【摘要】：正符號(hào)學(xué)與符號(hào)敘述學(xué),是形式論在當(dāng)代最集中的代表。對(duì)于形式論,從古代起就有不少誤會(huì),至今有不少"理論家"還在反反復(fù)復(fù)說(shuō)那幾句指責(zé),說(shuō)是形式論不關(guān)心社會(huì),不關(guān)心歷史。因此,首先要說(shuō)清楚的是:形式論并不是只關(guān)注形式,棄內(nèi)容于不顧,認(rèn)為形式可以解決有關(guān)文學(xué)藝術(shù)的一切問(wèn)題。恰恰相反,形式論只是指出:許多文化問(wèn)題,內(nèi)容問(wèn)題,"從形式出發(fā)",往往更可以擊中要害。因?yàn)槿魏伪磉_(dá)意義的符號(hào)文本,其內(nèi)容必須寄于一定的形式。
[Abstract]:Positive semiotics and symbolic narratology are the most concentrated representatives of formalism in contemporary times. There have been many misunderstandings about formalism since ancient times. Up to now, many "theorists" are still repeating the accusations, saying that formalism does not care about society or history. Therefore, first of all, we should make it clear that the formal theory is not only concerned with form, but ignores the content, and thinks that form can solve all the problems concerning literature and art. On the contrary, the formal theory only points out that many cultural problems, content problems, "from the form", often more can hit the point. Because any symbolic text expressing meaning, its content must be sent to a certain form.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)文學(xué)與新聞學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I206.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 羅維斯;;民國(guó)視野下文藝民族形式論爭(zhēng)的區(qū)域特征[J];新文學(xué)評(píng)論;2013年01期

2 徐西羽;關(guān)于民族形式論爭(zhēng)的若干問(wèn)題[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1983年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2411999