天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 教育論文 > 國學(xué)論文 >

“國學(xué)”新視野

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-26 12:29

  本文選題:得失成敗 + 工作方式; 參考:《南京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》2015年03期


【摘要】:正國學(xué)是好東西,但不該是震天響的口號(hào)。因?yàn)?一旦成為口號(hào),猶如漫天翻卷的大旗,必定旗下魚龍混雜,招來很多翻手為云、覆手為雨的江湖騙子。當(dāng)下中國,"國學(xué)大師"的頭銜似乎比物理學(xué)家、歷史學(xué)家、考古學(xué)家等要好聽得多?晌覍τ诤笳呋拘湃;對于前者則敬畏之余,不無幾分疑慮——主要是搞不清楚其研究對象、工作方式及努力方向,因而不好評價(jià)其得失成敗。
[Abstract]:Chinese learning is a good thing, but it should not be a rallying cry. Because, once become a slogan, like the banner full of flips, must be mixed up, attracting a lot of turn over for the cloud, overhand for the rain of liars. In China, the title of "master of Chinese culture" seems to be much better heard than physicists, historians, archaeologists, etc. But I have basic trust in the latter, while in awe of the former, I have some misgivings mainly because I do not know the object of study, the way of work and the direction of efforts, so I am not good at evaluating the success or failure of its success or failure.
【分類號(hào)】:G122


本文編號(hào):1806031

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/guoxuejiaoyulunwen/1806031.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶c5609***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com