nèi)線防守現(xiàn)狀分析[J];東莞理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

2 何少鈞;我國甲A男籃內(nèi)線防守現(xiàn)狀與方法的研究[J];福建體育科技;2004年04期

3 馬濤;;籃球從防守外線過渡到防守內(nèi)線的技術(shù)及方法[J];十堰職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

4 陳國慰;對(duì)籃球內(nèi)線隊(duì)員投籃方式的探討[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1990年02期

5 王居堂;王新維;;近籃區(qū)內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻初探[J];哈爾濱體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1991年04期

6 宋旭;;如何提高籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)員內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻能力[J];吉林體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

7 宋旭;析籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)員內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻能力的提高[J];四川體育科學(xué);1998年01期

8 韋紹華;;試論籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)員內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻能力的提高[J];體育世界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2011年06期

9 彭勇;論籃球內(nèi)線隊(duì)員對(duì)籃球比賽的影響[J];泰安師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

10 黃越;吳亞婷;王鋒斌;;亞洲男籃內(nèi)線技戰(zhàn)術(shù)發(fā)展新特征——以26屆亞洲男籃錦標(biāo)賽為例[J];搏擊(體育論壇);2014年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 崔魯祥;郭永波;張戈;;第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)男籃比賽國內(nèi)外內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻技術(shù)特點(diǎn)的研究[A];自主創(chuàng)新與持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)第十一屆中國科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集（3）[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 張衛(wèi)平;教你打籃球[N];中國體育報(bào);2000年

2 江蘇省 何光周;國家男籃的六大問題[N];中國體育報(bào);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 光暉;山西興瑞女籃技戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征分析[D];山西大學(xué);2014年

2 仝菲;中外優(yōu)秀內(nèi)線隊(duì)員持球貼身進(jìn)攻技術(shù)運(yùn)用特征對(duì)比研究[D];天津體育學(xué)院;2015年

3 郭新宇;第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國男籃和對(duì)手內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合的運(yùn)用研究[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2017年

4 莫其呂;第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國男籃與前四名球隊(duì)內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻方式的比較研究[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2017年

5 李云鑌;第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國男籃與四強(qiáng)球隊(duì)內(nèi)線球員進(jìn)攻能力的對(duì)比研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2017年

6 薛森友;2015-2016NBA季后賽八強(qiáng)內(nèi)線球員攻防技術(shù)特點(diǎn)研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2017年

7 張聯(lián)泉;第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中、外女籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻特點(diǎn)比較研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

8 李星;第三十屆倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)中外男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的比較研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2013年

9 陳杰;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻“位置模糊”特征的研究[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2014年

10 張彥;對(duì)第26屆男籃亞錦賽中、外內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的比較分析[D];山西大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1658557