本文選題：科研評價　切入點(diǎn)：指標(biāo)體系　出處：《云南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：云南省教育廳自然科學(xué)基金在云南大學(xué)內(nèi)部存在科研人員申報積極性不高,立項數(shù)目比較少的現(xiàn)象。通過調(diào)研發(fā)現(xiàn),科研人員普遍反映對教育廳自然科學(xué)基金感興趣度不高的原因主要在于教育廳自然科學(xué)基金資助額度較少不能滿足研究需要、上級部門對于廳級科研項目的績效獎勵力度沒有國家級科研項目的獎勵力度大等。同時,科研人員希望上級部門提高教育廳自然科學(xué)基金資助額度的愿望越來越強(qiáng)烈。高等院校是知識創(chuàng)新和知識傳播的主體,在國家自主創(chuàng)新體系中起著生力軍的作用,是我國重要的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新隊伍。開展省教育廳自然科學(xué)基金科研活動的科研人員作為這支隊伍的一員到底有沒有奉獻(xiàn)出智慧和力量?云南大學(xué)開展教育廳自然科學(xué)基金項目研究,在我國科技創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動戰(zhàn)略中到底有沒有貢獻(xiàn)度?本文對省教育廳自然科學(xué)基金的科研水平進(jìn)行了一個科學(xué)、真實(shí)的評價。 本文系統(tǒng)地分析了國內(nèi)外科研水平評價現(xiàn)狀,結(jié)合云南大學(xué)實(shí)際,運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)查閱法、專家訪談法確立了云南大學(xué)教育廳科研基金項目創(chuàng)新水平評價指標(biāo),利用專家經(jīng)驗(yàn)判斷法確定權(quán)重,構(gòu)建了云南大學(xué)教育廳科研基金項目創(chuàng)新水平評價框架,并以云南大學(xué)近五年來教育廳基金項目數(shù)據(jù)為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行評價,并對評價結(jié)果進(jìn)行了科學(xué)客觀公正的深入分析。通過本文的研究有利于真正樹立云南大學(xué)創(chuàng)新質(zhì)量和實(shí)際貢獻(xiàn)的導(dǎo)向,提升云南大學(xué)科研的創(chuàng)新能力和總體水平。 通過分析云南大學(xué)教育科研基金在創(chuàng)新水平方面體現(xiàn)的薄弱環(huán)節(jié)及優(yōu)勢,努力探尋影響制約云南大學(xué)科研創(chuàng)新能力發(fā)揮的因素,結(jié)合實(shí)際提出建議,提出提升和培育科研創(chuàng)新水平的總體戰(zhàn)略是發(fā)揮優(yōu)勢,加強(qiáng)薄弱,盤活資源,綜合創(chuàng)新。提出為了提高云南大學(xué)科研水平還需更新觀念,加強(qiáng)體制、機(jī)制、能力、文化、管理等方面的創(chuàng)新,激發(fā)勇于創(chuàng)新的積極性,使云南大學(xué)始終保持旺盛的科技創(chuàng)新優(yōu)勢。
[Abstract]:Within Yunnan University, the natural science foundation of Yunnan Education Department has the phenomenon that the enthusiasm of scientific research personnel is not high and the number of projects is relatively small. The reason why researchers generally reported that they were not interested in the Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education was mainly because the amount of funding provided by the Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education could not meet the research needs. At the same time, the departments at the higher level are not as strong as those at the national level in rewarding the performance of scientific research projects at the departmental level. At the same time, Scientific research personnel hope that the higher authorities will increase the amount of funding from the Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education. Institutions of higher learning are the main body of knowledge innovation and knowledge dissemination, and play a vital role in the national independent innovation system. It is an important team of technological innovation in China. Did the scientific research personnel of the Natural Science Foundation of the Provincial Education Department, as one of the members of this team, offer wisdom and strength? Does Yunnan University carry out the research of Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education in China's science and technology innovation drive strategy in the end has the contribution degree? This paper makes a scientific and true evaluation on the scientific research level of the Natural Science Foundation of the Provincial Education Department. This paper systematically analyzes the status quo of scientific research level evaluation at home and abroad, combining with the reality of Yunnan University, using the method of literature review and expert interview, establishes the evaluation index of innovation level of scientific research fund project of Yunnan University Education Department. Using the expert experience judgment method to determine the weight, this paper constructs the evaluation framework of the innovation level of the scientific research fund project of the Department of Education of Yunnan University, and evaluates it on the basis of the project data of the Department of Education Fund of Yunnan University in the past five years. The evaluation results are analyzed scientifically, objectively and impartially. The research in this paper is helpful to set up the orientation of the innovation quality and actual contribution of Yunnan University, and to improve the innovation ability and the overall level of the scientific research of Yunnan University. Based on the analysis of the weak links and advantages of Yunnan University Educational and Scientific Research Foundation in innovation level, this paper tries to find out the factors that restrict Yunnan University's scientific research and innovation ability, and puts forward some suggestions based on the practice. The overall strategy to promote and cultivate the level of scientific research innovation is to give full play to its advantages, strengthen its weakness, invigorate the resources and make comprehensive innovation. It is pointed out that in order to improve the scientific research level of Yunnan University, it is necessary to renew the concept, strengthen the system, mechanism, ability and culture. The innovation in management and so on stimulates the initiative of innovation, and makes Yunnan University keep the strong advantage of scientific and technological innovation all the time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G644

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊兵;彭超群;袁賽前;王海東;;相對影響因子在期刊評價和科研評價中的應(yīng)用[J];編輯學(xué)報;2008年05期

2 馬爾科姆·泰特;李夢洋;;英國科研評估及其對高等教育的影響[J];北京大學(xué)教育評論;2012年03期

3 羅曉燕;歐陽克氙;;以創(chuàng)新和質(zhì)量為導(dǎo)向的高校科研評價機(jī)制改革[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2013年05期

4 李偉;蘇俊宏;;西部地區(qū)地方高�？蒲性u價指標(biāo)研究[J];河南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2012年02期

5 張昊;朱建飛;施群榮;;基于過程和評價激勵的高�？蒲袆�(chuàng)新機(jī)制研究[J];江蘇工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

6 闕維明;高等學(xué)校的科研評價及選優(yōu)排序活動[J];科技管理研究;1999年05期

7 張淵,陸玉梅,梅強(qiáng);科技計劃項目績效評估指標(biāo)體系研究[J];科技管理研究;2005年09期

8 劉艷陽,吳丹青,吳光豪,方永才;SCI用作科研評價指標(biāo)的思考——學(xué)科分布對指標(biāo)公正性的影響[J];科研管理;2003年05期

9 陳樂生;;德國科學(xué)評估經(jīng)驗(yàn)及其對中國科技評估實(shí)踐的啟示[J];科研管理;2008年04期

10 林依;;高校科研績效評價新方法之綜述[J];學(xué)理論;2011年10期

，

本文編號：1665776