本文選題：成果導(dǎo)向教育　切入點(diǎn)：課程考核成績(jī)分析法　出處：《清華大學(xué)教育研究》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：針對(duì)目前高校工程教育專業(yè)認(rèn)證中有關(guān)畢業(yè)要求達(dá)成度評(píng)價(jià)方法中存在的問題,作者提出成果導(dǎo)向評(píng)價(jià)構(gòu)架。該評(píng)價(jià)構(gòu)架包括課程考核成績(jī)分析法、評(píng)價(jià)尺規(guī)法和問卷調(diào)查法。在建立畢業(yè)要求指標(biāo)點(diǎn)與課程支撐關(guān)系前提下,確定課程對(duì)畢業(yè)能力要求支撐的權(quán)重系數(shù);由課程評(píng)價(jià)中對(duì)指標(biāo)點(diǎn)達(dá)成度的評(píng)價(jià)值及其權(quán)值,計(jì)算指標(biāo)點(diǎn)達(dá)成度數(shù)值,并與目標(biāo)值進(jìn)行對(duì)比,得到每個(gè)指標(biāo)點(diǎn)的達(dá)成度評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果;綜合衡量每個(gè)指標(biāo)點(diǎn)的達(dá)成度評(píng)價(jià)情況,得到基于課程考核成績(jī)分析法的畢業(yè)要求達(dá)成情況。對(duì)于評(píng)價(jià)尺規(guī)法,首先建立評(píng)價(jià)尺規(guī)基本模型,并獲取學(xué)生對(duì)課程支撐的畢業(yè)要求的定量評(píng)價(jià)和樣本數(shù)據(jù),生成基于樣本空間平均分的評(píng)價(jià)尺規(guī)表;根據(jù)此樣本尺規(guī)表,教學(xué)指導(dǎo)委員會(huì)成員給出評(píng)價(jià)意見,主講教師據(jù)此進(jìn)行反饋,寫出整改措施。對(duì)于調(diào)查問卷法,覆蓋了在校生、畢業(yè)生和用人單位的三方調(diào)查問卷在內(nèi)容上做到了全面性、去主觀性以及被調(diào)查方的審慎性,獲得的結(jié)果驗(yàn)證了通過課程考核成績(jī)分析法和尺規(guī)評(píng)價(jià)法所獲得的畢業(yè)要求達(dá)成度。
[Abstract]:In view of the problems existing in the evaluation method of degree of achievement of graduation requirements in the certification of engineering education in colleges and universities at present, the author puts forward a results-oriented evaluation framework, which includes the analysis of course assessment results. On the premise of establishing the relationship between graduation requirement index point and curriculum support, the weight coefficient of curriculum support for graduation ability requirement is determined. The achievement degree of each index point is calculated and compared with the target value, and the evaluation result of the achievement degree of each index point is obtained, and the achievement degree evaluation of each index point is synthetically measured. For the evaluation rule method, the basic evaluation model is established, and the students' quantitative evaluation and sample data of the graduation requirements supported by the curriculum are obtained. Based on the average score of sample space, the evaluation gauge table is generated. According to the sample scale table, the members of the teaching steering committee give the evaluation opinion, and the principal teacher gives feedback accordingly and writes out the corrective measures. For the questionnaire method, it covers the students in the school. The tripartite questionnaire between graduates and employers is comprehensive in content, subjective and cautious in nature. The result verifies the degree of achievement of graduation requirements obtained by the method of course examination score analysis and gauge evaluation.
【作者單位】： 大連理工大學(xué)機(jī)械工程學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：G642;TB-4
，

本文編號(hào)：1589623