本文選題：高校德育 + 德育系統(tǒng)��； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：立德樹人是教育的根本任務(wù),也是高校的立身之本。在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期和高等教育大眾化的當(dāng)前,我國(guó)高校德育面臨諸多理論和實(shí)踐問題,改革高校德育以提升實(shí)效成為人們的共識(shí)。共生理論自提出以來(lái),因其對(duì)多元共存、互動(dòng)共生等理念的強(qiáng)調(diào),對(duì)共生系統(tǒng)整體性、開放性、層次性、包容性及生成性等基本特征的揭示,為我們重新認(rèn)識(shí)高校德育諸要素間及要素內(nèi)部各因子間的關(guān)系提供了新視角,為解決高校德育內(nèi)外部不和諧因素提供了新思路。然而,在高校德育研究領(lǐng)域還缺乏對(duì)共生理論價(jià)值的深入挖掘,有鑒于此,本研究從共生的視角出發(fā)對(duì)高校德育諸要素及其內(nèi)部因子間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行審視,按照“提出問題─分析問題─解決問題”的邏輯思路,主要解決三個(gè)問題:一是當(dāng)前高校德育的主要問題有哪些;二是造成這些問題的原因何在;三是要解決這些問題,以共生理論為參照,高校德育應(yīng)做出怎樣的改革。當(dāng)前我國(guó)高校德育存在諸多問題:一是高校德育與其所處環(huán)境存在罅隙,表現(xiàn)在高校與家庭和社會(huì)缺乏互動(dòng)合作以及高校內(nèi)部環(huán)境德育要素缺乏整合;二是德育各主體包括教師之間、學(xué)生之間和師生之間有效交往不足;三是德育內(nèi)容缺乏整合,片面強(qiáng)調(diào)政治性德育內(nèi)容而忽視生活化德育內(nèi)容,片面強(qiáng)調(diào)知識(shí)性德育內(nèi)容而忽視情意性德育內(nèi)容;四是德育實(shí)施過程中形式主義,突出表現(xiàn)在德育途徑與德育目標(biāo)兩張皮和德育實(shí)施中的“目中無(wú)人”。這些問題從根本上反映了德育系統(tǒng)中各要素的分離,究其原因在于:學(xué)校德育功利化和規(guī)范倫理學(xué)下,德育目標(biāo)中只見社會(huì)不見個(gè)人,德育內(nèi)容中只見道德規(guī)范傳授不見道德主體自我建構(gòu);單子式人學(xué)觀下,德育實(shí)施過程中人與人之間的孤立;德育系統(tǒng)內(nèi)部系統(tǒng)觀缺位下,德育目的、內(nèi)容、途徑等要素相互獨(dú)立而存在。因此,當(dāng)前我國(guó)高校德育走出困境的關(guān)鍵在于促進(jìn)德育系統(tǒng)各因素的整合。以共生理論為參照,必須建立和發(fā)展高校德育系統(tǒng)的共生屬性,即建構(gòu)高校德育共生系統(tǒng),以德育要素間互動(dòng)共生關(guān)系的加強(qiáng)來(lái)改善高校德育的整體功能。這包括三方面的工作:一是通過優(yōu)化家庭教育和社會(huì)教育,并加強(qiáng)家庭、社會(huì)和高校的互動(dòng)以打造“家庭-社會(huì)-高�！币惑w化的共生環(huán)境;二是以加強(qiáng)全體教師參與德育工作的自覺性和教師隊(duì)伍的德育素養(yǎng)專業(yè)化建設(shè)為抓手提升高校德育共生單元的質(zhì)量;三是促進(jìn)高校德育共生單元間的互動(dòng)共生,這主要包括德育主體間的交往共生、德育內(nèi)容的多元整合及提升德育實(shí)施途徑的針對(duì)性等方面。
[Abstract]:It is the fundamental task of education and the foundation of higher education. In the current period of social transformation and popularization of higher education, moral education in colleges and universities in China is faced with many theoretical and practical problems. It has become a common understanding to reform moral education in colleges and universities in order to enhance the actual effect. Since the theory of symbiosis was put forward, because of its emphasis on the concept of multiple coexistence and interactive symbiosis, it reveals the basic characteristics of symbiotic system, such as integrity, openness, hierarchy, inclusiveness and generative, etc. It provides a new angle of view for us to understand the relationship between the elements of moral education in colleges and universities and the internal and external factors of moral education in colleges and universities, and provides a new way to solve the internal and external disharmonious factors of moral education in colleges and universities. However, in the field of moral education research in colleges and universities, there is still a lack of deep excavation of the theoretical value of symbiosis. In view of this, this study examines the relationship between the elements and internal factors of moral education in colleges and universities from the perspective of symbiosis. According to the logic of "putting forward problems-analyzing problems-solving problems", three main problems are solved: first, what are the main problems of moral education in colleges and universities at present; second, what are the causes of these problems; and thirdly, to solve these problems, With the theory of symbiosis as a reference, what kind of reform should be made in moral education in colleges and universities? At present, there are many problems in moral education in colleges and universities in our country: first, there are gaps between moral education in colleges and universities and the environment in which they live, which is manifested in the lack of interactive cooperation between colleges and universities, family and society, and the lack of integration of the elements of moral education in colleges and The other is the lack of effective communication between teachers, students and teachers and students, the lack of integration of the contents of moral education, the one-sided emphasis on the content of political moral education, and the neglect of the content of moral education of life. The fourth is formalism in the implementation of moral education, which is manifested in the two skins of moral education approach and moral education goal and the "no one in sight" in the implementation of moral education. These problems fundamentally reflect the separation of various elements in the moral education system. The reason lies in: under the utilitarian and normative ethics of moral education in schools, there are no individuals in the moral education goal. In the content of moral education, only the moral norms are imparted without the moral subject self-constructing; under the single-child view of human studies, the isolation between people in the process of moral education is carried out; under the absence of the internal systematic view of moral education system, the purpose and content of moral education, Approaches and other elements exist independently of each other. Therefore, the key of moral education in colleges and universities is to promote the integration of various factors of moral education system. With the theory of symbiosis as the reference, we must establish and develop the symbiotic property of moral education system in colleges and universities, that is, to construct the symbiotic system of moral education in colleges and universities, and to improve the overall function of moral education in colleges and universities by strengthening the interactive symbiotic relationship among the elements This includes three aspects of work: first, through optimizing family education and social education, and strengthening the interaction between family, society and colleges and universities to create a "family-social-university" integration of symbiotic environment; The second is to promote the quality of moral education symbiosis unit in colleges and universities by strengthening the consciousness of all teachers participating in moral education work and the professional construction of moral education literacy of teachers; third, to promote the interaction and symbiosis among moral education symbiotic units in colleges and universities. This mainly includes the communication and symbiosis between the subjects of moral education, the pluralistic integration of the contents of moral education and the pertinence of the ways of implementing moral education.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G641

