本文選題：大學(xué)生 + 孝道�。� 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本研究以大學(xué)生為對象,采用自編的大學(xué)生孝道問卷和已有的親社會(huì)行為問卷進(jìn)行調(diào)查,考察大學(xué)生的孝道及親社會(huì)行為特點(diǎn)；同時(shí)對孝道與親社會(huì)行為之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行探究,以期為大學(xué)生的家庭、學(xué)校和社會(huì)教育提供一定的理論依據(jù)。研究結(jié)果表明: (1)自編的大學(xué)生孝道問卷包括孝道認(rèn)知、孝道情感、孝道行為三個(gè)維度。問卷具有良好的信效度。 (2)大學(xué)生孝道處于中上水平,其中孝道認(rèn)知水平最高。 (3)大學(xué)生孝道總分在性別、專業(yè)類型、生源地、是否獨(dú)生子女、是否學(xué)生干部上存在顯著性差異；在年級(jí)上不存在顯著性差異。其中男女大學(xué)生在孝道三個(gè)維度上均存在顯著性差異,而孝道行為在專業(yè)類型、生源地、是否獨(dú)生子女、是否學(xué)生干部上均存在顯著性差異。 (4)大學(xué)生親社會(huì)行為的總體特點(diǎn)是緊急親社會(huì)行為水平最高,公開親社會(huì)行為水平最低。 (5)大學(xué)生親社會(huì)行為總分在生源地、是否獨(dú)生子女上存在顯著性差異；在性別、年級(jí)、專業(yè)類型、是否學(xué)生干部上不存在顯著性差異。其中公開親社會(huì)行為在性別、是否獨(dú)生子女上存在顯著性差異；依從親社會(huì)行為在性別、年級(jí)、是否學(xué)生干部上存在顯著性差異；情緒性親社會(huì)行為在性別、是否獨(dú)生子女上存在顯著性差異；利他親社會(huì)行為在年級(jí)上存在顯著性差異；緊急親社會(huì)行為在不同生源地上存在顯著性差異。 (6)大學(xué)生孝道及其各維度與親社會(huì)行為均呈顯著正相關(guān),且對親社會(huì)行為均有顯著的預(yù)測作用。
[Abstract]:This research takes the university student as the object, uses the university student filial piety questionnaire and the existing prosocial behavior questionnaire to carry on the investigation, investigates the university student's filial piety and the prosocial behavior characteristic, simultaneously carries on the research to the filial piety and the prosocial behavior relations. In order to provide a certain theoretical basis for the family, school and social education of college students. The results show that: The questionnaire includes three dimensions: filial piety cognition, filial piety emotion and filial piety behavior. The questionnaire has good reliability and validity. 2) filial piety of college students is at the middle and upper level, among which filial piety cognition is the highest. 3) the total scores of filial piety of college students were significantly different in sex, type of major, place of origin of students, only child, student cadre, and no significant difference was found in grade. There are significant differences in the three dimensions of filial piety between male and female college students, while there are significant differences in filial piety behavior in the types of majors, places of origin of students, whether the only child is the only child, and whether the student cadres are students. 4) the general characteristics of prosocial behavior of college students are the highest level of emergency prosocial behavior and the lowest level of open prosocial behavior. 5) the total score of prosocial behavior of college students was significantly different from that of the only child in the place of students' origin, and there was no significant difference in gender, grade, professional type and student cadres. Among them, there are significant differences in the sex of the public pro-social behavior, whether the only child is the only child, the difference of the affective pro-social behavior in the gender, the grade, the student cadre, the emotional pro-social behavior in the gender, Whether there is significant difference in only child; altruistic pro-social behavior in grade; emergency pro-social behavior in different sources of significant differences. 6) filial piety and its dimensions were positively correlated with prosocial behavior, and had significant predictive effect on prosocial behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G641

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 俞國良;社會(huì)認(rèn)知視野中的親社會(huì)行為[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年01期

2 范翠英;潘清泉;游志麒;劉華山;;兒童道德脫離的影響因素及其與社會(huì)行為的關(guān)系[J];心理與行為研究;2012年03期

3 劉新玲;對傳統(tǒng)“孝道”的繼承和超越——大學(xué)生“孝”觀念調(diào)查[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

4 朱靜敏;張慧影;李亞偉;;情緒與親社會(huì)行為關(guān)系的研究綜述[J];價(jià)值工程;2010年08期

5 侯欣一;孝與漢代法制[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年04期

6 鄭曉江;孝的倫理內(nèi)蘊(yùn)及現(xiàn)代歸位[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年04期

7 駱承烈;孝道新解[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;1993年01期

8 鄧凌;大學(xué)生孝道觀的調(diào)查研究[J];青年研究;2004年11期

9 張坤;;青少年期親子關(guān)系的特點(diǎn)及其與傳統(tǒng)孝道態(tài)度的關(guān)系[J];青少年研究(山東省團(tuán)校學(xué)報(bào));2006年04期

10 魏鑫e，

本文編號(hào)：1924191