本文選題：高校　切入點：學術不端　出處：《廣西大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,學術不端事件禁而不止,其治理進入了“攻堅期”,其突出表現(xiàn)為違規(guī)者職務、職稱、社會地位增高,項目與管理腐敗不斷增加,科研經費腐敗、錢學交易嚴重等等。種種學術不端破壞了學術的嚴肅性,阻礙了人才的培養(yǎng),阻礙了學術的健康發(fā)展,損害了高校的聲譽,以至于顛覆了社會的誠信體系。高校學術不端行為之所以會成為一種社會“通病”,其成因是多方面的,不僅有行政過分干預學術限制學術自由的因素,也有高校自身學術評價體系以及學術界流行的“馬太效應”導致學術資源分配不公的因素,與國家相關法律法規(guī)的缺失、社會輿論監(jiān)督功能的不足也有重要關系,而學者自身的學術道德失范則是學術不端行為發(fā)生的重要內因。從治理理論出發(fā),認為治理高校學術不端,需要政府、高校及學者三個層面的合作互動。在政府治理方面,首先是要轉變政府的職能及角色,使政府不再是高校教育管理的唯一權力中心；要成立專門機構拓寬監(jiān)督渠道,完善法律法規(guī)加大懲處力度,同時也要設立舉報網站,加強輿論監(jiān)督等；高校則要加強自治,改革學術管理制度如學術評價及獎懲機制、專著出版與論文發(fā)表機制等；作為學術活動的主體,學者也要加強自身的學術道德修養(yǎng),以德治學。只有政府、高校及學者三方共同努力,建立起一種合作服務式的治理體系,高校學術不端行為才能從根本上得到遏制。
[Abstract]:In recent years, academic misconduct Jinerbuzhi, its governance has entered a crucial period, the outstanding performance for the illegal positions, titles, social status increased, and project management of corruption continue to increase research funding, corruption, money trading and so on. All sorts of serious misconduct undermines the seriousness of academic, hinders the cultivation of talents, hinder the healthy development of the academic, damage the reputation of universities, to subvert the social credit system. Academic misconduct has become a social common problem, its causes are many, not only has the administrative intervention factors of academic restrictions on academic freedom, there are universities and academic academic evaluation system the popular "Matthew effect" factors that lead to the unfair distribution of academic resources, and lack of relevant national laws and regulations, lack of supervision of public opinion function also has an important relationship, and scholars The anomie of academic morality is the important internal cause of academic misconduct. Starting from the theory of governance, governance that academic misconduct, the need for government, cooperation and interaction between three levels of universities and scholars. In terms of governance, the first is to change the government function and role, the government is no longer the only power center of higher education management; to set up special institutions to broaden the channels of supervision, improve laws and regulations to increase the punishment, but also to set up a reporting website, strengthen the supervision of public opinion; colleges and universities should strengthen the reform of management system such as academic autonomy, academic evaluation and incentive mechanism, and the mechanism of monographs; as a subject of academic activities, scholars have to strengthen the academic moral self-cultivation, by virtue of learning. Only the government, universities and scholars from three countries to establish a cooperative governance system service, college student The misconduct of the art can be fundamentally restrained.

【學位授予單位】：廣西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G644

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 王彬彬;;汪暉《反抗絕望——魯迅及其文學世界》的學風問題[J];文藝研究;2010年03期

2 余三定;新時期學術規(guī)范討論的歷時性評述[J];云夢學刊;2005年01期

3 韓宇;王國騫;李安;;美國國家科學基金會對學術不端行為的法律規(guī)制[J];中國基礎科學;2009年06期

4 吳勇;朱衛(wèi)東;;科研基金項目負責人信譽評價體系研究[J];中國科技論壇;2007年11期

，

本文編號：1721647