發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-19 12:36

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 教育行政 學(xué)科設(shè)置 國(guó)學(xué) 儒學(xué)　出處：《天津社會(huì)科學(xué)》2010年03期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)下學(xué)界最出格的"國(guó)學(xué)熱"莫過(guò)于欲將"國(guó)學(xué)"推上一級(jí)學(xué)科位置的盲動(dòng)。"國(guó)學(xué)"一詞原本有特定的指稱(chēng)對(duì)象,即"邦國(guó)庠序"。漢唐以來(lái),國(guó)學(xué)主要指國(guó)家最高教育行政機(jī)構(gòu)及其附屬的等級(jí)地位最高的國(guó)立學(xué)校,而崇尚儒教為"天子之學(xué)"的一般特征。正是由于儒學(xué)即國(guó)學(xué)、國(guó)學(xué)即儒學(xué)的涵義根深蒂固,一些學(xué)者所謂的"國(guó)學(xué)觀"之爭(zhēng)主要是儒學(xué)觀之爭(zhēng),而儒學(xué)觀之爭(zhēng)的焦點(diǎn)又是儒學(xué)現(xiàn)代價(jià)值之爭(zhēng)。獨(dú)尊儒術(shù)的"國(guó)學(xué)"不適用于現(xiàn)代;區(qū)隔中西的"國(guó)學(xué)"存在重大偏弊;涵義混亂的"國(guó)學(xué)"無(wú)法界定學(xué)科;夸大功能的"國(guó)學(xué)"不能使之太熱。如果將"國(guó)學(xué)"列入一級(jí)學(xué)科名錄,就會(huì)對(duì)中國(guó)現(xiàn)代學(xué)術(shù)產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)重的負(fù)面影響。
[Abstract]:The most special "Ancient Chinese Literature Search heat" than to "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" onto a subject position. This "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" is a word originally referring to specific objects, namely "state school". Since the Han and Tang Dynasties, Ancient Chinese Literature Search mainly refers to the national highest education administrative agencies and their affiliated grade the highest national status school, and advocating Confucianism as the general characteristics of "emperor's school". It is because of its Ancient Chinese Literature Search Ancient Chinese Literature Search, namely meaning ingrained Confucianism, some scholars called "Ancient Chinese Literature Search view" dispute is mainly Confucianism dispute, and the focus of Confucianism and Confucianism for the modern value of Confucianism in the dispute. "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" does not apply to the modern western segment; "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" has a major shortcoming; meaning the confusion of "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" cannot be defined discipline; exaggerating the function of "hot Ancient Chinese Literature Search" can't make it. If the "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" included in the disciplines of modern academic list, will have serious Chinese Negative effects.

【作者單位】： 南開(kāi)大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院暨中國(guó)社會(huì)史研究中心;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G122
【正文快照】： 當(dāng)下學(xué)界最出格的“國(guó)學(xué)熱”莫過(guò)于欲將“國(guó)學(xué)”推上超級(jí)學(xué)科或一級(jí)學(xué)科位置的盲動(dòng)。令人欣慰的是,眾多有識(shí)之士紛紛提出頗具說(shuō)服力的批評(píng)意見(jiàn),國(guó)家教育行政機(jī)構(gòu)也采取了慎重的態(tài)度。孔子曰:“名不正,則言不順。言不順,則事不成�！北疚膫�(cè)重從內(nèi)涵混亂、名實(shí)相混的角度,進(jìn)一

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾廣燦;老舍早期活動(dòng)的一些新材料[J];天津社會(huì)科學(xué);1983年01期

2 向東;瑞麟;;老舍早期工作情況的辨正[J];中國(guó)現(xiàn)代文學(xué)研究叢刊;1983年01期

3 ;中華人民共和國(guó)教育部的賀信[J];語(yǔ)文建設(shè);1984年06期

4 羅元舜;馬作仁;;簡(jiǎn)論元初南方的學(xué)者和教育[J];蒙古學(xué)信息;1984年01期

5 劉U，

本文編號(hào)：1444223