本文選題：質(zhì)量管理 + 思想政治教育　； 參考：《桂林理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近些年黨和國家越來越重視思想政治教育質(zhì)量問題,多次以不同形式要求不斷提升思想政治教育質(zhì)量。思想政治教育決策是思想政治教育的起始環(huán)節(jié)和重要組成部分,提高思想政治教育決策質(zhì)量是提升思想政治教育質(zhì)量的首要任務(wù)和重要保障。思想政治教育決策是思想政治教育決策者為了快速達(dá)成預(yù)定的目標(biāo)、及時解決存在的問題或有效預(yù)防不利因素的發(fā)生,采用一定的理論和方法對思想政治教育決策信息進(jìn)行分析、判斷后制訂若干個方案,并對這些方案進(jìn)行評估后從中選擇最佳的一個或一組方案進(jìn)行實(shí)施完善的過程。針對當(dāng)前思想政治教育決策中存在的一些問題,包括決策者自身素質(zhì)不過硬、決策目標(biāo)籠統(tǒng)不具體、決策方案時效性不強(qiáng)、決策監(jiān)督反饋制度和決策問責(zé)制度有待完善和決策方法創(chuàng)新性有待提高等。本論文在借鑒質(zhì)量管理相關(guān)理論和方法的基礎(chǔ)上,采用案例論證法、邏輯演繹法和文獻(xiàn)綜述法等研究方法就影響思想政治教育決策質(zhì)量的要素進(jìn)行了分析和論證。提出為了不斷提高思想政治教育決策質(zhì)量必須要優(yōu)化決策者結(jié)構(gòu)、規(guī)范決策程序、完善決策制度和創(chuàng)新決策方法的觀點(diǎn)。文章主要分為以下四個章節(jié):第一章主要介紹了選題來源、研究意義、國內(nèi)外研究綜述、研究思路與方法和研究創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。第二章主要介紹思想政治教育決策質(zhì)量的定義和內(nèi)涵以及研究的理論依據(jù)。第三章主要是利用大學(xué)生抵制日貨游行、藥家鑫事件、延安整風(fēng)運(yùn)動和向雷鋒同志學(xué)習(xí)活動四個案例分析論證影響思想政治教育決策質(zhì)量的要素。第四章主要是從優(yōu)化決策者結(jié)構(gòu)、規(guī)范決策程序、完善決策制度和創(chuàng)新決策方法四個方面提升思想政治教育決策質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the Party and government pay more and more attention to the quality of ideological and political education, and constantly improve the quality of ideological and political education in different forms. The decision-making of ideological and political education is the starting link and an important part of ideological and political education. Improving the quality of decision-making of ideological and political education is the primary task and important guarantee to improve the quality of ideological and political education. The decision making of ideological and political education refers to the decision makers of ideological and political education to solve the existing problems or effectively prevent the occurrence of unfavorable factors in order to reach the predetermined goal quickly. The decision information of ideological and political education is analyzed by using certain theories and methods, and several schemes are made after judgment, and the best one or a group of schemes is selected to carry out the perfect process after the evaluation of these schemes. In view of the problems existing in the current decision-making of ideological and political education, including the poor quality of the decision makers themselves, the general and unspecific objectives of the decision making, the lack of timeliness of the decision-making schemes, The decision-making supervision feedback system and decision-making accountability system need to be improved and the innovation of decision methods need to be improved. Based on the relevant theories and methods of quality management, this paper analyzes and demonstrates the factors that affect the quality of ideological and political education decision-making by the methods of case study, logical deduction and literature review. In order to improve the quality of decision making in ideological and political education, it is necessary to optimize the structure of decision makers, standardize the decision-making procedure, perfect the decision-making system and innovate the decision-making methods in order to improve the decision quality of ideological and political education. The article is divided into the following four chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the source of the topic, research significance, domestic and foreign research review, research ideas and methods and research innovation. The second chapter mainly introduces the definition and connotation of decision-making quality of ideological and political education and the theoretical basis of the research. The third chapter mainly uses the college students to boycott the Japanese goods march, the Yao Jiaxin event, the Yan'an rectification movement and the study activity from Comrade Lei Feng four case analysis demonstration influence ideological and political education decision-making quality factor. The fourth chapter is to improve the quality of ideological and political education decision-making from four aspects: optimizing the structure of decision makers, standardizing decision-making procedures, perfecting the decision-making system and innovating decision-making methods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：桂林理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G641

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 駱郁廷;;論高校黨組織思想政治工作的主體責(zé)任[J];思想理論教育;2017年03期

2 布超;;關(guān)于高校思想政治教育領(lǐng)導(dǎo)管理體制的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];思想教育研究;2015年07期

3 楊曉慧;任志鋒;;論提升大學(xué)生思想政治教育質(zhì)量的“時、度、效”[J];思想理論教育;2015年07期

4 王樹蔭;石亞玲;;論提升思想政治教育質(zhì)量的著力點(diǎn)[J];思想理論教育;2015年07期

5 朱國芬;;“有限理性”視閾下的高校思想政治教育決策思考[J];江蘇高教;2014年05期

6 張淑芳;;行政決策失誤的責(zé)任追究探討[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2013年06期

7 鄭永廷;;大學(xué)生思想政治教育質(zhì)量提升的理論研究[J];思想教育研究;2013年06期

8 呂艷華;;思想政治教育與公眾參與探析[J];求實(shí);2013年04期

9 馮剛;;學(xué)習(xí)貫徹黨的十八大精神努力提升大學(xué)生思想政治教育質(zhì)量[J];思想理論教育導(dǎo)刊;2013年02期

10 劉延?xùn)|;;深化高等教育改革 走以提高質(zhì)量為核心的內(nèi)涵式發(fā)展道路[J];求是;2012年10期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 張爍;;把思想政治工作貫穿教育教學(xué)全過程 開創(chuàng)我國高等教育事業(yè)發(fā)展新局面[N];人民日報(bào);2016年

2 馮剛;;以改革創(chuàng)新理念推動思想政治教育質(zhì)量提升[N];中國教育報(bào);2016年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉慶標(biāo);現(xiàn)代思想政治教育技術(shù)論[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳婷婷;思想政治教育決策科學(xué)化研究[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2013年

2 張彩琴;新時期思想政治教育決策科學(xué)化研究[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1947532