本文選題：遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科 + 科學(xué)研究��； 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)的分類緣于人類認(rèn)識(shí)的局限，這種分類確實(shí)促進(jìn)了學(xué)科與科學(xué)研究的發(fā)展。但隨著社會(huì)及科學(xué)的發(fā)展，單一學(xué)科所開展的研究已遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿足實(shí)際需要，遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究便應(yīng)需而生。遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究的出現(xiàn)不僅是科學(xué)發(fā)展的自身邏輯，是社會(huì)的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要，更對(duì)高等學(xué)校的發(fā)展有著重要意義。華中科技大學(xué)在其發(fā)展歷程中，依托學(xué)校的強(qiáng)大的理工科優(yōu)勢(shì)，發(fā)展出獨(dú)具特色的人文社會(huì)科學(xué)，取得了一定的成績(jī)，產(chǎn)生了重大的反響。那么，華中科技大學(xué)的遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究的發(fā)展目前到底處于何種水平，，是否存在著一些不足，對(duì)此如何改進(jìn)，這是本研究試圖解決的問題。 本研究選取北京大學(xué)、清華大學(xué)等六所研究型大學(xué)作為華中科技大學(xué)同型比較的對(duì)象，對(duì)七所高校近十年來公開發(fā)表的遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究論文進(jìn)行篩選與統(tǒng)計(jì)。華中科技大學(xué)的遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究的總數(shù)和總次數(shù)分別為153和168，均處于七所學(xué)校中的中下水平。根據(jù)收集的數(shù)據(jù)，利用Ucinet軟件構(gòu)建七所高校的遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究的社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)圖，并對(duì)各自網(wǎng)絡(luò)圖的密度、中心度以及結(jié)點(diǎn)間平均距離等指標(biāo)進(jìn)行計(jì)算。得到的結(jié)果是，華中科技大學(xué)的遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究的網(wǎng)絡(luò)密度為0.1267，結(jié)點(diǎn)間平均距離為2.706，這兩項(xiàng)數(shù)據(jù)在七所學(xué)校中均排在第六。依照數(shù)據(jù)與相關(guān)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)圖，可以得到的結(jié)論是華中科技大學(xué)遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究發(fā)展在七所高校中處于中下水平，存在著網(wǎng)絡(luò)密度較低、網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)點(diǎn)之間距離偏大、高中心度的結(jié)點(diǎn)偏少及網(wǎng)絡(luò)的穩(wěn)固性較差等不足。 在此基礎(chǔ)上，本研究對(duì)遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究發(fā)展較好的三所學(xué)校清華大學(xué)、浙江大學(xué)及復(fù)旦大學(xué)進(jìn)行研究，發(fā)現(xiàn)三校從組織、資金及人員等方面對(duì)遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究進(jìn)行政策的支持，并且積極建設(shè)相應(yīng)的遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究平臺(tái)以促進(jìn)研究的開展。而華中科技大學(xué)在這些方面與這幾所高校有著明顯的差距。有鑒于此，本研究便從學(xué)校相關(guān)政策的支持與科研平臺(tái)的建設(shè)兩個(gè)方面著手，提出相應(yīng)的對(duì)策以促進(jìn)華中科技大學(xué)遠(yuǎn)緣跨學(xué)科研究的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The classification of knowledge is due to the limitation of human cognition, and it really promotes the development of subject and scientific research.However, with the development of society and science, the research carried out by a single subject is far from satisfying the actual needs.The emergence of distant interdisciplinary research is not only the logic of scientific development, but also the practical need of society, and it is of great significance to the development of colleges and universities.In its development process, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, relying on its strong advantages of science and engineering, developed a unique humanities and social sciences, and achieved certain results, which has produced a significant response.So, what is the level of the far interdisciplinary research in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, whether there are some deficiencies, and how to improve it, which is the problem this study is trying to solve.In this study, six research universities, such as Peking University and Tsinghua University, were selected as the objects of homotypic comparison of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and the distant interdisciplinary research papers published by seven universities in recent ten years were screened and counted.The total number and total number of distant interdisciplinary studies in Huazhong University of Science and Technology are 153 and 168, respectively, which are at the middle and lower levels of the seven schools.According to the collected data, the social network map of distant interdisciplinary research in seven universities is constructed by using Ucinet software, and the density, center degree and average distance between nodes of each network chart are calculated.The results show that the network density and the average distance between nodes are 0.1267 and 2.706, respectively. The two data are ranked sixth among the seven schools in Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Huazhong University of Science and Technology).According to the data and the related network diagram, the conclusion can be drawn that the far interdisciplinary research and development of Huazhong University of Science and Technology is at the middle and lower level in the seven universities, and the network density is low, and the distance between the network nodes is relatively large.The node of high center degree is less and the stability of network is poor.On the basis of this, this study has carried out the research on three universities, Tsinghua University, Zhejiang University and Fudan University, which have better development of distant interdisciplinary research. It is found that the three schools support the remote interdisciplinary research from the aspects of organization, funds and personnel.And actively build the corresponding distant interdisciplinary research platform to promote the development of research.Huazhong University of Science and Technology in these areas and these universities have a clear gap.In view of this, this study starts with the support of school policies and the construction of scientific research platform, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures to promote the development of far interdisciplinary research in Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G642

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭曉瑛;;交叉學(xué)科的重要性及其發(fā)展[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

2 張煒,鄒曉東;現(xiàn)代大學(xué)跨學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)組織新型模式研究——名古屋大學(xué)的流動(dòng)型教育和研究系統(tǒng)(編譯)[J];比較教育研究;2003年06期

3 張煒;德國(guó)柏林工業(yè)大學(xué)的跨學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)組織[J];比較教育研究;2003年09期

4 吳琦來;魏薇;;日本高等教育交叉學(xué)科建設(shè)的范例及其啟示[J];比較教育研究;2008年03期

5 程齊凱;;檔案學(xué)合著網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究[J];檔案管理;2009年05期

6 劉杰,陸君安;一個(gè)小型科研合作復(fù)雜網(wǎng)絡(luò)及其分析[J];復(fù)雜系統(tǒng)與復(fù)雜性科學(xué);2004年03期

7 潘云鶴,顧建民;大學(xué)學(xué)科的發(fā)展與重構(gòu)[J];高等工程教育研究;1999年03期

8 文洪朝;;跨學(xué)科研究——當(dāng)今科學(xué)發(fā)展的顯著特征[J];西北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

9 葉紅波;跨學(xué)科研究的興起及其基本形式[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);1995年06期

10 周濟(jì);;構(gòu)筑創(chuàng)新平臺(tái) 建設(shè)優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科加快世界一流大學(xué)和高水平研究型大學(xué)建設(shè)——在“985工程”二期建設(shè)工作會(huì)議上的講話(錄音整理稿)[J];中華人民共和國(guó)教育部公報(bào);2004年09期

本文編號(hào)：1734478