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭忠祥;;基于系統(tǒng)理論的學(xué)校大德育工作體系建構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)教育學(xué)刊;2016年S1期

2 檀傳寶;;“德”“育”是什么?——德育概念的理解與德育實(shí)效的提高[J];中國(guó)德育;2016年17期

3 高成;;師生交往的現(xiàn)實(shí)審視及其重構(gòu)——基于生命哲學(xué)的視野[J];教育研究與實(shí)驗(yàn);2016年04期

4 劉倩;李曉波;;共生共融:高校師生關(guān)系的現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展途徑[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2016年06期

5 貢勛;張忠華;;從“支配——從屬”到“和諧——共生”——師生關(guān)系發(fā)展的社會(huì)學(xué)審視[J];教育評(píng)論;2016年04期

6 高德勝;;競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的德性及其在教育中的擴(kuò)張[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2016年01期

7 付勝利;張勃;;略論美育在高�！傲⒌聵淙恕敝械淖饔肹J];學(xué)校黨建與思想教育;2016年02期

8 魯潔;;重新認(rèn)識(shí)道德和道德教育[J];人民教育;2015年19期

9 檀傳寶;;合乎道德的教育與真正幸福的追尋——當(dāng)代中國(guó)教育的倫理思考[J];課程.教材.教法;2015年08期

10 張鳳池;胡守鈞;;從共生視角看古代德育方法的當(dāng)代運(yùn)用[J];理論界;2015年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 陳甜;基于主體共生的教學(xué)觀研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

2 丁立義;基于共生理論的創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)模式創(chuàng)新研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2013年

3 武云斐;合作 共生 共贏[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

4 海佳;基于共生思想的可持續(xù)校園規(guī)劃策略研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2011年

5 于光;德育主體論[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

6 李燕;共生教育論綱[D];山東師范大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 鄒太龍;高校德育層次性研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

2 李運(yùn)奎;共生教育理念下的課堂教學(xué)研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2011年

3 邱關(guān)軍;內(nèi)涵與價(jià)值：貴州占里共生教育研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

4 陳志垠;論高校德育系統(tǒng)的構(gòu)建[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

5 史莉潔;“共生”理論及其當(dāng)代意義[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

6 張婷;道德共生：品德課程開發(fā)的價(jià)值選擇[D];山東師范大學(xué);2004年

7 鮑聰;共生性師生關(guān)系——對(duì)師生關(guān)系的一種闡述[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1963531