【摘要】：目的:比較大學(xué)生高創(chuàng)造傾向與低創(chuàng)造傾向的人格差異,分析高創(chuàng)造傾向大學(xué)生的人格特征。方法:①于2005-10隨機(jī)整群抽取西安地區(qū)在校大學(xué)生700人。均同意參加問卷評估。采用卡氏16種人格量表和自編創(chuàng)造傾向問卷評估人格特殊性征和創(chuàng)造性。16項(xiàng)人格因素問卷共187道題,包括16項(xiàng)根源性人格因素(樂群性、聰慧性、穩(wěn)定性、恃強(qiáng)性、興奮性、有恒性、敢為性、敏感性、懷疑性、幻想性、世故性、憂慮性、實(shí)驗(yàn)性、獨(dú)立性、自律性、緊張性)和4項(xiàng)二級因素(適應(yīng)與焦慮、內(nèi)向與外相、感情用事與安詳機(jī)警、怯懦與果斷)。分?jǐn)?shù)越高表明更具有該方面人格特征。自編創(chuàng)造傾向問卷共20道題,包括發(fā)散性、求異性、探索性、敏捷性、操作性5個因素,分?jǐn)?shù)越高表明創(chuàng)造性傾向越高。②對組間16種人格量表測驗(yàn)結(jié)果差異比較采用t檢驗(yàn)。結(jié)果:發(fā)放問卷700份,收回有效問卷538份,問卷回收率76.8%。利用極端分組法,將總分低于0分的定為低分組,選90人,其中男女生各半;總分在12分以上為高分組,選90人。①16種人格量表各因子評分結(jié)果:高分組學(xué)生在16種人格量表的穩(wěn)定性、恃強(qiáng)性、有恒性、敢為性4因子評分明顯高于低分組(t=4.366～10.098,P0.01),在憂慮性、興奮性2項(xiàng)明顯低于低分組(t=-4.449,-5.615,P0.01)。②次級人格特征差異:高分組4項(xiàng)二級因素中適應(yīng)焦慮評分明顯低于低分組[(4.52±1.52),(5.72±1.35)分,t=-5.589,P0.01],內(nèi)外向、情感和怯弱果斷評分分別為(7.92±1.54),(6.50±1.41),(6.06±1.31)分,高于低分組[(5.86±1.65),(5.61±1.41),(5.44±1.63)分,t=8.610,4.229,2.798,P0.01]。結(jié)論:高創(chuàng)造傾向大學(xué)生具有高穩(wěn)定性、高恃強(qiáng)性、高有恒性、高敢為性、低憂慮性、低興奮性人格特征;次級人格特征為適應(yīng)性焦慮低、外傾、情感豐富、果斷、剛毅。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the personality differences between high creative tendency and low creative tendency of college students and analyze their personality characteristics. Methods 700 college students in Xi'an were randomly selected from October 2005 to October 2005. All agreed to participate in the questionnaire evaluation. A total of 187 questions were assessed with the Carson's 16 Personality scale and the creativeness questionnaire, including 16 root personality factors (musical group, intelligence, stability, strength, excitability), and a total of 187 questions, including 16 personality factors (musical group, intelligence, stability, dependence on strength, excitability), a total of 187 questions, including 16 personality factors (music group, intelligence, stability, strength and excitability). Constant, daring, sensitive, sceptical, fantasy, worldly, anxious, experimental, independent, self-disciplined, nervous) and four secondary factors (adaptation and anxiety, introversion and external, emotional and serendipity), Cowardice and decisiveness The higher the score, the higher the personality. There were 20 questions including divergence, heterogeneity, exploratory, agility and maneuverability. The higher the score was, the higher the creative tendency was. 2. The difference of 16 personality scale test results among the groups was compared with t test. Results: 700 questionnaires were sent out, 538 valid questionnaires were collected, and the recovery rate was 76. 8%. By using the extreme grouping method, the group with a total score of less than 0 was classified as a low group, and 90 people were selected, of whom half were male and half; the group with a total score of more than 12 was a high score group. The scores of 90 persons and 116 personality scales were as follows: the scores of the high score group students in 16 personality scales were significantly higher than those in the low score group (t 4.366 / 10.098 / P0.01), and the scores of stability, strength and consistency were significantly higher than those of the lower group (t = 4.366 / 10.098 / P0.01). 鍏村鎬，

本文編號：2214445