發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-07 18:28

【摘要】："國(guó)學(xué)"作為中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化的簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)并非自古就有的概念,近代"國(guó)學(xué)"熱潮與"亡國(guó)滅種"的危機(jī)、以及民族主義文化思潮不可分割。但把傳統(tǒng)"國(guó)學(xué)"化身為當(dāng)今"國(guó)家最高學(xué)術(shù)",卻是大錯(cuò)特錯(cuò)。當(dāng)代中國(guó)的"國(guó)學(xué)"不僅包括亙古以來(lái)的本土文化,還應(yīng)容納"五四"以后輸入的西方現(xiàn)代文明與文化,可稱(chēng)為"新國(guó)學(xué)"�！朔N無(wú)所不包的"新國(guó)學(xué)"觀恰是對(duì)(舊)"國(guó)學(xué)"的解構(gòu)。如此以來(lái),"國(guó)學(xué)"這一稱(chēng)謂是否還有存在之必要?
[Abstract]:As the abbreviation of Chinese traditional culture, the concept of "national studies" is not existed since ancient times. The crisis of "national studies" and "subjugation" in modern times, as well as the trend of thought of nationalist culture are inseparable. But it is a great mistake to incarnate the traditional Sinology as the highest academic of the country today. Contemporary China's "Sinology" includes not only the ancient native culture, but also the western modern civilization and culture imported after the May 4th Movement. It can be called "New Sinology". This all-inclusive "New Sinology" view is the deconstruction of (old) "Sinology". Since then, is there any need for the term "national studies" to exist?
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)中文系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G122
，

本文編號(hào)：2454309