本文選題：高校課堂教學 + 評價體系��； 參考：《西北大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：高等教育在規(guī)模快速擴張,邁入大眾化的同時,教育質量越來越成為人們關注的焦點。課堂教學作為高校教學活動的主要組織形式,傳授給學生系統(tǒng)的科學文化知識和專業(yè)技能,培養(yǎng)學生的思維能力,是確保教育質量的關鍵。而客觀公正的課堂教學評價不僅能調動教師教學工作的積極性,促進教師專業(yè)發(fā)展,還能促使學生更積極、主動的學習,對課堂教學具有改善、激勵、鑒定等作用,是提高課堂教學水平的重要手段。因此在高等教育質量備受爭議的今天,研究課堂教學評價體系及方法十分必要和重要。 本文運用調查研究法和主成分分析法,借助于Excel統(tǒng)計分析軟件,在系統(tǒng)梳理國內外有關課堂教學評價研究歷史和現(xiàn)狀的基礎上,通過搜集68所不同類型和層次高校的課堂教學評價量表或方案,從評價主體、評價組織、評價方法、評價內容、評價結果等幾個方面對其現(xiàn)狀進行系統(tǒng)的分析,從分析結果來看目前高校課堂教學評價存在著以下幾方面突出問題：一是缺乏外部評價機制的引入；二是評價指標體系設計對定性定量關系處理不當；三是評價要素關注教師行為忽視學生行為；四是指標體系的構建缺乏科學論證,學科針對性不強；五是評價結果的回饋機制不健全。 針對目前高校課堂教學評價體系及方法存在的問題,本文通過對課堂教學的本質、課堂教學在人才培養(yǎng)中的作用、課堂教學的要素和有效教學等理論分析,結合對現(xiàn)行課堂教學評價的反思,從教師行為、學生行為、課堂結構、師生關系、教學效率五個方面,對課堂教學評價的內容進行了重構；并提出了以聽課面談、教師反思、學生評價、畢業(yè)生和社會成員評價為主的多元化的評價方法。最后從樹立多元化的評價觀,構建完善的課堂教學評價制度,采取多元化的課堂教學評價方法三個方面,提出了完善課堂教學評價體系的路徑。
[Abstract]:With the rapid expansion and popularization of higher education, the quality of higher education has become the focus of more and more attention.Classroom teaching is the main organizational form of teaching activities in colleges and universities. The key to ensure the quality of education is to impart to students systematic scientific and cultural knowledge and professional skills and to cultivate students' thinking ability.The objective and fair evaluation of classroom teaching can not only arouse the enthusiasm of teachers' teaching work and promote the professional development of teachers, but also promote students to study more actively and actively, which can improve, motivate and identify the classroom teaching.It is an important means to improve the level of classroom teaching.Therefore, it is necessary and important to study the evaluation system and methods of classroom teaching at a time when the quality of higher education is controversial.In this paper, by means of the method of investigation and principal component analysis, and with the help of Excel software, this paper systematically reviews the history and present situation of classroom teaching evaluation at home and abroad.Through collecting the classroom teaching evaluation scale or scheme of 68 colleges and universities of different types and levels, this paper makes a systematic analysis of its present situation from the aspects of evaluation subject, evaluation organization, evaluation method, evaluation content, evaluation result and so on.From the analysis results, there are some outstanding problems in the evaluation of classroom teaching in colleges and universities in the following aspects: the first is the lack of external evaluation mechanism, the other is the improper handling of the qualitative and quantitative relationship by the design of the evaluation index system;Third, the evaluation elements pay attention to teachers' behavior and ignore students' behavior; fourth, the construction of index system is lack of scientific proof, and the discipline is not targeted; fifthly, the feedback mechanism of evaluation results is not perfect.In view of the problems existing in the evaluation system and methods of classroom teaching in colleges and universities, this paper analyzes the essence of classroom teaching, the role of classroom teaching in the cultivation of talents, the elements of classroom teaching and effective teaching, etc.This paper reconstructs the contents of classroom teaching evaluation from five aspects: teacher's behavior, student's behavior, classroom structure, teacher-student relationship and teaching efficiency, and puts forward that the content of classroom teaching evaluation should be revisited by listening to the class and reflecting on the teacher's reflection.Student evaluation, graduates and social members of the evaluation of the main diversity of evaluation methods.Finally, the author puts forward the way to perfect the evaluation system of classroom teaching from three aspects: setting up a diversified evaluation view, constructing a perfect evaluation system of classroom teaching and adopting diversified methods of classroom teaching evaluation.
【學位授予單位】：西北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G642.0

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 畢菁華;;建立課堂教學質量評價體系的實踐性探索[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年S2期

2 呂立杰;趙同友;;課堂評價的有效性反思與研究性功能轉向——兼談課堂學習研究對教師專業(yè)發(fā)展的意義[J];東北師大學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年02期

3 國景星;;課堂教學質量評價中存在的問題及完善評價體系的設想[J];高教論壇;2010年07期

4 肖川;高校有效教學的目標和特征[J];高等教育研究;1999年03期

5 李靜;孫昌盛;;美國高校教學質量評價指標體系的特點及啟示[J];黑龍江高教研究;2009年11期

6 史曉燕;現(xiàn)行課堂教學評價模式評析[J];河北師范大學學報(教育科學版);2000年02期

7 潘懋元;;規(guī)模、速度、質量、特色——中國當前高等教育發(fā)展中的若干問題[J];河北師范大學學報(教育科學版);2007年01期

8 李光耀;肖紅;劉承棟;;高校課堂教學質量評價指標體系的思考與設計[J];高等建筑教育;2009年01期

9 宋瑞文;;高校課堂教學評價的初步研究[J];吉林教育;2009年13期

10 樸金花;王昭;張鵬霞;;高校課堂教學評價模式研究[J];佳木斯大學社會科學學報;2006年03期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 本報記者　蔣建華　林雪卿　劉驚鐸;[N];中國教育報;2005年

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 鄭家成;高校課堂教學評價標準研究[D];河海大學;2004年

2 潘娟;教師課堂教學評價標準重構[D];首都師范大學;2004年

3 楊鴻;高校課堂教學質量評價標準的研究[D];中國地質大學（北京）;2006年

4 李明;高校課堂教學質量評價體系的構建與應用研究[D];華北電力大學（河北）;2009年

，

本文編號：1739181