基于平衡計分卡的高校科研成果評價研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-08-01 08:30
【摘要】:高校的科研水平是一國科學(xué)技術(shù)實力的重要標(biāo)志,高校的科研活動既能為提高教學(xué)質(zhì)量、培養(yǎng)高層次人才創(chuàng)造基礎(chǔ)條件,又能為社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展提供最新的科技成果。高校的科研成果作為科研勞動的結(jié)晶,對其進行科學(xué)評價不僅是科研管理工作的重要組成部分,,又是監(jiān)督、導(dǎo)向、反饋高?蒲泄ぷ鞯闹匾侄。 本文首先對國內(nèi)外高?蒲谐晒u價相關(guān)研究進行梳理,闡述了平衡計分卡(Balanced Score Card,簡稱BSC)的相關(guān)理論,對其評價高?蒲谐晒目尚行赃M行了分析。其次,構(gòu)建基于平衡計分卡的高?蒲谐晒u價指標(biāo)體系,在明確評價目標(biāo)、指標(biāo)選取原則的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒BSC模型,結(jié)合高校科研成果評價的特點對BSC的四個維度進行修正,構(gòu)造了科研經(jīng)費、社會評價及認(rèn)可度、科研實力、學(xué)習(xí)與成長四個層面,共18個主要評價指標(biāo)。再次,采取層次分析法確定指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,收集相關(guān)指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù),確定評價標(biāo)準(zhǔn),構(gòu)建出具體的評價指標(biāo)體系。最后,以F大學(xué)為案例,對F大學(xué)科研成果進行評價,并根據(jù)評價結(jié)果提出相關(guān)對策建議。 本文的創(chuàng)新點在于借鑒BSC的功能和結(jié)構(gòu),將高校的戰(zhàn)略設(shè)定與科研成果評價有機結(jié)合,構(gòu)建出適應(yīng)高校科研發(fā)展的評價指標(biāo)體系,幫助高校明確科研的方向及指導(dǎo)具體科研活動,為推動高?蒲泄ぷ鞯陌l(fā)展及高校科研成果評價提供了新的思路。
[Abstract]:The level of scientific research in colleges and universities is an important symbol of a country's scientific and technological strength. The scientific research activities of colleges and universities can not only create basic conditions for improving teaching quality and cultivating high-level talents, but also provide the latest scientific and technological achievements for the development of social economy. As the crystallization of scientific research work, scientific evaluation is not only an important part of scientific research management, but also an important means to supervise, guide and feedback scientific research work in colleges and universities. This paper firstly combs the relevant research on the evaluation of scientific research achievement in colleges and universities at home and abroad, expounds the relevant theory of (Balanced Score Card, (balanced Scorecard for short), and analyzes the feasibility of evaluating the scientific research results of colleges and universities. Secondly, based on balanced scorecard, the evaluation index system of scientific research achievement in colleges and universities is constructed. On the basis of defining the evaluation objectives and selecting principles, using BSC model for reference, the four dimensions of BSC are revised in combination with the characteristics of evaluation of scientific research achievements in colleges and universities. This paper constructs four levels of scientific research funds, social evaluation and recognition, scientific research strength, learning and growth, a total of 18 main evaluation indicators. Thirdly, using AHP to determine the weight of the index, collect the relevant index data, determine the evaluation criteria, and build a specific evaluation index system. Finally, taking F University as a case, this paper evaluates the scientific research results of F University, and puts forward relevant countermeasures and suggestions according to the evaluation results. The innovation of this paper lies in drawing lessons from the function and structure of BSC, combining the strategic setting of colleges and universities with the evaluation of scientific research results, and constructing an evaluation index system suitable for the development of scientific research in colleges and universities. To help colleges and universities clear the direction of scientific research and guide specific scientific research activities, to promote the development of scientific research in colleges and universities and the evaluation of scientific research results provide a new way of thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:G644
本文編號:2156989
[Abstract]:The level of scientific research in colleges and universities is an important symbol of a country's scientific and technological strength. The scientific research activities of colleges and universities can not only create basic conditions for improving teaching quality and cultivating high-level talents, but also provide the latest scientific and technological achievements for the development of social economy. As the crystallization of scientific research work, scientific evaluation is not only an important part of scientific research management, but also an important means to supervise, guide and feedback scientific research work in colleges and universities. This paper firstly combs the relevant research on the evaluation of scientific research achievement in colleges and universities at home and abroad, expounds the relevant theory of (Balanced Score Card, (balanced Scorecard for short), and analyzes the feasibility of evaluating the scientific research results of colleges and universities. Secondly, based on balanced scorecard, the evaluation index system of scientific research achievement in colleges and universities is constructed. On the basis of defining the evaluation objectives and selecting principles, using BSC model for reference, the four dimensions of BSC are revised in combination with the characteristics of evaluation of scientific research achievements in colleges and universities. This paper constructs four levels of scientific research funds, social evaluation and recognition, scientific research strength, learning and growth, a total of 18 main evaluation indicators. Thirdly, using AHP to determine the weight of the index, collect the relevant index data, determine the evaluation criteria, and build a specific evaluation index system. Finally, taking F University as a case, this paper evaluates the scientific research results of F University, and puts forward relevant countermeasures and suggestions according to the evaluation results. The innovation of this paper lies in drawing lessons from the function and structure of BSC, combining the strategic setting of colleges and universities with the evaluation of scientific research results, and constructing an evaluation index system suitable for the development of scientific research in colleges and universities. To help colleges and universities clear the direction of scientific research and guide specific scientific research activities, to promote the development of scientific research in colleges and universities and the evaluation of scientific research results provide a new way of thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:G644
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 袁銳鍔,胡安娜;英國高等教育的科研評估[J];比較教育研究;2003年10期
2 肖春;毛詩焙;;高校科研團隊與研究生創(chuàng)新人才培養(yǎng)[J];黑龍江高教研究;2011年06期
3 范文曜,張偉;英國高等教育的評估和大學(xué)撥款[J];理工高教研究;2003年06期
4 高宏利;李作學(xué);王前;;高?蒲性u估指標(biāo)及其實證研究[J];教育科學(xué);2011年02期
5 劉文達,邰忠智,李光澤;淺談高校科研評估體系的構(gòu)建[J];科技管理研究;1999年01期
6 鄭存庫;學(xué)術(shù)交流對地方高?茖W(xué)研究的推動作用[J];科技管理研究;2005年03期
7 費宇,李俊梅;論高校科研管理與人才培養(yǎng)[J];科技·人才·市場;1999年02期
8 朱永峰;;高?蒲性u價研究綜述[J];科技信息;2009年34期
9 王憑慧;科學(xué)研究項目評估方法綜述[J];科研管理;1999年03期
10 楊育華;試論社會科學(xué)研究成果的評價[J];寧夏社會科學(xué);2002年05期
本文編號:2156989
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/2156989.html
最近更新
教材專著