本文選題：高校教學 + 同行評議�。� 參考：《山東師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國高等學校大眾化進程的不斷推進,高等院校的教學質量已成為社會各界普遍關注的焦點。高等學校教學評議是高校主動適應經濟、政治、文化、科學技術發(fā)展的需要,對高校進行監(jiān)督和診斷,保證高等學校教育活動的實際結果與培養(yǎng)目標保持一致,保障各類人才的質量,發(fā)揮高等教育在社會各方面的作用。高校教學評議在發(fā)展過程中出現(xiàn)了各種不同的評議形式,但總的來說,在高校教學評議中,學生評教、教師自評、領導監(jiān)察評議、同行評議各占不同的權重,發(fā)揮著各自的作用,但由于學生及領導對教學內容不熟悉,無法對教師掌握知識的深度和廣度、教師的課程設置能力以及教師所用的教學材料的科學性等問題作出準確的評議。教師自身則處于“當局者迷”的狀況中,而同行專家能夠站在旁觀者的角度,又因為所學專業(yè)或領域相同或相近,可以對教師日常教學過程做出全面、準確的評判。因此本研究中對高校教學同行評議進行了詳細的介紹,使高校教學評議主體更完善,有利于保障高校教學質量。本論文的主要工作是研究高校教學同行評議,對高校教學同行評議的目的、評議主體和客體、評議方法和標準、評議實施程序和評議反饋等進行研究和介紹,了解高校教學同行評議中存在的問題以及在提高教育教學質量方面的作用。從研究內容來看,本文分為五個部分:第一部分是緒論,主要明確了本文研究的問題和研究意義,綜述了國內外關于高校教學同行評議的研究文獻,闡述本文的研究內容、方法和思路。第二部分介紹了同行評議發(fā)展的過程。對文中的主要概念進行了界定,將同行評議在各個領域的演進過程做了介紹,著重闡釋了教學中同行評議方法的運用。第三部分陳述了高校教學同行評議機制的構建,包括評議目的、評議主體、評議客體、評議方法和標準、評議實施程序和評議反饋等。第四部分結合我國高校實際情況對高校教學同行評議中存在的問題以及相應的改進建議進行了闡述。高校教學同行評議中所存在的問題主要有高校教學同行評議的人文失落、同行評議專家遴選方式不完善、同行評議非共識問題等。第五部分對文章進行了概述和梳理,并對研究程序中的問題進行了反思,以及以后應從哪些方面加深研究,進而使研究更有說服力。
[Abstract]:With the development of popularization of colleges and universities in our country, the teaching quality of colleges and universities has become the focus of attention. The teaching evaluation of colleges and universities is the initiative of colleges and universities to adapt to the needs of economic, political, cultural, scientific and technological development, to supervise and diagnose colleges and universities, and to ensure that the actual results of educational activities in colleges and universities are consistent with the objectives of cultivation. Ensure the quality of all kinds of talents and give play to the role of higher education in all aspects of society. In the course of the development of teaching evaluation in colleges and universities, there are various forms of evaluation, but generally speaking, in the process of teaching evaluation in colleges and universities, students' evaluation of teaching, teachers' self-evaluation, leaders' supervision and evaluation, and peer reviews each have different weights. Because students and leaders are not familiar with the teaching content, they can not make an accurate comment on the depth and breadth of the teachers' knowledge, the teachers' ability of curriculum setting and the scientific nature of the teaching materials used by the teachers. The teachers themselves are in the situation of "the local fans", and the peer experts can stand on the bystander's point of view, and because their major or field is the same or similar, they can make a comprehensive and accurate judgment on the teachers' daily teaching process. Therefore, this paper introduces the peer review of college teaching in detail, which makes the subject of teaching review more perfect and helps to ensure the quality of teaching in colleges and universities. The main work of this paper is to study the peer review of teaching in colleges and universities, and to study and introduce the purpose, subject and object, methods and standards, procedure and feedback of peer review of teaching in colleges and universities. To understand the problems existing in peer review of teaching in colleges and universities and its role in improving the quality of education and teaching. From the point of view of the research content, this paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, which mainly clarifies the problems and significance of this study, summarizes the domestic and foreign research literature on peer review of teaching in colleges and universities, and expounds the research content of this paper. Methods and ideas. The second part introduces the development process of peer review. This paper defines the main concepts, introduces the evolution process of peer review in various fields, and emphatically explains the application of peer review method in teaching. The third part describes the construction of peer review mechanism in colleges and universities, including the purpose, subject, object, method and standard, procedure and feedback. In the fourth part, the problems in peer review of teaching in colleges and universities and the corresponding suggestions for improvement are expounded in combination with the actual situation of colleges and universities in our country. The main problems in peer review of teaching in colleges and universities are the humanistic loss of peer review in colleges and universities, the imperfect selection of peer review experts, the non-consensus problems of peer review, and so on. The fifth part summarizes and combs the article, and reflects on the problems in the research procedure, as well as what aspects should be further studied in order to make the research more persuasive.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G642

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 周玉容;沈紅;;大學教學同行評價:優(yōu)勢、困境與出路[J];復旦教育論壇;2015年03期

2 胡錦繡;;高�？蒲性u價制度的國際比較研究[J];科研管理;2015年S1期

3 管海燕;;英國高等教育科研卓越評估體系[J];世界教育信息;2015年01期

4 方玉東;常宏建;劉志鵬;;美國國家科學基金會的利益沖突管理及若干啟示[J];中國基礎科學;2014年06期

5 蔡紅梅;許曉東;;高校課堂教學質量評價指標體系的構建[J];高等工程教育研究;2014年03期

6 劉振天;;高校教學評估何以回歸教學生活本身[J];高等教育研究;2013年04期

7 龍三平;;同行評議在高校教學評估中的應用——以美國UNL項目為例[J];鎮(zhèn)江高專學報;2013年02期

8 蔡瑞;文鵬;;高校人才同行評議現(xiàn)狀分析及信息化建設的思考[J];中國高校師資研究;2013年02期

9 劉丹;;國內同行評議專家?guī)煅芯烤C述[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2012年05期

10 胡菲;;高校科技期刊同行評議制度調查與分析[J];科技與出版;2012年09期

相關博士學位論文 前4條

1 韋劍劍;本科教學評價的后現(xiàn)代主義反思[D];蘇州大學;2014年

2 鄭延福;本科高校教師教學質量評價研究[D];中國礦業(yè)大學;2012年

3 任艷紅;高校教學評價制度的反思與重構[D];陜西師范大學;2011年

4 賀穎;基于科學計量視角的同行評議專家遴選問題研究[D];天津大學;2008年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王攀;高校教師科研評價研究[D];武漢理工大學;2006年

，

本文編號：2001858